> one of my colleagues just posted this visualiation
> of the internet from the as_path view of 2914. if you are on
> a mobile, you have to physically move your device around.
>
> http://as2914.net/
>
> If you love it, send Job your accolades. If you hate it,
> see above discl
Hello!
Thanks for recommendation, Alvin!
As author of FastNetMon I will be very glad to hear some feedback
about my tool and could help with configuration / development :)
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 6:22 AM, alvin nanog
wrote:
>
> hi aluisio
>
> On 09/06/15 at 02:01am, Aluisio da Silva wrote:
>>
hi pavel
On 09/06/15 at 06:11pm, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
> Thanks for recommendation, Alvin!
just "on the list of flow stuff to look at"
- opensource like fastnetmon is good for techies and solving problems
- commercial products may be what large corp purchasing folks like
i've looked into the f
On 9/4/2015 6:31 PM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
I, for one, feel your pain in this matter. When I was a consultant in
The Bad Ol' Days, I had so many telephone numbers where I *could* be
that my .sig would be a run-on one as well. As a compromise, I had my
cell number and a hyperlink to a We
On 9/6/2015 11:46, Robert Drake wrote:
Maybe people could adopt an unofficial-official end-of-signature flag.
Then you could have procmail strip everything after the flag:
--
This is my signature
My phone number goes here
I like dogs
-- end of signature --
Everythin
--- rdr...@direcpath.com wrote:
From: Robert Drake
Maybe people could adopt an unofficial-official
end-of-signature flag. Then you could have
procmail strip everything after the flag:
-
It could be much easier. Folks that care about the
mailing lis
On 9/6/2015 14:18, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- rdr...@direcpath.com wrote:
From: Robert Drake
Maybe people could adopt an unofficial-official
end-of-signature flag. Then you could have
procmail strip everything after the flag:
-
It could be much easier.
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 06:59:36PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> Does anybody have a citation that legal disclaimers attached to
> publicly posted mail aren't null and void?
Disclaimers are invalid on their face because they're an attempt
to unilaterally enforce contractual terms witho
I've taken to sending such mail back with a note "message deleted at
your request".
The more urgent the question, the better.
R's,
John
--- larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
From: Larry Sheldon
On 9/6/2015 14:18, Scott Weeks wrote:
> --- rdr...@direcpath.com wrote:
> From: Robert Drake
>
> Maybe people could adopt an unofficial-official
> end-of-signature flag. Then you could have
> procmail strip everything after the flag:
> -
Thank you all for the comments.
Does anyone know about FlowTraq and DeepField tools?
Thanks.
Aluísio da Silva
Coordenação de Planejamento e Engenharia
CTBC
(34) 3256-2471
(34) 9976-0471
www.ctbc.com.br
-Mensagem original-
De: alvin nanog [mailto:nano...@mail.ddos-mitigator.net]
Enviada
Hi Aluisio,
Have you had a look at Lancope's Stealthwatch?
If you go that route give a shout as we've written a bunch of scripts to
do things like scan detection and new service alerting.
Cheers,
Harry
On 9/5/15 10:01 PM, Aluisio da Silva wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone here have a suggestion
On 2015-09-06 19:18, Scott Weeks wrote:
It could be much easier. Folks that care about the
mailing list rules, want to be courteous to list
folks and want to use their company email, rather
than one that inserts no disclaimer, could put 15
lines of blank as part of their signature. This
would f
13 matches
Mail list logo
