Re: IP-Echelon Compliance

2015-10-10 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Nothing could possibly go wrong with turning loose a poorly coded software tool to make automated legal threats in the most litigious nation on earth. On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:00:19PM +0200, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > > Do I just block them

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-10 Thread Eric Kuhnke
As Jeremy has described in detail, the problem is at OSI layer 1. Not a lack of peering exchanges such as the VANIX. There is no dark fiber route from Alaska via the Yukon to Vancouver. I know where most of the Telus (ILEC) and Northwestel (Bell) fiber is in northern BC and none of interconnects w

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-10 Thread Todd Underwood
In general, most of NANOG recipients live in the populated metros and know very little about what it's like to try to provide internet access in the hinterlands. do not pay attention to there magical claims of 'just connect to some IX and everything will be fine'. you already know that that's not

Re: IP-Echelon Compliance

2015-10-10 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > Nothing could possibly go wrong with turning loose a poorly coded software > tool to make automated legal threats in the most litigious nation on earth. you'd think, but they've been doing this for nigh on 8 yrs at least at this point.