On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Csaba's front page previously described the software as being a
> 'routerOS', like in the very first sentence on the page. I'm assuming that
> the person who complained about that didn't read past the first sentence
> and just wa
It wasn't about trolling, it was about legitimate prior art and reasonably
so. Also, there's potentially a confusing association between the two.
I'm glad the terminology was removed.
On Dec 28, 2015 2:31 PM, "Laszlo Hanyecz" wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Csaba's front page previously described the softwar
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> It wasn't about trolling, it was about legitimate prior art and reasonably
> so. Also, there's potentially a confusing association between the two.
>
> I'm glad the terminology was removed.
Since it's an operating system for routing IP,
At the time of the announcement, this is what the page looked like (GIF
attachment attempted).
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Laszlo Hanyecz"
To: "Mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Would a 1and1 clueful DNS and Email Expert contact me off list. Tech support
cannot seem to provide a customer of ours with appropriate help.
Thanks
- --
Jason Hellenthal
JJH48-ARIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWgrHgAAoJEDL
In fairness, when I first looked at the page, I was confused too.
It said it ran as a “Router OS Process” which made me think that it was
somehow a virtual router that ran inside the Mikrotik operating system
known as Router SO and I was scratching my head going:
A: How can that possibly work?
B:
Thanks for clearing it up, I was still confused what Mikrotik's OS had to
do with it.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> In fairness, when I first looked at the page, I was confuse
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> In fairness, when I first looked at the page, I was confused too.
>
That content of web page(s) must have been altered between when Josh R. and
I viewed it.
>
> It said it ran as a “Router OS Process” which made me think that it was
> someh
Amazing what the proprietary appropriation of a single Word can do :)
-mel
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:08 AM, Mike - st257 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> In fairness, when I first looked at the page, I was confused too.
>>
>
> That content of web page(s) m
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> On 24 December 2015 at 03:04, wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:39:11 -0800, Reza Motamedi said:
>> > Aren't availability, guaranteed service and remote hands an incentive to
>> do
>> > peering inside a third party colocation?
>>
>> Sure.
Could someone from Cloudflare's operations please contact me off-list?
Thanks,
-w
--
William Waites | School of Informatics
https://tardis.ed.ac.uk/~wwaites/ | University of Edinburgh
https://hubs.net.uk/ | HUBS AS60241
The University of Edinburgh is a chari
Apparently there is still raison d'etre for everyone not a giant telco.
We placed the circuit with tagging expected for the service vlan.
We got it delivered without.
We requested it be changed.
Apparently that takes a change order, which when it is finally filed,
takes 7-10BD to complete.
Has anyone else observed Netflix sessions attempting to come into customer CPE
devices at well in excess of the customers throttled plan?
I'm not talking error retries on the line. I'm talking like two to three times
in excess of what the customers CPE device can handle.
I'm observing massive
Adaptive bandwidth detection.
On Dec 29, 2015 8:59 PM, "Matt Hoppes" wrote:
> Has anyone else observed Netflix sessions attempting to come into customer
> CPE devices at well in excess of the customers throttled plan?
>
> I'm not talking error retries on the line. I'm talking like two to three
>
So they are trying to stuff every last bit as an end device modulates up and
down?
Or are you saying that's how they determine if they can scale up the resolution
"because there is more throughout available now".
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 22:10, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> Adaptive bandwidth detect
The second part. Fixed wireless is not even on their radar.
On Dec 29, 2015 9:16 PM, "Matt Hoppes" wrote:
> So they are trying to stuff every last bit as an end device modulates up
> and down?
>
> Or are you saying that's how they determine if they can scale up the
> resolution "because there is
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>
>> It wasn't about trolling, it was about legitimate prior art and reasonably
>> so. Also, there's potentially a confusing association between the two.
>>
>> I'm glad the terminology was r
17 matches
Mail list logo
