Re: Equipment Supporting 2.5gbps and 5gbps

2016-01-29 Thread Jared Mauch
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:07:16PM -0600, Yang Yu wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Brandon Butterworth > wrote: > > > With 10G it's been the opposite, nobody was using copper so SFP+ is > > cheap. Only recently has copper 10G started to become common, a bit too > > late to be worth both

Re: Equipment Supporting 2.5gbps and 5gbps

2016-01-29 Thread Tim Jackson
On Jan 29, 2016 6:29 AM, "Jared Mauch" wrote: > > SFP+ Copper Twinax is another option for 10G to save on the transceivers > > Not really. > > You can get 10G optics for sub-$10 and patch cords for cheap too, > so why spend >$50 on DAC cables when you can go fiber and save > space

Remote Sites

2016-01-29 Thread nanog1
For those of you in an enterprise setting who have remote or satellite locations, how do you have your network access set up? In the past a hub/spoke type model was fairly prevalent. In theory, gives you some extra control and a more consolidated location to deploy infrastructure at (security and

ICYMI: Princeton Conference on Interconnection

2016-01-29 Thread Livingood, Jason
I figured this might interest a few folks here: https://citp.princeton.edu/event/interconnection/ Jason

Weekly Routing Table Report

2016-01-29 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, PaNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists

T-Mobile's Binge On violates net neutrality, says Stanford report

2016-01-29 Thread Brian Reichert
Presumably, this is getting some eyes: http://www.tmonews.com/2016/01/t-mobiles-binge-on-violates-net-neutrality-says-stanford-report/ T-Mobile's Binge On violates net neutrality, says Stanford report In a new report published today - and filed to the FCC, as well - van Schewick says th

Re: T-Mobile's Binge On violates net neutrality, says Stanford report

2016-01-29 Thread nanog-isp
> In a new report published today - and filed to the FCC, as well > - van Schewick says that Binge on "violates key net neutrality > principles" and "is likely to violate the FCC's general conduct > rule." Sure it does, but will anything ever be done about it? Jared

Re: Equipment Supporting 2.5gbps and 5gbps

2016-01-29 Thread Alex Hargrove
> Then you have the issue of Intel NICs refusing to support any optical modules > that dont show up as Intel (and the associated work arounds, etc) I just purchased some empty Intel X520-DA2 cards and then picked up the E10GSFPSR-compatible optics for them from Fiberstore. I was worried about

RE: small automatic transfer switches

2016-01-29 Thread frnkblk
There's also WTI, which we use: http://www.wti.com/c-41-automatic-transfer-switch.aspx Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Anderson Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:30 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: small automatic transfer switches