Mark Andrews writes:
> The DHCP server usually is sitting
> in a data center on the other side of the country with zero ability
> to inject approptiate routes.
Not too sure about that. At least, that's not what we do. We run the
DHCPv6 and DHCP servers on our BNGs (or BRAS or whatever the curr
> > The DHCP relay could also have injected routes but that is a second
> > class solution.
>
> DHCP relays *are* second class solutions :) Unfortunately they cannot
> always be avoided in the semi-L2-environments like ISP access networks
> often are.
Each to his own, I guess. Some of us are usi
Keenan Tims wrote:
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?
>
> I'm surprised you're supporting T-Mob here Owen. To me it's pretty
> clear: they are charging more for bits that are not streaming video.
> That's not neutral treatment from a policy perspective,
The bottom line is the value/price ratio. We should all be working to add
value. By any means necessary.
The pitfall of low priced "services", is that it's hard to balance the
support level and lower price for services.
If Bluehost and lower end web hosters can completely do away with the
suppor
> Well the requesting router could announce the route. ISC's client
> has hooks that allow this to be done. That is, after all, how
> routing is designed to work. The DHCP server usually is sitting
> in a data center on the other side of the country with zero ability
> to inject approptiate rout
5 matches
Mail list logo
