On 24 May 2016 at 23:04, Spencer Ryan wrote:
Hey,
> We are heavily invested in Ixia, they are very expensive, but if you need
> the kind of precision they provide they work very well.
I've used all big three, Agilent (back in packets and protocols), IXIA
and Spirent. And several smaller/cheaper
Ugh. In all cases below, where it says Agilent it should say IXIA.
> Many times in QoS testing you'd have EF, AF, BE
> traffic, and you have expectation how many percentage in given
> situation should given class drop, doing this in Agilent is a chore.
>
> Agilent probably has best in the breed ne
Yeah. We run all of our IXIA gear 24/7 in automated feature/regression
testing. We are looking into high density layer 1 packet switches so we can
automate physical topology changes as well.
On May 25, 2016 3:14 AM, "Saku Ytti" wrote:
Ugh. In all cases below, where it says Agilent it should say I
Hi,
This depends very much on which Ixia product you're using. In IxExplorer and
IxNetwork require a lot of manual labor when setting up a test. IxLoad has a
little less, but still. It is important to realize that most of the tests can
be automated using TCL scripts. The company I'm currently w
On 25 May 2016 at 23:34, Sabri Berisha wrote:
> This depends very much on which Ixia product you're using. In IxExplorer and
> IxNetwork require a lot of manual labor when setting up a test. IxLoad has a
> little less, but still. It is important to realize that most of the tests can
> be automa
http://isoc-ny.org/p2/8521
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
--
-
6 matches
Mail list logo
