On 2014-12-27 17:27, Tarko Tikan wrote:
> Split-horizon (switchport protected in Cisco world). Customers can't send
> packets directly to each other, all communication has to go via BNG router.
> Obviously we protect L2 as well like limiting number of MACs per customers,
> make sure BNG MAC cannot
On 2014-12-27 17:37, Enno Rey wrote:
> true, but some (most) of them only apply in networks where multicasting/ND is
> fully supported which is not necessarily the case in the above type of
> networks.
Yes. I'm aware of the various types of solutions for security in IPv6 with
shared VLANs. I was
hey,
I assume you have a star-network below the BNG? Ie no rings or similar in the
access network?
Most of our network below BNG is MPLS, so no, it's not a star per say.
But as PWs are point-to-point, you are technically correct. Below MPLS
there is some ethernet too and this is all strictly
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Sadiq Saif wrote:
> On 12/24/2014 20:52, Sadiq Saif wrote:
> >
> > Here is the IPv6 version:
> > mtr xmas.asininetech.org
> >
> > Thanks to all the people who helped with the bit of python debugging.
> > :)
> >
>
> For those using traceroute6, try with the -I flag
On 12/28/2014 15:20, Matthew Petach wrote:
>
> What is this supposed -l flag? Linux traceroute6
> doesn't seem to have a -l flag:
>
It seems your version of traceroute6 is too old for the -I option.
It is present in the version in Debian Wheezy.
traceroute6 -V
Modern traceroute for Linux, ve
Picking back up where this left off last year, because I apparently only
work on TACACS during the holidays :)
On 12/30/2013 7:28 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
Even 5 seconds extra for each command may hinder operators, to the extent
it would be intolerable; shell commands should run almost
instan
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Robert Drake wrote:
> Picking back up where this left off last year, because I apparently only
> work on TACACS during the holidays :)
avoiding relatives? :)
>
>
> On 12/30/2013 7:28 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>>
>> Even 5 seconds extra for each command may hinder ope
Seems that your devices are set one year ahead.
That is all
Twitter being twitter, there is no shortage of reports of this.
http://www.neowin.net/news/twitter-bug-makes-tweets-look-old-wont-let-some-users-sign-in
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Chaim Rieger
wrote:
> Seems that your devices are set one year ahead.
>
> That is all
>
Hello,
I recently swapped out a home router for a SRX at home. Any charter techs able
to take a look at the following? It looks like I am seeing some arp broadcast
leaks towards my home router.
Here is a small excerpt I am seeing.
06:04:04.760869 In 00:21:a0:fb:53:d9 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethe
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Robert Drake wrote:
[snip]
> Juniper, at least, does the authorization cache on the device trick...
That seems nice...
> and I wonder what percentage of 'users' a vendor has actually USE tac+
> (or even
> Rfc6613: TLS or IPsec transport is shown as mandatory for RADIUS over TCP.
sweet. can you ref conforming implementations?
randy
12 matches
Mail list logo
