On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Soultimately, what's the answer? A huge number of low cost, low
>> power WAPs? Eager readers want to know. :)
>
> what was unclear about the following?
+1
> Randy Bush wrote:
>> From: Randy Bush
>> Subject: Re: Whats' a good produ
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:06 AM, wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 19:06:29 -0400, Jay Ashworth said:
[snip]
> I'll let the perpetrator, Richard Stallman, explain. It was a kerfluffle
> regarding whether /bin/du should use units of 1,000 or 1024.
>
> http://karmak.org/archive/2003/01/12-14-99.epl.html
What gear was used at the last NANOG in SF? Was it indeed Xirrus?
-Mike
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> Soultimately, what's the answer? A huge number of low cost, low
> >> power WAPs? Eager readers want to k
> What gear was used at the last NANOG in SF? Was it indeed Xirrus?
yes. but i would not blame the gear
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> What gear was used at the last NANOG in SF? Was it indeed Xirrus?
>
> yes. but i would not blame the gear
I would blame some of the gear. Very bad bufferbloat (up to 1.5 sec of
latency) on the download direction.
http://snapon.lab.bufferblo
> What you need is more APs running at lower poer levels to cover
> smaller areas, spread out around the room.
lots of other trix. some of which i have seen are
o pull the asians off on to one or more channel 14 aps (but that's
old 11b days).
o set the aps low so the wetware attenuates
b
On 06/20/2015 11:56 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
Waaay to many variables to answer the question. Each deployment is
different and requires proper engineering and experience...
And a good description of the problem, too, as I learned the hard way
trying to work with the IT people for a Ruckus installat
> On Jun 21, 2015, at 1:28 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> My understanding is that the most recent NANOG had issues with clients
>> picking channels sequentially vs by signal strength. There may have
>> been other issues but when all devices use 149 because that's the
>> first they can and they get
Stephen Satchell writes:
> ... They just couldn't believe that 300 people could max out their system
> ...
> Last year, the group AVERAGED four devices each.
A *camping* event that I go to, that is by and large not a
technology-oriented consituency, averaged 2.6 devices per
attendee.
-r
- Original Message -
> From: "Jimmy Hess"
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:06 AM, wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 19:06:29 -0400, Jay Ashworth said:
> [snip]
> > I'll let the perpetrator, Richard Stallman, explain. It was a
> > kerfluffle
> > regarding whether /bin/du should use units of 1,000
No wonder IPv4 is depleted. People's shoes have a MAC address nowadays...
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
> Stephen Satchell writes:
>
> > ... They just couldn't believe that 300 people could max out their system
> > ...
> > Last year, the group AVERAGED four devices each
Hello All,
Was wondering what folks are using to monitor traffic
on their networks. Looking into Ixia and APCON devices for dedup and
other filtering features as well as passive fiber TAPs to capture the
traffic.
How are folks handling TAP'ing large data center
networks? TAPs at the "distri
On 20 Jun 2015, at 9:37, Sina Owolabi wrote:
I'd be grateful for any information on how to calculate for large
scale
wifi deployment
[snip]
While it is vendor specific (and therefore subject to certain biases)
I’ve found the Aruba VRD (Validated Reference Design) documentation
fairly clea
And Aruba also did a kick-ass wireless installation at the new Levi's
Stadium in Santa Clara. Here is a White Paper on it:
http://arubanetworks.com/wp-content/uploads/stadiumRFfund.pdf
-Mike
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:51 AM, John Todd wrote:
>
> On 20 Jun 2015, at 9:37, Sina Owolabi wrote:
>
Ultimately this is one of the things that SDN schemes such as OpenFlow bring a
data center for free. Distributed flow statistics collection through OenFlow's
extensible infrastructure gives you a huge range of reporting and analysis
capabilities, with no taps needed. Every network port is in ess
I recently visited that installation. It's quite impressive and we are
employing the "down-low" AP placement strategy on another high density project.
The scheme uses human RF attenuation to enable closer AP spacing, which in turn
supports a higher channel re-use ratio.
-mel beckman
> On Jun
They also have an awesome DAS installation there as well.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> I recently visited that installation. It's quite impressive and we are
> employing the "down-low" AP placement strategy on another high density
> project. The scheme uses human RF att
Hi!
I apologize if this is not something I should have posted here, but I've
come to value the insights and experience of the people on this list a lot,
and I am hoping my problem isn't unique. I am also sorry for the long read.
I have been to the forums of the devices in play in this problem, an
This has all been a very huge help, and I am thankful for all the insights
and reading material. I fee expert already!
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:14 AM Mike Lyon wrote:
> They also have an awesome DAS installation there as well.
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
>
> > I re
> This has all been a very huge help, and I am thankful for all the
> insights and reading material. I feel expert already!
then you should be very scared
randy, who has been doing it for years and knows he is a weenie
Well now. Being scared is part of the insight :-)
And until I see a "No!!! Don't do it!!" post...
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:10 AM Randy Bush wrote:
> > This has all been a very huge help, and I am thankful for all the
> > insights and reading material. I feel expert already!
>
> then you should
21 matches
Mail list logo
