On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:01:41PM -0400, ITechGeek wrote:
> As a replacement, you can use Amazon SES and verify single email addresses
> if you don't have access over the whole domain.
Not if you want people to accept your mail. Thanks to Amazon's policy
of (a) allowing unlimited spam and (b) ig
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 9/5/2014 7:35 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> > "Interface" sure.
> >
> > But the dangers of replacing actual /addresses/ with things which
> > are not is sufficiently well under
>
> There would be a root, or multiple roots, which would respond to
> requests to locate who should be asked about a domain, for example if
> you want to know the ip address for world.std.com the conversation
> goes roughly:
>
>(To Root Server): Where is the COM server?
>(From Root S
You would also need to not care about sending email to IPv6 domains.
Owen
On Sep 5, 2014, at 16:01 , ITechGeek wrote:
> As a replacement, you can use Amazon SES and verify single email addresses
> if you don't have access over the whole domain.
>
> -
Hello everyone!
I have a Juniper SRX firewall and in recent times I did had issues because
one or other user doing an attack outside. Usually it is compromised client
machines which create a lot of firewall sessions in outside direction.
I was thinking of two specific things as fix for this:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Sander Steffann wrote:
> Well, you don't need addresses for clients, just for content... From
> the architecture page at http://named-data.net/project/archoverview/:
>
> "Note that neither Interest nor Data packets carry any host or
> interface addresses (such as IP addresse
Barry Shein wrote:
> The idea is very simple, each site would be responsible for their own
> domain and to respond to simple remote requests for name to ip address
> mappings or back again.
Wrong. DNS is not that simple.
Domains and sites have, in general, independent topology
that sites can not
7 matches
Mail list logo
