Here is Cisco's reply!
“Given PCEP’s main use-case is inter-area TE tunnels (or SDN controller in
TE environment) and ASR1K is not marketed for TE, support is unlikely”
What is .. "not marketed for TE"?!
All in all, I don't mind replacing them with some cheaper, powerful, flexible
and SDN-read
Blair Trosper writes:
> MaxMind (a great product)
I've heard anecdotal accounts of MaxMind intentionally marking all
address blocks assigned to a VPN vendor as "open proxy" even when
advised repeatedly that the disputed addresses (a) had no VPN services
running on them either inbound or outboun
We operate IPv6 tunnel broker tb.netassist.ua, so /48 from our /32 is
spread all around the world.
Google change geo of our WHOLE /32 from time to time to another cute
random place ;) One time Google decided we are in IRAN and block a lot
of content as "not available in your country" o_O
Unfortunat
On Apr 8, 2015 7:19 AM, "Rob Seastrom" wrote:
>
>
> Blair Trosper writes:
>
> > MaxMind (a great product)
>
> I've heard anecdotal accounts of MaxMind intentionally marking all
> address blocks assigned to a VPN vendor as "open proxy" even when
> advised repeatedly that the disputed addresses (a)
On 2015-04-08 13:31, Max Tulyev wrote:
> We operate IPv6 tunnel broker tb.netassist.ua, so /48 from our /32 is
> spread all around the world.
> Google change geo of our WHOLE /32 from time to time to another cute
> random place ;) One time Google decided we are in IRAN and block a lot
> of content
> That all said: Restricting content based on location is complete and
> utter nonsense in 2015. The world is global, people want to pay for
> content and the content owners just don't allow people to pay for it.
Globalisation is for your corporate lords and masters to buy labour and raw
material
Globalisation only works if network abuse and network contacts follow best
practice and engage.
Else trade blocks and network country blocks are done and remain in place until
certain countries ethically/practically do the right thing.
Colin
> On 8 Apr 2015, at 13:17, Tim Franklin wrote:
>
>>
One of the downsides to having four (at least) different control plane
operating systems across your product lines.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: "Mohamed Kamal"
Sent: 4/8/2015 5:13 AM
To: "NANOG"
Subject: Re: Cisco's IOS-XE and PCEP implementation
Here is Cisco's reply!
“Given PC
On 04/08/15 14:56, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> That stated, properly providing a WHOIS entry for each prefix
> (inetnum/inet6num) is a good idea as that kind of indicates that that
> prefix is fixed in that location and not just moving around.
[skip]
> Do make sure though that you do not show any fore
shawn wilson writes:
> On Apr 8, 2015 7:19 AM, "Rob Seastrom" <[[r...@seastrom.com]]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Blair Trosper <[[blair.tros...@gmail.com]]> writes:
>>
>> > MaxMind (a great product)
>>
>> I've heard anecdotal accounts of MaxMind intentionally marking all
>> address blocks assigned to a VPN
Yes, indeed! Things like VPLS, full-features ESI and PCEP exist on
IOS-XR but not IOS and IOS-XE!
ISSU and HA operates differently between IOS-XE and NX-OS!
Their claim is not even logical, the ASR1k is supporting 600 TE tunnels
head-end, and up-to 10k midpoint! So, if I had an average of 30 ASR1
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 05/04/2015 03:32, Robert Seastrom wrote:
>> As you may know if you've played around with recent Apple Airports
>> (Express at least) in bridge mode with "guest network" turned on, they
>> seem to know about 802.1q and have fairly reasonable
Hi,
There is something like this on market ? Looking for standalone switch,
1/2U, ca 40 ports 10Gb/s and about 4 ports 100Gb/s fixed or as a module.
regards,
Peter
The Juniper QFX10002-36Q has 36 40GbE Ports. They can be broken out to up to
144 10GbE ports, or 1/3 of them can be used for 100GbE.
So, if you use 6 100GbE ports and still have 72 10GbE ports.
I have not seen one of these yet in person, but it is the smallest form factor
I know of that has t
I did see these switches at SC14.
http://www.corsa.com/products/dp6440/
Thanks,
-Roy Hockett
Network Architect,
ITS Communications Systems and Data Centers
University of Michigan
Tel: (734) 763-7325
Fax: (734) 615-1727
email: roy...@umich.edu
On Apr 8, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Piotr wrote:
> Hi,
>
Cisco Nexus 7700 2 slot chassis supports 48 x 10 Gbps, 24 x 40 Gbps, and 12 x
100 Gbps.
It is 3RU. Part number is N77-C7702.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Piotr
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 3:02 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: 100Gb/s T
If you can wait, you will see the market flooded with 32x100G with the
ability to down-clock to 40g / breakout to 4x10g in the Q3/Q4 timeframe ;)
John-Nicholas Furst
Hardware Engineer
Office: +1.617.274.7212
Akamai Technologies
150 Broadway
Cambridge, MA 02142
On 4/8/15, 3:37 PM, "Hockett,
On Apr 8, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I do wish they had bufferbloat-fighting queue managment on the ISP
> side, it is otherwise
> pretty good hardware.
As you're well aware since your name is in the acknowledgements, there's been
some effort in this direction at CL. If the problem g
7700 2 slot looks to only support 1 line card, so 48x10 *or* 12x100
thanks,
-Randy
- On Apr 8, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Klimakhin, Kirill
kirill.klimak...@corebts.com wrote:
> Cisco Nexus 7700 2 slot chassis supports 48 x 10 Gbps, 24 x 40 Gbps, and 12 x
> 100 Gbps.
>
> It is 3RU. Part number is
That is correct, I didn’t mean that it supports all three. Only one of the
three combinations.
Regards,
Kirill
-Original Message-
From: Randy Carpenter [mailto:rcar...@network1.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 4:23 PM
To: Klimakhin, Kirill
Cc: Piotr; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: 100
25/50/100 stuff should start coming out around soon, as well, which may drive
pricing down even more.
thanks,
-Randy
- On Apr 8, 2015, at 3:43 PM, Furst, John-Nicholas jofu...@akamai.com wrote:
> If you can wait, you will see the market flooded with 32x100G with the
> ability to down-clo
I work at a state REN and we are seeking a lead for a new edge device for
on prem deployment at customer sites.
We currently deploy two classes of routers-- a high end and a low end. Both
the high end and the low end use some of the standard edge features:
MPLS-TE, MBGP, flowspec, vrf, PIM, etc. W
Mikrotik for OS, and Hardware choice would be to use an X86 appliance (Lanner
Electronics, Axiomtek etc)
You should be able to get a cost effective box that will meet your performance
requirements.
As to feature set, while most of them are their you should do some testing to
see if feature set m
No MPLS though, if that is a requirement.
On 04/08/2015 05:11 PM, Tim Raphael wrote:
VyOS is a community fork of Vyatta and is still being developed very actively
and it pushing ahead with many new features! It's pretty stable too imo.
http://vyos.net/wiki/Main_Page
Regards,
Tim Raphael
On
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Robert Seastrom wrote:
> I'd really like to try these native IPv6 tests with my Verizon FIOS at home,
> but I think I already know the outcome...
you are cracking me up. srsly.
v6 on fios? that'll be the day.
VyOS is a community fork of Vyatta and is still being developed very actively
and it pushing ahead with many new features! It's pretty stable too imo.
http://vyos.net/wiki/Main_Page
Regards,
Tim Raphael
> On 9 Apr 2015, at 8:14 am, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
>
> Mikrotik for OS, and Hardware choic
Is it a necessity to terminate the layer 3 at the edge? You could get a
10Gbps switch and move it all back to a central location where you have
your high end routers. It would then be terminated as a VLAN and be a
router on a stick kind of topology. Could be a cheaper way to do it without
taking MP
Hello Piotr,
You can always take a look at :
- Arista :
http://www.arista.com/en/products/7280e-series
- Brocade :
http://www.brocade.com/products/all/switches/product-details/vdx-6940-switch/index.page
HTH.
BR.
> Le 8 avr. 2015 à 21:01, Piotr a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> There is something l
When will Tomahawk switches be available?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Marian Ďurkovič wrote:
> Wait for switches with BCM Tomahawk ASICs.
>
> They'll support exactly what you're looking for.
>
>M.
>
>
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 21:01:59 +0200, Piotr wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is something li
Mikrotik? I believe they support all these features other than maybe
flowspec, and you can get a box with a 10G SFP+ port for around $500.
On 8 April 2015 at 23:46, Daniel Rohan wrote:
> I work at a state REN and we are seeking a lead for a new edge device for
> on prem deployment at customer sit
Correct. But hopefully not far off now that there are x86 packages for simple
MPLS operations. With a bit of luck an RSVP or LDP implementation isn't far
behind.
Regards,
Tim Raphael
> On 9 Apr 2015, at 9:14 am, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> No MPLS though, if that is a requirement.
>
>> On 04/0
Wait for switches with BCM Tomahawk ASICs.
They'll support exactly what you're looking for.
M.
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 21:01:59 +0200, Piotr wrote
> Hi,
>
> There is something like this on market ? Looking for standalone switch,
> 1/2U, ca 40 ports 10Gb/s and about 4 ports 100Gb/s fixed or as
Woops, missed the full tables requirement there.. Never mind.
On Apr 8, 2015 4:18 PM, "Tim Jackson" wrote:
> Cisco ASR902 or Juniper ACX..
> On Apr 8, 2015 3:48 PM, "Daniel Rohan" wrote:
>
>> I work at a state REN and we are seeking a lead for a new edge device for
>> on prem deployment at custo
If referring to cavium xpa's hitting the oem's lines, next year or so I'm
guessing.
Bob Watson
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 9:01 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> From which vendors?
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Furst, John-Nicholas
> wrote:
>
>> If you can wait, you will see the market flood
I think Brocade has one already announced. It might be based off the Trident2+
though, I can't remember. Either way, in 6 months everyone will have 1RU
switches with 100G uplinks like they have 40G now.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: "Colton Conor"
Sent: 4/8/2015 9:58 PM
To: "Mari
Cisco ASR902 or Juniper ACX..
On Apr 8, 2015 3:48 PM, "Daniel Rohan" wrote:
> I work at a state REN and we are seeking a lead for a new edge device for
> on prem deployment at customer sites.
>
> We currently deploy two classes of routers-- a high end and a low end. Both
> the high end and the lo
>From which vendors?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Furst, John-Nicholas
wrote:
> If you can wait, you will see the market flooded with 32x100G with the
> ability to down-clock to 40g / breakout to 4x10g in the Q3/Q4 timeframe ;)
>
>
> John-Nicholas Furst
> Hardware Engineer
>
>
> Office: +1.61
Everyone. These should also support 25/50G Ethernet.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: "Colton Conor"
Sent: 4/8/2015 10:01 PM
To: "Furst, John-Nicholas"
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch
>From which vendors?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Furst, John-Nicholas
w
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Robert Seastrom wrote:
>
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> I do wish they had bufferbloat-fighting queue managment on the ISP
>> side, it is otherwise
>> pretty good hardware.
Again, I LOVE the apple gear - with stuart cheshire the godfather of
t
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Tim Raphael wrote:
> Correct. But hopefully not far off now that there are x86 packages for simple
> MPLS operations. With a bit of luck an RSVP or LDP implementation isn't far
> behind.
Just sitting around whining and waiting for someone else to do the job
is no
Dan, The new asr920 by cisco would fit 4x10g SFP+ and 24 ports SFP or copper
1g line rate about 6 k list without license . You can leverage netconf yang
model as its cisco edge or other flavor choice
You can unicast if you want more data as we've done EFI and evaluated them in
our labs
Bo
41 matches
Mail list logo
