fingerprint shows China and Russia related as expected
Why do the abuse teams in China and Russia ignore basic abuse reports, why
peer/setup connections to companies where abuse is ignored.
Colin
> On 8 Dec 2015, at 07:24, Joe Morgan wrote:
>
> We received a similar ransom e-mail yesterday fol
https://stat.ripe.net/KP#tabId=routing
KP's one asn and four prefixes go off net about 10:35
Last year when this happened to several large providers, it was a cluster all
around the same time, and it turned out that it was the same org hitting all of
them. This quickly came to light as we (ISIPP) started coordinating with the
targets, because the attacker was using the same gmail addre
What's even better is that if you can get the feedback button on the
lower right to do anything, this is the response:
HTTP ERROR 404
Problem accessing /standards-ra-web/pub/%5Bappln.feedback.link%5D. Reason:
Not Found
On 12/9/2015 10:32 AM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
They’ve made so
FWIW the exact same thing (identical initial ransom email) happened to us
two weeks ago. The "2 day" message was received on December 3rd. The
group claiming responsibility has yet to follow through.
The messages came from a various bitmessage.ch addresses.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Joe
These are the three e-mail addresses they have contacted me on so far.
armada.collect...@bk.ru
melvin.webst...@gmail.com
luciennemcglyn...@gmail.com
--
Thank You,
Joe Morgan - Owner
Joe's Datacenter, LLC
http://joesdatacenter.com
816-726-7615
In related news, Verizon and ATT WILL be charging their data partners:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/12/verizon-to-test-sponsored-data-let-companies-pay-to-bypass-data-caps/
"Verizon is reportedly set to begin testing a sponsored data program that
would let companies pay Verizon to deliver
On 9 Dec 2015, at 16:32, Brandon Applegate wrote:
Anyone have any insight on how one can look up an OUI (yes I know
about oui.txt, but I’m asking about a live query site).
Just hacked my own site for a lot of reasons:
https://icmp.info/tools/oui
https://icmp.info/tools/oui?ouiinput=00:24:3
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny
wrote:
> In related news, Verizon and ATT WILL be charging their data partners:
> http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/12/verizon-to-test-sponsored-data-let-companies-pay-to-bypass-data-caps/
>
> "Verizon is reportedly set to begin testing a sponsored
Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny
> wrote:
> > is that still net neutrality?
>
> who cares? mobile was excepted from the NN rulings.
Any why the desire for extra regulation for Internet services?
Shippers (you know, actual Common Carrie
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny
>> wrote:
>> > is that still net neutrality?
>>
>> who cares? mobile was excepted from the NN rulings.
>
> Any why the desire for extra regulation fo
You already have the ability to pay for faster service.
NN prevents the carrier from then going to the shipper and extorting
further money to deliver the same package.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at
On Thu 2015-Dec-10 13:32:25 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny
wrote:
> is that still net neutrality?
who cares? mobile was excepted from the NN rulings.
Any why the desire for extra regulation for Internet s
On December 10, 2015 at 08:20 col...@gt86car.org.uk (Colin Johnston) wrote:
> fingerprint shows China and Russia related as expected
> Why do the abuse teams in China and Russia ignore basic abuse reports, why
> peer/setup connections to companies where abuse is ignored.
I wonder how much of
> On Dec 10, 2015, at 2:32 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> I could have paid more to get it faster, and some large-scale shippers
> have special arrangements that seem to get their packages priority. How
> is this different from Internet traffic?
For me the better comparison is international postal
> > "Verizon is reportedly set to begin testing a sponsored data program that
> > would let companies pay Verizon to deliver online services without using up
> > customers' data plans. The news comes from aRe/code interview
This is usually referred to as "zero-rating" and is related to,
perhap
For starters much of the internet infrastructure is built on govt
mandated/protected monopolies or very small N oligopolies so is
already subject to significant regulation.
You can start up a business carrying packages for people for a fee, no
harder than any other business.
Try spinning up a ca
hi
On 12/10/15 at 11:07am, Joe Morgan wrote:
> These are the three e-mail addresses they have contacted me on so far.
> armada.collect...@bk.ru
> melvin.webst...@gmail.com
> luciennemcglyn...@gmail.com
Ian> messages came from a various bitmessage.ch addresses
# i wonder if they all have the sam
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:26 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > On Nov 23, 2015, at 14:58 , Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> >
> > In message e24772e7-a95b-4866-9630-2b1023ebd...@delong.com>>, Owen DeLong write
> > s:
> >>
> >>> On Nov 23, 2015, at 14:16 , Christopher Morrow
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon,
On 2015-12-10 13:07, William Kenny wrote:
> "Verizon is reportedly set to begin testing a sponsored data program that
> would let companies pay Verizon to deliver online services without using up
> customers' data plans.
In Canada, the Telecom Act 27(2) states:
Unjust discrimination
(2) No Can
> On Dec 10, 2015, at 17:49 , Jean-Francois Mezei
> wrote:
>
> On 2015-12-10 13:07, William Kenny wrote:
>
>> "Verizon is reportedly set to begin testing a sponsored data program that
>> would let companies pay Verizon to deliver online services without using up
>> customers' data plans.
>
>
On 2015-12-10 20:58, Owen DeLong wrote:
> What if the rate charged is the same?
>
> Wouldn’t it still be problematic if:
>
> I pay VZ $15/Gigabyte for all data I use except Netflix which gets billed
> automatically to Netflix instead of me?
If Netflix gets charged the same retail rate, then I g
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny
wrote:
> In related news, Verizon and ATT WILL be charging their data partners:
> http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/12/verizon-to-test-sponsored-data-let-companies-pay-to-bypass-data-caps/
Howdy,
Personally, I'm not opposed to this. When each pac
On 2015-12-10 21:39, William Herrin wrote:
> Personally, I'm not opposed to this. When each packet has one payer,
> it doesn't much matter whether the payer is sender or recipient.
If the retail customer pays for $70 for 100 gigs of UBB, and uses 50
gigs of Netflix, then the result is that the c
All,
I'm working on trying to move VM's from site A to site B, simple enough
motion to complete.
The issue is the VM's on site A have to stay the same so once the VM's are
moved across they still have site A address but are location now on site B,
so what happens is return path for the VM traf
> On Dec 10, 2015, at 18:51 , Jean-Francois Mezei
> wrote:
>
> On 2015-12-10 21:39, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> Personally, I'm not opposed to this. When each packet has one payer,
>> it doesn't much matter whether the payer is sender or recipient.
>
>
> If the retail customer pays for $70 fo
26 matches
Mail list logo
