My biggest issue with Meraki is that their tech staff can run tcpdump on the
wired or wireless interface of your Meraki box without having to leave their
desk. I have no reason to believe that they are malicious, or in the pay of
the NSA, but I am too paranoid to allow their equipment anywhere
I believe they fixed this -- when I've spoken to tech support recently, I had
to give them a tech support key so that they could access the devices I had
questions about.
-Original Message-
From: "Paul Nash"
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 8:55am
To: "Untitled 3"
Subject: Re: automa
For several of our clients, we use Sophos UTMs coupled with their RED
units. Once registered with the UTM, the RED unit auto creates an SSL
based VPN back to the UTM. The RED unit is managed from the UTM and pulls
it's config when it boots. It's similar to the function of Meraki without
the direc
Guys, thanks for all the responses. Thanks to everyone's feedback, we have a
number of options that were not on the original list and that is what I was
hoping for. Now it's a matter of comparing
cost/learning-curve/support-challenge/compatibility with tools/monitoring,
etc...
Thanks again.
>
Lorenzo did a MUM presentation(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeZetH9uX_Y)
on how road warriors can can connect with a Mikrotik to automatically
configure VPN. Pretty novel idea using inexpensive hardware. It may not
be as user friendly as you need, though.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Ric
My biggest issue with Meraki is the fundamentally flawed business model,
biased in favor of vendor lock in and endlessly recurring payments to the
equipment vendor rather than the ISP or enterprise end user.
You should not have to pay a yearly subscription fee to keep your in-house
802.11(abgn/ac)
I treat Meraki like SmartNET. The subscription comes with lifetime support
(TAC + Warranty), you do have support on your production network gear don't
you? It's not like they trick you going into it either. I for one am a huge
fan of the simplicity, it just works.
Disclaimer: We use them. ~35 acce
On 6/29/16 15:33, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
My biggest issue with Meraki is the fundamentally flawed business model,
biased in favor of vendor lock in and endlessly recurring payments to the
equipment vendor rather than the ISP or enterprise end user.
You should not have to pay a yearly subscription fe
On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 16:00 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> I often wonder if Microsoft will someday make Office365 the only way
> to get Office, which if you don't maintain a subscription your
> locally installed copy of Word will cease to function.
I live for that day.
Regards, K.
--
~
There is a downside to subscription pricing for the vendor: they don't get the
instant cashflow they're used to. I know Cisco seems to be taking a tactic
where only some product lines use subscriptions and the others are on a typical
enterprise 3-5 year replacements cycle to provide Cisco with t
10 matches
Mail list logo