Can't help with faster adapters, but I believe there are some underlying
architectural issues here as to why the speeds are hard to achieve, and
why some people can and others maybe can't achieve them.
For Carrier Ethernet, I believe most of these are covered in RFC2444 and
the related RFC6815.
For RFC2444, please read RFC2544, and forgive the spam.
*Roy Hirst* | 425-556-5773 | 425-324-0941 cell
XKL LLC | 12020 113th Ave NE, Suite 100 | Kirkland, WA 98034 | USA
On 12/8/2014 8:29 AM, Roy Hirst wrote:
Can't help with faster adapters, but I believe there are some
underlying architectural
We signed our ROAs but we wont be validating anything from the ARIN region.
I believe you will find this to be the norm. The tool provided by RIPE also
ignores ARIN by default.
Someone will probably tell me that I am being arrogant again, but basically
you are asking me to help protect your route
Hi,
I'm looking for an OTDR.
- single and multi mode fibers
- good resolution as the the primary area of operation would be in the
data center
- a low learning curve and simple user interface
What OTDRs / manufactures can you recommend?
Thanks
Karsten
>
>
> One could easily presume the ARIN region RPKI deployment statistics are
> lower as a result of the RPA situation (and no doubt that it part of the
> issue), but as noted earlier, it's unlikely to be the full story since
> we also have a region (APNIC) where RPKI deployment also rather low tha
If you can afford it, Fluke makes very nice products. The versiv platform has
some impressive capabilities and is very easy to use.
I have no stake in or relationship to Fluke, just like their stuff.
Owen
> On Dec 8, 2014, at 10:06 , Karsten Elfenbein
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for an
On Dec 8, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Rubens Kuhl
mailto:rube...@gmail.com>> wrote:
One could easily presume the ARIN region RPKI deployment statistics are
lower as a result of the RPA situation (and no doubt that it part of the
issue), but as noted earlier, it's unlikely to be the full story since
we als
Does anyone on list currently use Peakflow SP from Arbor with TMS, and is it
truly a carrier grade DDoS detection and mitigation platform? Anyone have any
experience with Plixir?
Tony McKay
Dir. Of Network Operations
Office: 870.336.3449
Mobile: 870.243.0058
-The boundary to your comfort zone
Hi,
We’re currently running the Arbor Peakflow SP with the TMS and it works very
well for us.
Best Regards,
Ammar Zuberi
FastReturn, Inc
Direct Line: +971 50 394 7299
Email: am...@fastreturn.net
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use
Not found as much as I'd like.
I can see an architecture, can see the database and where it lives, but
I can't see a data model that works.
if the problem is to track "dumb" infrastructure metadata, like
port::cableID::cabletray, then I can't get an event (e.g. SNMP) to
report a status change,
On 12/08/2014 11:53 AM, Tony McKay wrote:
Does anyone on list currently use Peakflow SP from Arbor with TMS, and is it
truly a carrier grade DDoS detection and mitigation platform? Anyone have any
experience with Plixir?
Peakflow SP with the TMS works quite well. Can be very fast once a
thre
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 01:21:16PM +, Theo Voss wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we, a Berlin / Germany based carrier, are looking for a smart documentation
> (shelfs, connections, fibers) and visualization tool for our ADVA-based
> DWDM-enviroment. Do you have any suggestions or hints for me? We’re t
In message
, Baldur Norddahl writes:
> We signed our ROAs but we wont be validating anything from the ARIN region.
> I believe you will find this to be the norm. The tool provided by RIPE also
> ignores ARIN by default.
>
> Someone will probably tell me that I am being arrogant again, but basica
I care mostly about routes to destinations close to me. If someone
steals a route from someone on other side of the world everyone will
rightly assume it is the other guys having trouble. Plus we simply do not
have much traffic there. On the other hand it adds up for the target if
many ISPs
We also evaluating another appliance to put in place of Arbor, their
"support" outside USA its a joke.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Ammar Zuberi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're currently running the Arbor Peakflow SP with the TMS and it works
> very well for us.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ammar Zuberi
> Fa
Hello NANOG,
I’m a researcher and I was trying to understand the data I collected from
some BGP Looking Glasses. Basically, I was hoping to see if BGP records can
tell me where my university’s provider (AS3701) is peering with its
providers. I issued two BGP queries to Level3’s LGs, one in Seattle
Thanks Joel for your detailed explanation. It was very informative. I have
been using routeviews for sometime, but given that I could get this amount
of information from other sources, I decided to give this a try.
On another note, do you think there is any value in checking the next hop
IP? I hav
17 matches
Mail list logo
