On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> This assumes that Copyright is the only IP protection out there. There
> are actually two distinct realms of IP protection afforded in the US.
Actually, there are four: copyright, patent, trademark and trade
secret. A network configuration c
On 2/15/2015 8:57 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
This assumes that Copyright is the only IP protection out there. There
are actually two distinct realms of IP protection afforded in the US.
Actually, there are four: copyright, patent, trademark a
Hello, I don't mean to hijack this thread, but I suppose its related -- I
didn't know spamhaus could provide a BGP feed of "bad" prefixes like that (for
a price it seems). Is anyone aware of other "free" providers of such naughty
prefixes via BGP? I know Team Cymru has a bogon list that you can
We have several of them in service for almost 18 months now. Overall I'm
happy with them, but I have had some minor issues.
I had an issue where DHCP Option 82 information was incorrect and support
had a new firmware fix within 72 hours.
When trying to access the oldest events in the detailed sys
http://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/2vxj9u/very_elegant_and_a_simple_way_to_secure_bfd/
Authentication mechanisms defined for IGPs cannot be used to protect BFD
since the rate at which packets are processed in BFD is very high.
Dave
Is this still in use? I am trying to setup an account but the account creation
process seems broken. I may be late to the party but it looks like a really
cool idea assuming people still use it and its active.
On (2015-02-15 21:34 +0530), Dave Waters wrote:
Hey,
> http://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/2vxj9u/very_elegant_and_a_simple_way_to_secure_bfd/
>
> Authentication mechanisms defined for IGPs cannot be used to protect BFD
> since the rate at which packets are processed in BFD is very high.
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 09:53:46 -0600, Jack Bates said:
> want IP; legal protection). One way around this, most likely, is to
> establish your art as public domain (allowing you continued use of the
> foundation work, while losing the more specific details associated with
> that one project). By doin
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Colin Bodor wrote:
> Is this still in use? I am trying to setup an account but the account
> creation process seems broken. I may be late to the party but it looks like a
> really cool idea assuming people still use it and its active.
It’s still in very active u
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> We’ve been focusing on completing our already-started transition from SER to
> BE6K on the back-end
Sorry, prototyping in BE6K, production will be BE7K.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed w
On 2/15/2015 09:53, Jack Bates wrote:
Most engineers know when they've crossed the line from trivial/mundane
into creative. It tends to be linked to our pride.
I wish it did not so often be driven by the thought that this may be an
opportunity to game the system for personal gain.
--
The u
Hi Dan and ken.
I respect your great works.
Certainly, our scenario was network classics and it just does not "one size
fits all" network architecture.
Many people tried to built centralized and decentralized networks many
years ago, some guys output
implementation like this.
Interconnect of K
>
>
>
> I wonder if Trio, EZChip and friends could do SHA in NPU, my guess is yes
> they
> could, but perhaps there is even more appropriate hash for this use-case.
> I'm not entirely convinced doing hash for each BFD packet is impractical.
>
> [0] http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mahesh-bfd-authentica
Emails to what I thought were CenturyLink's NOC have gone unanswered, and
the other email address resulted in an automated "you're not allowed to send
emails to that group".
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 8:22 AM
To: netw...@centurytel.net; 'n
14 matches
Mail list logo
