Re: AT&T att.net postmaster contact needed

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:47:30PM -0500, Larry Sheldon wrote: > Seems like this exact question comes up pretty frequently. > > Maybe NANOG should consider a repository of frequent inquiries... Maybe AT&T and others should consider reading RFC 2142 and implementing it properly, like every com

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

I am setting one up and invited Chris to moderate it with me. I've always looked for a list that covers that topic as well. I followed the same name style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain. On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote: > Did you come across one? > > Sent from

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

A very good idea! -mel via cell > On Aug 11, 2015, at 6:06 AM, Rafael Possamai wrote: > > I am setting one up and invited Chris to moderate it with me. I've always > looked for a list that covers that topic as well. I followed the same name > style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain.

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

Very nice. Please let us know when you have it up and available. Robert On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:01:59 -0500 Rafael Possamai wrote: I am setting one up and invited Chris to moderate it with me. I've always looked for a list that covers that topic as well. I followed the same name style as nan

Cogent revisited

Hi all, We are getting ready to renew our fiber contract with our incumbent provider (Lightower, ASN 46887). We are happy with them, but are looking for alternatives. At the location in question we need about 200M. Cogent recently contacted us, and I shied away a bit, based on this conversa

RE: Data Center operations mail list?

Thank you for getting this going. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Rafael Possamai Sent: ‎8/‎11/‎2015 9:02 AM To: Ryan Finnesey Cc: Chris Boyd; NANOG Subjec

Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions

We have processed just under a million anomalies with this software, we use the Chelsio cards for filtering. We had some troubles with packet loss on the filter side until we started using those which were a new feature in the latest release. If you have any questions I would be happy to answer

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

> On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai wrote: > style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain. Nad Cog?

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:59:41AM -0700, James Downs wrote: > > > On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai wrote: > > > style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain. > > Nad Cog? North American Data Center Operations Group, perhaps? -- Mike Andrews, W5EGO mi...@mikea.ath.cx Tired

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, James Downs wrote: > > > On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai wrote: > > > style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain. > > Nad Cog? datacenterops.org is still available *hint*hint* ~Marcin

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

dc-...@puck.nether.net has been around for at least 5 years and has, to date, 3 or 4 emails IIRC. It’s still there if you want something already built and functional. Mike > On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, James Dow

Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions

We tested it a while back and found that it was fine for single source attacks but fell over with multiple sources. Has that changed? On 8/11/2015 9:42 AM, Nick Rose wrote: We have processed just under a million anomalies with this software, we use the Chelsio cards for filtering. We had so

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

There is a DC-ops list hosted at puck I setup for people awhile ago. Feel free to use that. Jared Mauch > On Aug 6, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Chris Boyd wrote: > > Is there a mail list that’s analogous to NANOG, but focused on the data > center infrastructure and operations? The shorty.com hosted l

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

Hi, On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, James Downs wrote: > >> >> > On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai wrote: >> >> > style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain. >> >> Nad Cog? > > > datacenterops.org is still available *hint*hint* > >

Re: Super Core Hardware suggestions

And what about Juniper ACX5000 (96x SFP + 10GbE and 40GbE QSFP + 8x), you can consider it as P only? http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/routing/acx-series/acx5000/ Tks, Matias 2015-08-10 18:05 GMT-03:00 Scott Larson : > I'm in the same boat myself. One thing I can share is Ju

Re: free Tools to monitor website performance

Monitis has a free option called monitor.us and you can set up several different kinds of probes in many locations. [image: Phone.com] James SinkSenior Network Engineer js...@phone.com(800) 997-9179 x506Try Phone.com free! CONFIDENT

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

Absolutely feel free to use it; I haven't seen a single message on it in... well, it was 3 years ago I was in datacenters regularly, so I'm goin with "3 years". :-) Cheers, -- jra - Original Message - > From: "Jared Mauch" > To: "Chris Boyd" > Cc: "NANOG" > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2

Re: free Tools to monitor website performance

I have had a good experience with uptimerobot.com 50 monitors are free and at a 5 min interval. If you need more features then you can upgrade to the pro version. They have multiple locations too. http://uptimerobot.com/locations On 2015-08-11 10:59 AM, James Sink wrote: Monitis has a free opt

Re: free Tools to monitor website performance

On 5 August 2015 at 19:23, sathish kumar Ippani wrote: > Hi All, > > Thanks to all for reviewing my topic, may it is slightly off topic. > > We have almost 300 URL's (local and web) and we want to monitor few of them > which are very critical URL's for web access and local access. > > I would like

Branch Location Over The Internet

We have an enterprise that has a headquarter office with redundant fiber connections, its own ASN, its own /22 IP block from ARIN, and a couple of gigabit internet connections from multiple providers. The office is taking full BGP routes from tier 1 providers using a Juniper MX80. They are establi

Re: Branch Location Over The Internet

Hi, On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:21:09PM -0500, Colton Conor wrote: > We have an enterprise that has a headquarter office with redundant fiber > connections, its own ASN, its own /22 IP block from ARIN. > [ ... ] > > If you were to do this with Juniper or Cisco gear what would you have at > each lo

RE: Branch Location Over The Internet

Hi, Mikrotik Routerboard + (encrypted) Ethernet over IP (EoIP). If required: MPLS+OSPF+BGP in the EoIP for additional features. Build the pseudo Layer2 with two dedicated boxes. In the HQ you can hand it over directly to the MX80 and at the new office you can work with small boxes like Cisco 7

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

Exactly. I figured if it can be organized with the help of the community and provide other benefits aside from a mailing list, I wouldn't have a problem with helping. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:07 AM, mikea wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:59:41AM -0700, James Downs wrote: > > > > > On Aug 11

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

What is the mailman URL? On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, James Downs wrote: > > > > > > On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai wrote: > > > > > style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain. > > > > Nad Cog? > > > datacenterops.org is sti

Re: Branch Location Over The Internet

On Aug 11, 2015 11:22 AM, "Colton Conor" wrote: > > We have an enterprise that has a headquarter office with redundant fiber > connections, its own ASN, its own /22 IP block from ARIN, and a couple of > gigabit internet connections from multiple providers. The office is taking > full BGP routes fr

Re: Branch Location Over The Internet

sophus utm is the ideal technology for this requirement and vmware image works well for virtual device colin Sent from my iPhone > On 11 Aug 2015, at 19:21, Colton Conor wrote: > > We have an enterprise that has a headquarter office with redundant fiber > connections, its own ASN, its own /22

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

On Tue Aug 11, 2015 at 01:35:28pm -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote: > Absolutely feel free to use it; I haven't seen a single message on it in... > well, it was 3 years ago I was in datacenters regularly, so I'm goin with > "3 years". :-) There's a message there now... :) Rather than fragmenting furthe

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

Nothing is currently running on that domain. It is just available if you make the right offer to purchase it. Robert On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:49:33 -0500 Rafael Possamai wrote: What is the mailman URL? On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Marcin Cieslak wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, James Dow

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

Marcin Cieslak wrote: O datacenterops.org is still available *hint*hint* ~Marcin Doesn't look likes it's available any more. In terms of building a critical mass, there do seem to be a goodly number of data center types on: various forums at webhostingtalk.com (probably) some of the suppor

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

hi nanog On 08/11/15 at 04:46pm, Alex Brooks wrote: > With the lack of interest compared to NANOG (especially seeing how the > old list simply dried up) it might be best making the list global > rather than North America only to get the traffic levels up a bit. there used to be an active "isp-xx

RE: Cogent revisited

Thank you to those who replied off-list, for the helpful replies! The feedback basically ranged from neutral (maybe a little positive) to really negative. The main emphasis being on: use them only if you are redundant. Seems like things haven’t changed much since 2012. Thanks! On

Re: Branch Location Over The Internet

EoIP seems to be what I am looking for, however this recent Mikrotik session says: EoIP could be a solution for tunneling L2 over L3. • EoIP disadvantages: – Fragmentation of L2 frames over multiple L3 packets – Performance issues • VPLS advantages: – No fragmentation. – 60% more performance then

Re: Branch Location Over The Internet

Eoip is Mikrotik only Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 11, 2015 6:28 PM, "Colton Conor" wrote: > EoIP seems to be what I am looking for, however this recent Mikrotik > session says: > > EoIP could be a solution for tunneling L2

AW: Branch Location Over The Internet

Hi, Some facts: Dell R300, 1x Xeon CPU (Quadcore, 2,6GHz) 8GB Memory Intel X520 10G NIC RouterOS x86 installation (that’s the OS from the Mikrotik Routerboards) Max transfer-rate via EoIP: ~5,7GBit/s If you plan to use jumbo frames (everything with an payload >1500 byte): yes, packets will be

Re: Branch Location Over The Internet

DMVPN is very flexible, and is designed for this type of scenario. Cisco definitely supports it. Not sure about Juniper, but its essentially mGRE + NHRP. You can use IPSec to encrypt the tunnels, and if you require spoke-to-spoke connectivity, there are some optimizations in Phase-3 DMVPN that make

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

On 8/11/2015 3:27 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote: > On Tue Aug 11, 2015 at 01:35:28pm -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote: >> Absolutely feel free to use it; I haven't seen a single message on it in... >> well, it was 3 years ago I was in datacenters regularly, so I'm goin with >> "3 years". :-) > > There's a me

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

The list just went live at "lists.nadcog.org". I am open to any suggestions, just let me know. When you say move forward with the concept, do you mean get the organization started as well, not just the mailing list? Thanks, Rafael On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Mike wrote: > On 8/11/2015 3:

Re: Branch Location Over The Internet

EoIP will tunnel over anything IP, including the public Internet. VPLS will only go over your network. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Colton Conor"

advice dealing with clean-mx

hello I've lurked on this list for a while - I have an issue that I need help with. I work for a company that does fraud detection we host our servers on physica hardware in managed hosting datacenters (softlayer, hertzer, coresites, etc). Recently we were flagged for malware buy clean-mx. It wa

Re: advice dealing with clean-mx

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Follow-up off-list. - - ferg On 8/11/2015 7:06 PM, Michael Bubb wrote: > hello > > I've lurked on this list for a while - I have an issue that I need > help with. > > I work for a company that does fraud detection we host our servers > on phy

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

> Rather than fragmenting further, I'd suggest building up demand first > on existing infrastructure. If it gets to the size of NANOG and > needing a support organisation around it, then it can split off > then... no! we need committees, and different colored badges, and web sites, and deadlines,

Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions

I have not experienced any problems with multiple source attacks at the same time. This is also including with multiple destinations too. I guess it really depends on what you expect the product to do, and how you write integration too. Regards, Matt. On 12/08/2015 01:42, Aaron wrote: We te

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

Haha, are you saying some people out there put nanog on their resume? I thought 2008 was long gone. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > Rather than fragmenting further, I'd suggest building up demand first > > on existing infrastructure. If it gets to the size of NANOG and >

Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions

Aaron, Do you remember which release or when it was ? Are you talking about detection or filtering which failed for many sources targeting a single destination ? Which sensor did you test, packet sensor or flow sensor ? Thank, Regards, - Marcel On 11.08.2015 17:42, Aaron wrote: We tested it

Re: Cogent revisited

On 11/Aug/15 16:00, Adam Greene wrote: > > > Have opinions changed since then? Or is Cogent still the "budget alternative > to have in your mix, but better to stay away from if you need > high-performance, reliable, mostly standalone bandwidth" (which is how I > would summarize the consensus in

router dump and config

[ uncast reply please, unless you just wanna tell me to foad publicly, which is fine ] purely for research, and we promise to destroy after. would appreciate one router config (passwords/credentials removed, of course) rib dump from that router (we can process C or J) which has a number o

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

On 11/Aug/15 17:46, Alex Brooks wrote: > With the lack of interest compared to NANOG (especially seeing how the > old list simply dried up) it might be best making the list global > rather than North America only to get the traffic levels up a bit. Tend to agree that a list with global scope mig