Re: Next steps in extortion case - ideas?

Not sure if anyone else has mentioned this but one reason to get law enforcement involved, cynicism aside, is a concern for personal, particularly physical, retribution. At one time I spent a bit too much time refuting holocaust deniers, it got rather one-on-one. They came in various flavors but

Looking for a maxcdn contact.

Does anyone have a contact for maxcdn's noc/routing/peering group? We're seeing routes that are note coming over certain providers and from some locations we're seeing private asn's in the as path. Thanks, Bryan Socha Network Engineer DigitalOcean

Re: MACsec SFP

> > Perhaps such lag could be avoided in future if we'd specify some 'host to SFP' > high level protocol, perhaps in much the same way as DHCP 'option' handling? The SFF Committee specifies GBIC registers. They’d be the appropriate group to add registers for features such as MACsec, Ethernet OAM

Cheap LSN/CGN/NAT444 Solution

Hi all, I am sure this is something that a reasonable number of people would have done on this list. I am after a LSN/CGN/NAT444 solution to put about 1000 Residential profile NBN speeds (fastest 100/40) services behind. I am looking at a Cisco ASR1001/2, pfSense and am willing to consider other

Re: MACsec SFP

On (2014-06-30 13:28 +0930), Glen Turner wrote: > After the SFF Committee specifies the registers the operating system vendors > or vendors of devices would then add commands to support to toggle the I2C > needed to program those registers with MACsec keys, etc. This is what I tried to tackle,

Re: Cheap LSN/CGN/NAT444 Solution

On 6/30/2014 1:59 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote: Hi all, I am sure this is something that a reasonable number of people would have done on this list. I am after a LSN/CGN/NAT444 solution to put about 1000 Residential profile NBN speeds (fastest 100/40) services behind. I am looking at a Cisco ASR1