* Andrew Paolucci:
> Can anyone with a Cogent connection in Canada verify that they are
> impacted as well?
I think it's global. I tried sites in Canada and Germany, and the
traces look like deliberate blocking of /32s. I don't have a BGP view
for these sites, though.
Why wouldn't it be global
* Jared Mauch:
> So risk avoidance on the part of the 100k other sites hosted by CF is
> now a conspiracy?
Conspiracy is perhaps a bit too strong, but I would be annoyed if
someone took my business, but then deliberately undermined the service
they provide. Of course, if it's all part of the agr
* Todd Crane:
> I am not familiar with Cogent’s architecture but why couldn’t they
> just null route the IP address at their edge routers from within
> Spain? I am not a lawyer but from what I understand, since the Spanish
> government has zero say on what goes on outside of their borders,
Of cou
On Friday, 17 February, 2017 08:29, "Florian Weimer" said:
> Of course they do, see the arrest of Augusto Pinochet.
Universal Jurisdiction is supposed to cover the likes of war crimes, torture,
extrajudicial executions and genocide, that are generally agreed to be crimes
against humanity as a
* > On Friday, 17 February, 2017 08:29, "Florian Weimer"
said:
>
>> Of course they do, see the arrest of Augusto Pinochet.
>
> Universal Jurisdiction is supposed to cover the likes of war crimes,
> torture, extrajudicial executions and genocide, that are generally
> agreed to be crimes against hu
And when you go to figure out why that IP wont ping through Cogent on
your exchange, and start troubleshooting but can't get any answers
as to why things are bust...
[ Clearly now an operational issue for NANOG. ]
Purposely breaking routing and not being able to talk about why is going to
set man
I'm not sure Cogent is on any IXes?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Chase"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 9:56:23 AM
Subject: gagging *IX dire
Just meant it as a parallel operational example. Both situations, while legally
distinct, present the same operational issues.
Purposely breaking things - and then being required to keep the breakage secret
-
is going to mess up a whole lot of things. (How does Chinese operators handle
this?)
There is one problem: The article is factually incorrect on multiple points. So
comparing A to B when B is a fairy tale does not make much sense.
The proposed constitutional changes are in the public domain.
--
TTFN,
patrick
P.S. Full disclosure, I am a LINX director. So maybe I’m saying this
> On Feb 17, 2017, at 16:46, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
> There is one problem: The article is factually incorrect on multiple points.
It would be interesting to know what points those are, it reads mostly
accurately
to me.
> The proposed constitutional changes are in the public domain.
The
On Fri Feb 17, 2017 at 05:19:32PM +, William Waites wrote:
> So instead of saying, "we have this new spying law in the UK and we need
> to rejigg the decision-making at LINX so we will be ready in case we are
> required to do something that must be kept secret"
Yes but "hey government, swivel
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
MENOG, SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists
It's a pretty shocking development.
It's one thing to nobble a single network under the IP Act to interfere
with equipment but to use a neutral exchange to nobble shared
infrastructure used across US and UK and ... is a completely different
can of worms.
I don't exercise a vote anymore at LINX bu
Anyone from RocketFiber's engineering group on this list?
Contact me off-list please!
Eric
14 matches
Mail list logo
