Is there a multi-tennant capable UTM from Sophos? Or are you using a vm
instance per customer?
Thanks,
Andrew
On 17.08.2015 16:47, Colin Johnston wrote:
sophos utm works great :)
Colin
On 17 Aug 2015, at 05:56, Rakesh M wrote:
I have seen one of our customers using Sophos and they are
rel
hi
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ramy Hashish
> wrote:
>
> We are planning to implement a multi-tenant FW/UTM and start providing
> security as a service, I would like to hear if anybody had experience on
that'd be a good thing ... but ...
> this, and if there are any recommendations f
Thank you Rakesh and Colin.
I just want to amend something, "FW as a service" rather than "security as
a service".
Are you sure sophos has such a solution?
Thanks,
Ramy
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Colin Johnston
wrote:
> sophos utm works great :)
>
> Colin
>
> > On 17 Aug 2015, at 05:56
one vm per sophos utm per customer
works well even with low ram as well
Colin
> On 17 Aug 2015, at 08:14, Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> Is there a multi-tennant capable UTM from Sophos? Or are you using a vm
> instance per customer?
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> On 17.08.2015 16:47, Colin Johnston wrote:
Have a look below Ramy pdf
https://www.sophos.com/en-us/medialibrary/PDFs/partners/sophos_complete_security_msps_dsna.pdf?la=en
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Ramy Hashish
wrote:
> Thank you Rakesh and Colin.
>
> I just want to amend something, "FW as a service" rather than "security as
>
On Aug 16, 2015, at 8:44 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> On Aug 15, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Job Snijders wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 11:01:56PM +0530, Glen Kent wrote:
Is there a paper or a presentation that discusses the drops in
Dear All
Just wondering if anyone can share with me target IP Transit pricing they have
been able to achieve with China Telecom and China Unicom delivered to LA or
AMS, after rounds of negations.
Capacity Required (1G to 10G)
Bonus points if you have contact information for someone who can pro
Is this based on 90% to 95% of the traffic is invalid/spam/scans/direct-attacks
?
If based on engagement with abuse teams then give a factor for engagement,
otherwise don’t bother.
Colin
> On 17 Aug 2015, at 13:10, James Braunegg wrote:
>
> Dear All
>
> Just wondering if anyone can share wi
There is also the problem with multi-homed customers where Cogent is in the
mix. The dropped packets at Cogent's peering points to eyeball networks break
certain protocols that are packet loss sensitive (VoIP, IPSEC, etc...).
Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd
Director of Opera
I could see it going through several private peering, but not through multiple
exchanges.
Justin Wilson
j...@mtin.net
---
http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth
http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman
Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabr
Terms get over-used & overloaded in many cases. So it is difficult to tell if
this is just a miscommunication, but I think I disagree with this statement.
“Private Peering” in the strictest sense is still peering. You do not have
“private peering” with your transit provider, even though the traf
of course checkpoint.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Rakesh M wrote:
> Have a look below Ramy pdf
>
> https://www.sophos.com/en-us/medialibrary/PDFs/partners/sophos_complete_security_msps_dsna.pdf?la=en
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Ramy Hashish
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Rakesh and C
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:27 AM, alvin nanog
wrote:
>
> hi
>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ramy Hashish
>> wrote:
>>
>> We are planning to implement a multi-tenant FW/UTM and start providing
>> security as a service, I would like to hear if anybody had experience on
>
> that'd be a good th
On 8/15/15 09:47, Glen Kent wrote:
Hi,
Is it fair to say that most traffic drops happen in the access layers, or
the first and the last miles, and the % of packet drops in the core are
minimal? So, if the packet has made it past the first mile and has
"entered" the core then chances are high t
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Scott Whyte wrote:
>
>
> On 8/15/15 09:47, Glen Kent wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it fair to say that most traffic drops happen in the access layers, or
>> the first and the last miles, and the % of packet drops in the core are
>> minimal? So, if the packet has made i
15 matches
Mail list logo
