Re: Issue to reach AS3269 through AS6762

On 17/12/2014 15:14, Alessandro Ratti wrote: > Hi guys, > is there anyone from Telecom Italia that should contact me offlist? There is an open thread on ITNOG if you care to join n. Some seem to think it is a byproduct of TI de-peering policy. My 2 [euro] cents, Davide Davini

CRISP Draft Proposal Now Available (IANA Stewardship Transition)

FYI - The IANA administers the unallocated portions of the various Internet number resource pools, and there is a proposal to transition stewardship for the IANA from the USG to the global Internet community. There is a request for proposals on how to best accomplish this transition, and the RIRs

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net For hi

BGP Flowspec Survey

Hey Everyone, I am looking to get feedback from the community on BGP Flowspec for an upcoming presentation... https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/RZYQ23S Feel free to forward this to any contacts you may have that are not on the NANOG list. Obviously, the mo

The Cidr Report

This report has been generated at Fri Dec 19 21:14:21 2014 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date

BGP Update Report

BGP Update Report Interval: 11-Dec-14 -to- 18-Dec-14 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS23752 286594 6.4%3048.9 -- NPTELECOM-NP-AS Nepal Telecommunications Corporation, Intern

Ars breaks Misfortune Cookie vulnerability news to public

While the flaw is 12 years old and the fix 9, the article suggests that firmware for consumer routers may yet be being built with the vulnerable webserver code baked in. If you are responsible for lots of eyeballs you might want to look at this. http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/12/12-million-

Re: Ars breaks Misfortune Cookie vulnerability news to public

Glad I'm using a freebsd based routing solution. On Dec 19, 2014 5:54 PM, "Jay Ashworth" wrote: > While the flaw is 12 years old and the fix 9, the article suggests that > firmware for consumer routers may yet be being built with the vulnerable > webserver code baked in. > > If you are responsibl

Re: Ars breaks Misfortune Cookie vulnerability news to public

Here’s the thing I don’t get… You have X provider supplying routers with vulnerable firmware that have remote support (TR-069) enabled. Why would Check Point not at least name and shame, instead of trying to market their security? I know the hack is old, but grandma isn’t probably up to date o

Re: Ars breaks Misfortune Cookie vulnerability news to public

19:25 <@andrewTO> http://mis.fortunecook.ie/misfortune-cookie-suspected-vulnerable.pdf has a list of potentially vulnerable devices 19:25 <@math> andrewTO@opensrs++ /kc -- Ken Chase - k...@heavycomputing.ca skype:kenchase23 +1 416 897 6284 Toronto Canada Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colo

Re: Ars breaks Misfortune Cookie vulnerability news to public

* jav...@advancedmachines.us (Javier J) [Sat 20 Dec 2014, 00:50 CET]: Glad I'm using a freebsd based routing solution. Time to update that one too: https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-353-01 -- Niels.

RE: Ars breaks Misfortune Cookie vulnerability news to public

On what basis do you assume that there is TR-069 support in these routers? And even if there is, that the service provider manages them via TR-069? Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Tykwinski Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 6:47 PM T

Re: Ars breaks Misfortune Cookie vulnerability news to public

Haha, yeah I spoke too soon. Happy Holidays. Also has anyone looked at the list of devices / vendors that are using that software? https://www.allegrosoft.com/about-allegro-software#tabs-896-0-4 Did the vendors know their vendor was giving them buggy software? What is the test for this vuln?

Re: OT - Verizon/ATT Cell/4G Signal Booster/Repeater

Add T-mobile LTE and to that list. I need one. On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Alex Rubenstein wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Alex Rubenstein > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I just with Wifi calling was ubiquitous. > > > > > > isn't it in every android phone since ~1yr ago? > > P