On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:33:18PM -0700, George William Herbert wrote:
> > On Aug 31, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
> > there's just wy too many sites using WoSign (and StartCom) for the
> > CAs' roots to just be pulled. Sad, but true.
>
> Not even. Pull away.
Not going to happen.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 06:49:17PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > On Aug 31, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Netscape. Great ecosystem you built.
>
> Nobody at that time had a clue how this environment was going to scale,
> let alone what the wide-ranging security issue
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:36:57AM +1000,
Matt Palmer wrote
a message of 45 lines which said:
> I'd be surprised if most business continuity people could even name
> their cert provider,
And they're right because it would be a useless information: without
DANE, *any* CA can issue a certificat
Ken Chase wrote:
> 3 of my internet-lifetimes/startups ago, we had this happen when one of the L2
> techs was doing their 'rounds' - but had a backpack on. They swung around and
> hit the safety cover on the BRS - which got knocked off. They freaked
> out a bit while putting the cover back on...
I have been looking at optical wave carriers for some long haul 1G/10G
across the US. All to major cities and well known POP's.
I am finding that there are not a lot of carriers who are offering wave
services, usually just ethernet/MPLS.
Particularly across the North west.
Can someone shed some
Heya.
I can’t speak with any evidence but I do have some infrastructure in Brazil and
I can tell you I saw stubbornly persistent packet loss for the past two months.
Across at least two tier one backbones. I don’t know anything about 500Gbps
but large sustained DDoSes against BR locations for
Zayo and Electric lightwave are two options, not sure who owns the fibre in the
ground in each case.
Regards,
Marty Strong
--
CloudFlare - AS13335
Network Engineer
ma...@cloudflare.com
+44 7584 906 055
smartflare (Skype)
https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/13335
>
There are lots of national carriers in the US. A much smaller number
of those carriers actually own the fiber cables. There are a handful
(Zayo, Level3, CenturyLink, Windstream, Earthlink, Verizon) that have
very large national, or semi-national foot prints.
The carriers frequently trade and lease
It is a good point about the conduit diversity. Lots of guys in the Wiltel
conduit, for example. Right now there are a lot of new regional fiber optic
networks and also some new dark fiber networks (one is connecting all the
Trans-Atlantic landing stations and telecom hotels in New Jersey). Ther
(Speaking purely for myself, and thoroughly
demonstrating my relative ignorance on the
topic, but also opening up an opportunity
to become better educated...)
You may find that optical providers don't really
want to mix 1G/10G waves in on systems that
are running Nx100G waves on the fiber. With
1
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, t...@29lagrange.com wrote:
I have been looking at optical wave carriers for some long haul 1G/10G across
the US.
You probably should describe what you mean by "optical wave". If you mean
"I want bit-transparent capacity with grey light handoff, that is not
overbooked", t
Dear Nanog community
We are currently using RT for tracking tasks related to network operations
like BGP configuration change requests, circuit/ports activation, support
tickets, etc, but when trying to track multiple activities that involve
multiple departments, the RT (Request Tracker) system do
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:07:33PM -0600, Manuel Marín wrote:
> We are currently using RT for tracking tasks related to network operations
> like BGP configuration change requests, circuit/ports activation, support
> tickets, etc, but when trying to track multiple activities that involve
> multiple
13 matches
Mail list logo
