astraceroute on MAC

2014-10-10 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Was wondering if anyone got the astraceroute tool working on MAC? http://www.shrubbery.net/astraceroute/ Tried compiling as well as via Mac ports but no success. Does anyone knows any other alternate similar tool? Thanks. -- Anurag Bhatia anuragbhatia.com Linkedin

Re: GApps admin = rogered

2014-10-10 Thread Mike A
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 08:46:05PM -0500, Larry Sheldon wrote: > On 10/9/2014 18:07, Blair Trosper wrote: > >Just a heads up to our friends at Google Apps. > > > >Despite the status page saying all is peachy: > >http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=en&v=status > > > >...the administration page for a

Re: astraceroute on MAC

2014-10-10 Thread Niels Bakker
* m...@anuragbhatia.com (Anurag Bhatia) [Fri 10 Oct 2014, 14:59 CEST]: Was wondering if anyone got the astraceroute tool working on MAC? [..] Does anyone knows any other alternate similar tool? Why bother when the supplied traceroute supports -a already? -- Niels. --

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

2014-10-10 Thread Naslund, Steve
You have to do both preferrably. You kill the wired port to get them off your LAN, but if they are also on one of your SSIDs or run an unsecured one the AP can bug light your clients. Given that there is an unauthorized intrusion on the wired side, I don't want him talking to my clients at all

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

2014-10-10 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:03:48 -, "Naslund, Steve" said: > the AP can bug light your clients. Only if your clients are configured to allow it. pgpF_JHgfuTWH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Rich Kulawiec
FYI, I migrated to Mailman 2.1.18-1 shortly after Yahoo decided to break every mailing list on the Internet for no good reason. (It certainly has done nothing to mitigate the ongoing flow of spam, phishing and other abuse coming from Yahoo, which continues pretty much as it has for many years.) I

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out

2014-10-10 Thread Owen DeLong
On Oct 9, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > On 9 October 2014 23:18, Roland Dobbins wrote: > >> >> On Oct 10, 2014, at 4:13 AM, Baldur Norddahl >> wrote: >> >>> My colleges wanted to completely drop using public IP addressing in the >> infrastructure. >> >> Your colleagues are wro

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out

2014-10-10 Thread Roland Dobbins
On Oct 10, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > I’m sorry, but this argument utterly fails under any form of analysis. I think he's talking about IPv4 - and saying that since he apparently doesn't have the budget for enough IPv4 subnets to address his point-to-point links, he's inclined to

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Randy Bush
> a better approach would be to recommend that mailing list participants > who want to actually participate should utilize a mail service > appropriate for the purpose. support

Re: astraceroute on MAC

2014-10-10 Thread Tim Schuh
Are you trying to accomplish something the stock traceroute on OS X can't currently do? The traceroute that came on my Mac (10.9.5 as of last update) can look up the ASN right out of the box. >$ traceroute Version 1.4a12+Darwin Usage: traceroute [-adDeFInrSvx] [-A as_server] [-f first_ttl] [-g ga

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >> a better approach would be to recommend that mailing list participants >> who want to actually participate should utilize a mail service >> appropriate for the purpose. > > support to be fair, this means EITHER one which does not DMARC mark m

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

2014-10-10 Thread Naslund, Steve
Now that BYOD is so popular, you don't control all of your client configurations so you better find a way to try to secure them as much as possible from the network side. Defense in depth is what it is. It a lot easy to manage one wireless IDP/IDS than a thousand clients that get replaced and

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Randy Bush
>>> a better approach would be to recommend that mailing list participants >>> who want to actually participate should utilize a mail service >>> appropriate for the purpose. >> >> support > > to be fair, this means EITHER one which does not DMARC mark messages > OR one which disrespects DMARC. Ri

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Steve Atkins
On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> a better approach would be to recommend that mailing list participants >>> who want to actually participate should utilize a mail service >>> appropriate for the purpose. >> >> supp

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Michael Thomas
On 10/10/2014 08:10 AM, Randy Bush wrote: a better approach would be to recommend that mailing list participants who want to actually participate should utilize a mail service appropriate for the purpose. support to be fair, this means EITHER one which does not DMARC mark messages OR one which

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Call it triage. When a minuscule amount of mailing list traffic is weighed against huge volumes of forged spam and phish... On 10-Oct-2014 9:40 pm, "Michael Thomas" wrote: > On 10/10/2014 08:10 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > >> a better approach would be to recommend that mailing list participants >>>

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Royce Williams
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Steve Atkins wrote: > If your domain publishes p=reject it should not have any users > that participate in mailing lists. Like many, I was pretty unhappy (and busy) with the unilateral changes made by Yahoo and AOL. But this understandable stance may change. Neit

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Royce Williams wrote: > What other theory about their motivation makes sense? Most of the DMARC backers offer one or more services that compete with traditional mailinglists. -Jim P.

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Steve Atkins
On Oct 10, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Royce Williams wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Steve Atkins wrote: >> If your domain publishes p=reject it should not have any users >> that participate in mailing lists. > > Like many, I was pretty unhappy (and busy) with the unilateral changes > made by

peer1 contact?

2014-10-10 Thread goemon
Can someone from peer1.net contact me? You are filtering your ab...@peer1.net mailbox. -Dan

Re: peer1 contact?

2014-10-10 Thread Alistair Mackenzie
Just a heads up, Gmail gave me a warning about this email too so that may be your problem. On 10 October 2014 18:15, wrote: > Can someone from peer1.net contact me? > > You are filtering your ab...@peer1.net mailbox. > > -Dan >

Re: peer1 contact?

2014-10-10 Thread Tom Hill
On 10/10/14 19:01, Alistair Mackenzie wrote: > Gmail gave me a warning about this email too so that may be your problem. Yeah, my provider classified it as spam too (which I think is a fairly basic SpamAssassin installation). -- Tom

Weekly Routing Table Report

2014-10-10 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG, TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread John Levine
>But other than providing more warning, what would have been a better >way to start eliminating forged senders? Everything I've read >indicates that both Yahoo and AOL did this with eyes wide open. A good move would have been to improve their security so that AOL and Yahoo didn't have massive the

Re: peer1 contact?

2014-10-10 Thread goemon
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Tom Hill wrote: On 10/10/14 19:01, Alistair Mackenzie wrote: Gmail gave me a warning about this email too so that may be your problem. Yeah, my provider classified it as spam too (which I think is a fairly basic SpamAssassin installation). nope. peer1 is rejecting emails

Re: peer1 contact?

2014-10-10 Thread Stephen Satchell
What happens when you send plain-text mail, instead of HTML mail? On 10/10/2014 11:27 AM, goe...@anime.net wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Tom Hill wrote: >> On 10/10/14 19:01, Alistair Mackenzie wrote: >>> Gmail gave me a warning about this email too so that may be your >>> problem. >> Yeah, my pro

Re: astraceroute on MAC

2014-10-10 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Dear Tim and Niels Surely default traceroute in MAC is there but the -a option isn't good. It picks data from RADB and not from actually visible prefix in global routing table. Hence wrongly registered RADB objects / old objects and more give weird output. E.g take example of trace to one of AS1

The Cidr Report

2014-10-10 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri Oct 10 21:14:14 2014 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date

BGP Update Report

2014-10-10 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report Interval: 02-Oct-14 -to- 09-Oct-14 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS7552 1489150 21.8%1181.9 -- VIETEL-AS-AP Viettel Corporation,VN 2 - AS23752 1

Re: Bounce action notifications - NANOG mailing list changes yahoo.com users

2014-10-10 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:48:26PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Call it triage. When a minuscule amount of mailing list traffic is weighed > against huge volumes of forged spam and phish... Triage as an abuse mitigation tactic is fine. But where that triage needs to be applied, and whe

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address

2014-10-10 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
A follow up question on this topic.. For Router Loopback Address what is wisdom in allocating a /64 vs /128 ? (the BCOP document suggests this, but does not offer any explanation or merits of one over the other). Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address

2014-10-10 Thread Roland Dobbins
On Oct 11, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > For Router Loopback Address what is wisdom in allocating a /64 vs /128 ? In the BCOP, this is noted so that those who suboptimally address their p-t-p links with /64s can be consistently suboptimal by doing the same with their loopback

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address

2014-10-10 Thread Måns Nilsson
Subject: Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address Date: Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 05:41:43AM + Quoting Faisal Imtiaz (fai...@snappytelecom.net): > A follow up question on this topic.. > > For Router Loopback Address what is wisdom in allocating a /64 vs /128 ?

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address

2014-10-10 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
> In the BCOP, this is noted so that those who suboptimally address their p-t-p > links with /64s can be consistently suboptimal by doing the same with their > loopbacks, I am trying to understand what is sub-optimal about doing so...Waste of Ipv6 space ? or some other technical reason ? (is a /

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address

2014-10-10 Thread Roland Dobbins
On Oct 11, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > I am trying to understand what is sub-optimal about doing so...Waste of Ipv6 > space ? or some other technical reason ? It's wasteful of address space, but more importantly, it turns your router into a sinkole. > (is a /64 address are a 'si