On 6/23/15, 9:01 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Ca By" wrote:
>Since you have failed to achieve in the modest task that was your charge
>
>You now get this
>
>https://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1471
Time to watch this again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v26BAlfWBm8
Lee
>
>Or s/money/addre
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 9:24 AM, Lee Howard wrote:
>
> On 6/23/15, 9:01 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Ca By" on behalf of cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Since you have failed to achieve in the modest task that was your charge
>>
>> You now get this
>>
>> https://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/14
Hi,
Any Level3 NOC contacts on the list? Our link in Irvine has been on and
off for few minutes already. Would appreciate replies offline..
Thanks!
-nathan
As someone rightly pointed out "ARIN now down to 0.00978 /8s in aggregate."
> or this
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y36fG2Oba0
so this is more appropriate "I suppose we'd better give it a try"
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:04:09PM -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:46 PM, John Musbach
>> wrote:
>> I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jersey for a tech job. To my
>> astonishment, I discovered that there appears to be a Verizon
>> datacenter near my house that ha
Thank you all for your responses.
This was exactly the kind of information and opinions I was hoping to find-
way better than reading tea leaves!
I hear the Supreme Court just ruled IPv6 legal in all states...
What does this mean for the backward people who have been steadily
resisting deploying the current version of the Internet Protocol?
Drive Slow,
Paul
>There was signing of NDAs
Which you obviously read and follow to the letter ;)
alan
On Fri Jun 26, 2015 at 09:26:53AM -0500, Doug McIntyre wrote:
> I guess VZ thought the colo was ultimately to stand alone without
> talking to anybody. And they are a communications company.
And there-in lies the answer to your question. They're a communications
company. They want to sell you com
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Doug McIntyre wrote:
> Then it was announced ready to move in, and we asked the procedure to
> get cross-connects from outside the facility in (really the whole
> point of even getting colo there).
>
> Oh no, you can't have a cross-connect.
>
> Umm, the only reaso
AFAIK theres no longer any way to get their attention unless you're a
customer AND have signed up for their online portal system at
https://my.level3.com/ - and I wouldn't expect anything stellar
then either. You'll likely have to do your own troubleshooting through them
as my recent experiences ha
On Jun 22, 2015 6:14 PM, "William Herrin" wrote:
>
>
> Two-way satellite systems based on SV's in geostationary orbit (like
> the two you're considering) have high latency. 22,000 miles out,
> another 22,000 miles back and do it again for the return packet.
Just a minor nitpick - that's 22,300 m
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:19 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2015 6:14 PM, "William Herrin" wrote:
>> Two-way satellite systems based on SV's in geostationary orbit (like
>> the two you're considering) have high latency. 22,000 miles out,
>> another 22,000 miles back and do it again for the
The portal should have some stats where you can do basic troubleshooting.
It's really easy to get registered on the portal, you just need account
number and customer name (which is scary, but go figure...).
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Michael Loftis wrote:
> AFAIK theres no longer any
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> If you want to nitpick. ;)
Well, if you are going to nitpick, the earth is modeled more
closely (but still not precisely) as an oblate spheroid than a
true sphere.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
> If you would like to see how Google has your geolocation set, check:
> curl http://redirector.c.youtube.com/report_mapping
It looks like HTTPS is broken for redirector.c.youtube.com
Bell Canada is apparently gearing up to provide the good people of Toronto with
the World's Fastest Internet™.
http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/06/25/bell-canada-to-give-toronto-worlds-fastest-internet.html
They needed to do this. Rogers is already offering higher speeds.
At 02:04 PM 26/06/2015, Hank Disuko wrote:
Bell Canada is apparently gearing up to provide
the good people of Toronto with the World's Fastest Internet.
http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/06/25/bell-canada-to-give-tor
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For hi
Nice try Bell.. So-Net did it two years ago, 2Gbps FTTH in Japan.
Article: http://bgr.com/2013/06/13/so-net-nuro-2gbps-fiber-service/
If you read Japanese: http://www.nuro.jp/hikari/
Eric
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Hank Disuko
Sent: June
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
going from 50mbps to 1gbps doesn't necessarily increase your average
transfer rate, at least I don't think it would for me. Anyone care to
comment? Ju
But what about us in Northwestern Ontario who can only get dialup, if that,
from Bell?
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Eric Dugas wrote:
>
> Nice try Bell.. So-Net did it two years ago, 2Gbps FTTH in Japan.
>
> Article: http://bgr.com/2013/06/13/so-net-nuro-2gbps-fiber-service/
>
> If you read
Its mostly marketing, a number of years ago I worked for a cable co, we
knew if we increased BW X we'd see a Y speed increase in usage. We also
has done the math on several future generations of upgrades, so we'd know
if "phone company" increases to A we'd move to B. I know the guy that did
the m
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Rafael Possamai wrote:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
going from 50mbps to 1gbps doesn't necessarily increase your average
transfer rate, at least I don't th
Parkinson's law of sorts? Use expanding to fill the bandwidth available
One kid with a torrent downloading random stuff, streaming hd and music off the
internet etc and a family of four can make decent inroads into gigabit or so I
would have thought
Don't even start counting say a gb here and
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, jim deleskie wrote:
Its mostly marketing, a number of years ago I worked for a cable co, we
knew if we increased BW X we'd see a Y speed increase in usage. We also
has done the math on several future generations of upgrades, so we'd
know if "phone company" increases to A
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 11:40 AM, TR Shaw wrote:
>
> But what about us in Northwestern Ontario who can only get dialup, if that,
> from Bell?
Seriously - write to your MP and MLA.
Landon Stewart
landonstew...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Like Peter Lothberg's mother's home :)
--srs
> On 27-Jun-2015, at 12:22 am, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> And yes, "fastest Internet in the world" is pure BS, gigabit ethernet access
> to peoples homes have been around for years in other places
On 26 June 2015 at 11:04, Hank Disuko wrote:
> Bell Canada is apparently gearing up to provide the good people of Toronto
> with the World's Fastest Internet™.
> http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/06/25/bell-canada-to-give-toronto-worlds-fastest-internet.html
Only 1Gbps?!
LOL, but US In
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Rafael Possamai wrote:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
going from 50mbps to 1gbps doesn't necessarily increase your average
transfer rate, at least I don't th
Personally I think it's pure marketing ... something I think we all know...
I seen a few years back a FTTH development get completed using GPON -
everything in the area got "Full Gig Internet". Speedtest while I was onsite
showed about 900Mb/s download so pretty darn close (before they fully de
On 06/26/2015 12:03 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Personally I think it's pure marketing ... something I think we all
know...
I seen a few years back a FTTH development get completed using GPON -
everything in the area got "Full Gig Internet". Speedtest while I
was onsite showed about 900Mb/s downloa
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 13:39 -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
> How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
> it is overkill.
This sentiment keeps popping up. It's a failure of vision. To suggest
that "single people" or "ordinary people" or any other set of presumably
a
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 13:02 , Karl Auer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 13:39 -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
>> How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
>> it is overkill.
>
> This sentiment keeps popping up. It's a failure of vision. To suggest
> that "single
That comment was made from a customer perspective (myself) while I wonder
if I ever would wanna pay for it, although it seems like it's pretty cheap
already. As an entrepreneur, business, etc... then yes, I agree. Shoot for
the stars and land on the moon. :)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Karl
Your right. Actually, Bell knows that home does not need that much BW, Bell
size their network for much less than that. However, from a marketing
perspective, when Bell says to a client I am offering you 1G at $100 and
competition are offering you 30M at $60, some clients likes that because they
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:06:26PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > On Jun 26, 2015, at 13:02 , Karl Auer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 13:39 -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
> >> How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
> >> it is overkill.
> >
> > This se
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:30:05PM -0400, A MEKKAOUI wrote:
> Your right. Actually, Bell knows that home does not need that much
> BW, Bell size their network for much less than that. However, from a
> marketing perspective, when Bell says to a client I am offering you
> 1G at $100 and competition
> How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use?
we once asked how a home user would use 56kb, how anyone needed more
than 640k in a pee cee, how we would need more than 32 bits in an
address.
the only thing not rising is water levels. except the ocean, that is.
randy
Some of those are why would one EVER need more than X, while others are why
would one NOW need more than X. Big difference. Simple fact that there is no
residential application that needs more than even 50 megabit much less 10,000
megabit.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solution
We recently had to pull some year over year statistics on consumption
for a regulatory filing.
In 2009, our average customer used 11G of data. This year it is
85G. In 5 years it could be 400G or more.
What's worse is, OTT video means that consumption is more than likely
going to be at p
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:01:38PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Some of those are why would one EVER need more than X, while others are why
> would one NOW need more than X. Big difference. Simple fact that there is
> no residential application that needs more than even 50 megabit much less
> 10,00
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Robert Seastrom
wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 11:34 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>> I'm told second hand that when MCI/worldcom (now Verizon Business)
>> controlled 8100 Boone Blvd (the early MAE-East) you had to buy a data
>> circuit from them to get between floors.
On 26/Jun/15 23:11, mikea wrote:
> Define "need". On the average, I probably don't need more than 56 KBaud,
> integrated over all the years I've been linked to the 'Net from home. Would I
> be willing to put up with it? Hell, no! Would I be willing to put up with 10
> Gig to the house for what I'
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> Some of those are why would one EVER need more than X, while others are why
> would one NOW need more than X. Big difference. Simple fact that there is no
> residential application that needs more than even 50 megabit much less 10,000
>
The issue here is economics. 1G hardware is cheap, as in sub-$100 for
a 1G CPE with SMF in one side and RJ45 out the other.
Even if you decide to limit yourself at 100m or similar, if you build it at the
optics side, it is more expensive than building at 1G.
Because of this, 1G is the most sensi
In message
, Rafael Possamai writes:
> How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
> it is overkill. Similar to the concept of price elasticity in economics,
> going from 50mbps to 1gbps doesn't necessarily increase your average
> transfer rate, at least I don't th
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 26 21:17:55 2015 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 18-Jun-15 -to- 25-Jun-15 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9829 295162 5.8% 293.4 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet
Backbone,IN
2 - AS11139
On 26/Jun/15 23:56, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately ISP's have made it about link speed rather than what
> it really is about because link speed was the limiting factor.
When 1Gbps becomes mainstream to the home, I think it will stop being
about link speed (well, for a while anyway, beca
It’s not just about the transfer rate, though.
As has been noted, response times at peak congestion are definitely faster if
you have more bandwidth.
So if you’ve got 3 kids all wanting to stream different HD5k content, 50Mbits
is going to get interesting.
100Mbps will probably handle it with e
Good points. But just like I won't take more than one shower at a time, I
probably won't watch more than one Netflix stream session at a time
(assuming that for myself only). Downloading a large ISO image in seconds
is definitely a plus, although at the office I never reach a steady 120MB/s
from so
10Gbps inside the home at an economical price for the phys means IP Multicast
can finally be a viable alternative (replacement for) HDMI.
No more will you connect one Blu-Ray player to One Amp to One TV. You’ll just
connect them all to ethernet.
Amps and TVs will have UIs which allow you to sub
On 26 Jun 2015, at 15:04, Hank Disuko wrote:
Bell Canada is apparently gearing up to provide the good people of
Toronto with the World's Fastest Internet™.
http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/06/25/bell-canada-to-give-toronto-worlds-fastest-internet.html
Bell Canada is in the busines
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jersey for a tech job. To my
>> astonishment, I discovered that there appears to be a Verizon
>> datacenter near my house tha
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jersey for a tech job. To my
>>> astonishment, I discover
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:36 PM, John Musbach wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach
>>> wrote:
Hello,
I'm a techie that recently mov
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:40 PM, John Musbach
wrote:
> .
>
> P.S. If there was any way to get a tour inside of there at least I'd
> totally sign a NDA for that. :) Never been inside, let alone near, a
> CO before.
>
http://museumofcommunications.org/?page_id=12
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip,
On 6/26/2015 19:44, Joe Hamelin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:40 PM, John Musbach
wrote:
.
P.S. If there was any way to get a tour inside of there at least I'd
totally sign a NDA for that. :) Never been inside, let alone near, a
CO before.
http://museumofcommunications.org/?page_id=12
On 6/26/2015 20:31, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 6/26/2015 19:44, Joe Hamelin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:40 PM, John Musbach
wrote:
.
P.S. If there was any way to get a tour inside of there at least I'd
totally sign a NDA for that. :) Never been inside, let alone near, a
CO before.
htt
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:32 PM, John Musbach wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jersey for a tech job. To my
>>> astonishment, I discovered tha
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Paul Stewart wrote:
The interesting part was that the development consisted of 4400 active
users the last time I heard but the bandwidth to upstream provider was
still only a single GigE and was not hitting serious saturation levels
most of the time.
I'd say for any kind
And that's the ballgame.
http://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/3b5p3i/arin_just_subdivided_their_last_1718192021_and_22/
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
27. Jun 2015 03:06 by j...@baylink.com:
> And that's the ballgame.
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/3b5p3i/arin_just_subdivided_their_last_1718192021_and_22
>
And here's to another eternity of shitty ISPs not implementing IPv6 because
'they have enough v4 already'.
On 15-06-26 09:47 PM, tqr2813d376cjozqa...@tutanota.com wrote:
27. Jun 2015 03:06 by j...@baylink.com:
And that's the ballgame.
http://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/3b5p3i/arin_just_subdivided_their_last_1718192021_and_22
And here's to another eternity of shitty ISPs not implementing IPv6
On 6/26/2015 7:26 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 26 Jun 2015, at 15:04, Hank Disuko wrote:
Bell Canada is apparently gearing up to provide the good people of
Toronto with the World's Fastest Internet™.
http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/06/25/bell-canada-to-give-toronto-worlds-fastest-interne
66 matches
Mail list logo
