-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 5, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Andreas Larsen wrote:
There is one setup where you would need default route from your provider.
If you have no IBGP between two sites and your prefix is a large /16 on side
and maybe a /18 from that /16 on another site.
We receive full routes and a default so we can perform traffic engineering
within our network. We have links to multiple carriers, via multiple routers.
We inject a default route into OSPF from distinct segments of our network,
based on receiving the default route on that segment via eBGP. If th
On 11/03/2014 12:47 PM, chip wrote:
Exabgp should be able to help you out here. Great for doing fun things
with BGP.
https://github.com/Exa-Networks/exabgp
You find a new tool every day. Thanks for the heads up on that
particular swiss army knife. Looks like it would make this pretty
stra
I have two different customers where I am unable to monitor their networks
due to GRE MTU issues. This is monitoring cable modems so I can't change
the MTU of the end device. The problem I am having is that the modems are
producing frames that appear to be larger than some kind of MTU limit in
th
> On Nov 4, 2014, at 10:49 PM, Andreas Larsen wrote:
>
> There is one setup where you would need default route from your provider.
That may be true, but this isn’t it…
> If you have no IBGP between two sites and your prefix is a large /16 on side
> and maybe a /18 from that /16 on another si
I think the simple solution here is to query for fewer OIDs to get the
packet size (in both directions) down below the MTU. It'll take more
requests and thus longer, but if that's what solves the problem... well,
that's what solves the problem.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Brian Christopher Raa
This would be a good approach. In SNMP the request initiator (the one
sending the SNMP 'Get' or 'GetNext' or 'GetBulk' ) can anticipate the size
of the outgoing request will be small(er) by asking for fewer variables at
a time. (Each variable is a 'varbind' and each is specified in the
outgoing r
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Berry Mobley wrote:
> I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed
> also add default routes pointing to your providers
> from whom you are receiving full feeds.
>
> If so, why? If not, why not?
Back when I worked for the DNC we ran into a problem with the TCA
if there is a commercial contact from hawaiian telcom lurking here, can you
please ping me offlist?
thanks,
chris
I already posted about this rogue AS days ago, but nothing has really
changed much, since then, with respect to its hijacking of IP space.
Well, at least Brian Krebs was kind anough to write about it:
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/11/still-spamming-after-all-these-years/
(Please note that
From our view of the table, it looks like it would be up to either 22
(not likely to happen) or GTT. They've lined the IIRs to pass 201640
through 22 via AS-HereHost.
Anyone from GTT able to comment?
--
Hugo
-Original Message-
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:59:17 -0800
From: "Rona
This course has 25 hours of video, I haven't started it yet but I've
watched many of Laz's videos on Youtube, and he explains stuff very well.
It is $399 though.
They could share the Udemy account, and watch them in their free time.
*I'm not affiliated with Udemy*
https://www.udemy.com/the-compl
I'm interested in talking with someone who has experience shipping hardware
that has been pulled from a working environment. The assumption is that it
would not use a normal carriers such as UPS of Fedex, but via private freight.
Assuming that 20 x 1U switches and a handful of 10U chassis's
Long time I had the same opinion, however, if someone operates a network
with multiple upstream providers the operator should be able to afford a
proper out of band console access which solves this issue completely.
I would only accept a default route on Uplinks where I am only receiving
a par
Old days... :)
http://www.snotr.com/video/14338/In_Honor_Of_The_Internet_Turning_45_Today__Here_Is_Its_First_Router
My suggestion would be to leave the packing & shipping to professionals
Take it to you local UPS store or similar, they can pack it and ship it
( 1u switches, no big deal, but the 10u chassis, most likely best if they are
palatalized)
Doing it any other way would be greatly dependent on
If you are planning to scrap it after retiring it from production, talk to
nsrc @ uoregon, they'll pick it up and ship it to developing countries that
could use it.
On Nov 6, 2014 4:45 AM, "Jason" <8...@tacorp.us> wrote:
>
> I'm interested in talking with someone who has experience shipping
> har
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Jason <8...@tacorp.us> wrote:
.
> If so, please contact me offline if you are willing to share your experience.
If you no longer have the original packing boxes (most manufactures
have a part number for their boxes, you can order and ship them to the DC,
but the
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> (rather than the router that had a fork lift hole in the side of the box
(only
> bent the sheet metal, fortunately), or the entire rack that now had a 15
> degree tilt, and for which the inserted disk drives no longer really fit
into
> the m
On November 6, 2014 at 01:57 israel.l...@lugosys.com (Israel G. Lugo) wrote:
>
> Old days... :)
>
> http://www.snotr.com/video/14338/In_Honor_Of_The_Internet_Turning_45_Today__Here_Is_Its_First_Router
You'll probably love this:
A Conversation with Steve Crocker (Chairman, ICANN, author R
On November 6, 2014 at 01:57 israel.l...@lugosys.com (Israel G. Lugo) wrote:
>
> Old days... :)
>
>
http://www.snotr.com/video/14338/In_Honor_Of_The_Internet_Turning_45_Today__Here_Is_Its_First_Router
Except, it's the ARPANET that's 45 years old, and the video of is an
IMP. :-)
M
21 matches
Mail list logo
