Well what else would you expect from todays information age. It’s like leaving
a $100.00 bill on the sidewalk and expecting it to be there the following day.
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 00:08, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>
> What a friendly, helpful place the modern Internet is!
>
> Like the forre
Can I take that as a sign you are interested in participating in the project?
In any case, I think I indicated it would be available soon, and prior to the
hackathon, and eventually via a ‘neutral’ code repo. Perhaps you are interested
in coming? I’ve copied Nick from Princeton if that is the ca
On 29.09.2016 21:52, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> Hello PeeringDB users / hello NANOG,
>
> the PeeringDB Product Committee (PC, [0]) is charged with steering the
> future product development and running the market outreach efforts to
> continuously improve the value that PeeringDB delivers to the netwo
Does anyone make a coherent CWDM 40G QSFP? I thought so, but the first couple
places I checked, I struck out at. This would be for a passive mux\MROADM.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Jason Hellenthal
wrote:
> Well what else would you expect from todays information age. It’s like
> leaving a $100.00 bill on the sidewalk and expecting it to be there the
> following day.
More like $2,621,440.00. Certainly too attractive to pass up!
Not aware of ACO/DCO in QSFP form factor. Inphi is doing 100G QSFP28 PAM4
DWDM for MS. Probably the best you will see for a while.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:50 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> Does anyone make a coherent CWDM 40G QSFP? I thought so, but the first
> couple places I checked, I struck out a
6 matches
Mail list logo