On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Dave Bell wrote:
> On 22 October 2015 at 19:41, Mark Tinka wrote:
>> The "everything must connect to Area 0" requirement of OSPF was limiting
>> for me back in 2008.
>
> I'm unsure if this is a serious argument, but its such a poor point
> today. Everything has t
A network that we manage is having trouble getting to several sites. The common
point of failure appears to be Level 3 in Chicago. Connections work fine from
our direct upstream, so it appears that Level 3 is not allowing traffic sourced
from the net block in question. Can someone from Level 3
On 30/Oct/15 15:34, Matthew Petach wrote:
> It is rather nice that IS-IS does not require level-2 to be
> contiguous, unlike area 0 in OSPF. It is a valid topology
> in IS-IS to have different level-2 areas connected by
> level-1 areas, though you do have to be somewhat
> careful about what rou
Dyn Research, Doug Madory, has a good blog post looking at the physical
threats affecting submarine cables; as well as covering recent historical
submarine cable outages due to human action.
http://research.dyn.com/2015/10/the-threat-of-telecom-sabotage/
And also a very nice infographic by Ca
No follow up required or expected.
FYI geo-location fans.
While sitting on a toilet in a hotel in Kansas City, Missouri, US of A,
I chanced to log-on to Facebook from my Kindle, and the lap-top in the
on the desk in another room, Facebook alerted that I had logged on from
Caracas, Venezuela.
Can anyone point me to a Microsoft Geo-IP admin? Their Geo-IP for
live.com/outlook.com seems to be rather outdated.
We get complaints for 85.195.208.0/20 and 85.195.224.0/19, pointing to
Antarctic instead of Switzerland. Any commercial Geo-IP shows correct
information, but Office product activatio
I will connect you offlist
Mehmet
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a Microsoft Geo-IP admin? Their Geo-IP for
> live.com/outlook.com seems to be rather outdated.
>
> We get complaints for 85.195.208.0/20 and 85.195.224.0/19, pointing to
> Antarctic
On 10/30/15 3:31 PM, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
> No follow up required or expected.
>
> FYI geo-location fans.
>
> While sitting on a toilet in a hotel in Kansas City, Missouri, US of A,
> I chanced to log-on to Facebook from my Kindle, and the lap-top in the
> on the desk in another room,
Turn on all the google tracking bugs on the phone and get a GPS fix outside.
http://android.stackexchange.com/questions/4715/how-may-i-submit-a-wifi-hotspot-to-androids-database-for-a-better-triangulation/4716#4716
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> On 10/30/15 3:31 PM, Lauren
Hi,
I'm looking for any tool or a way I could specify a CIDR and the prefixes
that are being used within this CIDR and the tool show me all free
supernets.
Example:
192.168.0.0/24 - CIDR
Used subnet's:
192.168.0.1/32
192.168.0.8/27
192.168.0.64/26
192.168.0.68/32
192.168.0.96/29
Tool Result =
most reasonable ipam tools will track or express unallocated vs
allocated space.
netdot has a lovely address-space container/block view for managing free
vs allocated space
joel
On 10/31/15 9:51 AM, John Steve Nash wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for any tool or a way I could specify a CIDR and th
> On Oct 30, 2015, at 7:51 PM, John Steve Nash
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for any tool or a way I could specify a CIDR and the prefixes
> that are being used within this CIDR and the tool show me all free
> supernets.
>
I've used subnetsmngr for this in the past. Proper usage of it thr
12 matches
Mail list logo
