Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > On 08/01/2014 18:14, Christopher Morrow wrote: > >> question... there's people that have done this before even :) > > https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog29/presentations/gill.

Re: bcp38.info wiki signup problem

Well, Out of 25 accounts, 22 where for spamming. Even with captcha, etc. Since then I put a mention to contact modera...@bcp38.info for account creation. You'll see it if you are going through the [Log in] link http://www.bcp38.info/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&returnto=Ma

About ddos-respo...@nfoservers.com

Well, Those poor guys are under perma DNS Amplifcation DDoS for what seems to be 2 weeks now. About 7 days ago they started sending us emails for what is less than 2MB worth of data (~500 packets) which is about how long it takes for filters to take effect. But after 1 week of co

Re: About ddos-respo...@nfoservers.com

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Alain Hebert wrote: > Well, > > Those poor guys are under perma DNS Amplifcation DDoS for what seems > to be 2 weeks now. > they seem to be hosted at internap, you'd think they could just ask internap to fix this for them instead, eh?

Re: About ddos-respo...@nfoservers.com

On Jan 24, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Alain Hebert wrote: > >Is there a [Spoofing Tracking Squad] out there? >( We're on GT-T/nLayer/Tinet ) You haven’t been able to get GTT/nLayer/TINet to track the traffic back? Details are welcome, either here or in private. There are plenty of people who

Re: About ddos-respo...@nfoservers.com

On Jan 24, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: > You haven’t been able to get GTT/nLayer/TINet to track the traffic back? > > Details are welcome, either here or in private. There are plenty of people > who will chase and fix this stuff when they’re aware of it. When OpenResolver Project was

Re: About ddos-respo...@nfoservers.com

On 24 January 2014 16:23, Chris Boyd wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: > >> You haven’t been able to get GTT/nLayer/TINet to track the traffic back? >> >> Details are welcome, either here or in private. There are plenty of people >> who will chase and fix this stuff when

L2TPv3 - and layer 2 PDU's

To all, Has anyone successfully tunneled L2 PDU's (STP, CDP, LLDP) over a L2TPv3 pseudowire tunnel, i.e. should I be able to see CDP neighbors across the tunnel? For some reason if I encapsulated dot1q on a router sub-interface and try and pass traffic across the trunk the downstream switch por

Re: L2TPv3 - and layer 2 PDU's

Yes, 10 years ago on 10720, CDP and LACP worked like a charm Regards, Jeff > On Jan 24, 2014, at 7:55 AM, "Philip Lavine" wrote: > > To all, > > Has anyone successfully tunneled L2 PDU's (STP, CDP, LLDP) over a L2TPv3 > pseudowire tunnel, i.e. should I be able to see CDP neighbors across the

Time Warner RoadRunner Residental NOC Contact?

Sorry for the noise, but we are looking for somebody that can help us track down a single IP address that is seemingly blackholed by TW/RR in a core somewhere in Atlanta. We have verified that the IP doesn't have any abuse history and isn't blackholed from our end. Just started this morning. An

AOL Email Blocking

A while back I enlisted help for setting up a small email list server. It is now complete but only AOL is blocking my outbound email. Using their tools they did not report my IP as having a bad reputation. I applied for white listing my single IP and provided ALL the necessary feedback and whi

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG, TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap

Re: AOL Email Blocking

On Jan 24, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Robert Webb wrote: > A while back I enlisted help for setting up a small email list server. It is > now complete but only AOL is blocking my outbound email. > > Using their tools they did not report my IP as having a bad reputation. I > applied for white listing

Re: AOL Email Blocking

On 01/24/2014 01:14 PM, Robert Webb wrote: A while back I enlisted help for setting up a small email list server. It is now complete but only AOL is blocking my outbound email. Using their tools they did not report my IP as having a bad reputation. I applied for white listing my single IP and

Re: AOL Email Blocking

On 1/24/2014 2:53 PM, Robert Webb wrote: > A while back I enlisted help for setting up a small email list server. > It is now complete but only AOL is blocking my outbound email. Send me your IP (off list if desired) and I'll evaluate it and possibly provide some feedback that may be helpful! -

Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

Given how much traffic these days is CDN and streaming, is that number really supportable? http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer Th

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

On Jan 24, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > Given how much traffic these days is CDN and streaming, is that number > really supportable? > > http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet > http://www.seattleix.net/agg.htm http://www.torix.ca/stats.php Obv

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

On 01/24/2014 09:08 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > Given how much traffic these days is CDN and streaming, is that number > really supportable? > > http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet In the interview they are saying that if Google is down, lots of people don't h

RE: OSPF Costs Formula that include delay.

I understand OSPF default calculation for cost doesn't include delay. I am looking for a formula that I can use to manually set the OSPF costs that factors in delay. When using OSPF's default costs, the shortest path is not always the optimal path. Example New York to Los Angeles. Assuming a

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

- Original Message - > From: "Jay Ashworth" > http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet It's just been pointed out to me that, even though Marketplace just posted the link to that piece, the dateline is from August. My apologies for not noticing. Cheer

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > In the interview they are saying that if Google is down, lots of people > don't have DNS anymore. So that accounts for an even larger drop than > just "no Youtube". Hmm - why would people use those resolvers, besides > being lazy in config

Re: OSPF Costs Formula that include delay.

Some networks I have worked with took the average latency of each link and assigned that (with some constant multiple) as the interface cost. Of course this all fails miserably if you are using anything like MPLS underneath your OSPF. Owen On Jan 24, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Erik Sundberg wrote: >

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

- Original Message - > From: "Stefan Neufeind" > On 01/24/2014 09:08 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > Given how much traffic these days is CDN and streaming, is that > > number really supportable? > > > > http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet > > In the in

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

On 1/24/2014 12:31 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: - Original Message - From: "Jay Ashworth" http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet It's just been pointed out to me that, even though Marketplace just posted the link to that piece, the dateline is from Aug

RE: OSPF Costs Formula that include delay.

> > Some networks I have worked with took the average latency of each link and > assigned that (with some constant multiple) as the interface cost. > > Of course this all fails miserably if you are using anything like MPLS > underneath your OSPF. > But then when using MPLS underneath, then MPLS

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:22:58 +0100, Stefan Neufeind said: > just "no Youtube". Hmm - why would people use those resolvers, besides > being lazy in configuring a proper resolver-address. A lot of people make value judgements on the relative likelyhood of finding evil in DNS packets coming from 8.8

Re: About ddos-respo...@nfoservers.com

Hi, Well the abusers started to use burst and then switching targeted IP. Last time I opened a ticket with GT-T/nLayer for a ~120Mbps NTP DDoS Amplification "attempt" toward 2 of my IP's. . after 2h, I called them directly to be told they lost my original request; .

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

On 14-01-24 03:40 PM, Shrdlu wrote: > On 1/24/2014 12:31 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: >> - Original Message - >>> From: "Jay Ashworth" >> >>> http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet >>> >> >> It's just been pointed out to me that, even though Marketplace just

Re: OSPF Costs Formula that include delay.

Eric, Issues: 1.OSPF (SPF) can only produce a SPT based on cost (metric). Anything else would require CSPF rather than SPF. 2. Delay is not distributed as part of an IGP update Typical constrains distributed are: bandwidth, color, some others In IETF we are working to also be able to distribut

Opensource tools for inventory and troubleticketing

Hello everyone, I work for a small service provider starting to offer MPLS services between Europe and several african countries. At present time we own a small Cisco network, but we are starting to need a better inventory of services and network resources and better troubleticketing procedures. W

Re: AOL Email Blocking

Robert, Please email me the details. Also please provide the ticket number for investigation. Thanks. Vish Subramanian AOL Mail Postmaster Operations -Original Message- From: Robert Webb To: nanog Sent: Fri, Jan 24, 2014 1:17 pm Subject: AOL Email Blocking A while back I e

Re: OSPF Costs Formula that include delay.

On Jan 24, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Raymond Burkholder wrote: >> >> Some networks I have worked with took the average latency of each link and >> assigned that (with some constant multiple) as the interface cost. >> >> Of course this all fails miserably if you are using anything like MPLS >> underne

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

- Original Message - > From: "Shrdlu" > You sure? I think that there is an actual outage, unrelated to the > article you'd posted. > > http://techcrunch.com/2014/01/24/gmail-glitch-is-causing-thousands-of-emails-to-be-sent-to-one-mans-hotmail-account/ There was an outage today, and that

Re: Opensource tools for inventory and troubleticketing

- Original Message - > From: "Octavio Alfageme" > we are starting to need a better inventory of services and network > resources and better troubleticketing procedures. We can not afford acquiring > complicated and expensive tools at present time.I would be grateful if > you could recomm

Re: About ddos-respo...@nfoservers.com

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Alain Hebert wrote: > Hi, > > Well the abusers started to use burst and then switching targeted IP. > > Last time I opened a ticket with GT-T/nLayer for a ~120Mbps NTP DDoS > Amplification "attempt" toward 2 of my IP's. > > . after 2h, I called

The Cidr Report

This report has been generated at Fri Jan 24 21:13:35 2014 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date

BGP Update Report

BGP Update Report Interval: 16-Jan-14 -to- 23-Jan-14 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS14420 44341 2.2% 183.2 -- CORPORACION NACIONAL DE TELECOMUNICACIONES - CNT EP 2 - AS8

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

On 01/24/2014 09:46 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:22:58 +0100, Stefan Neufeind said: > >> just "no Youtube". Hmm - why would people use those resolvers, besides >> being lazy in configuring a proper resolver-address. > > A lot of people make value judgements on the r

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

- Original Message - > From: "Stefan Neufeind" > If it's just "some" DNS your provider hands out, I agree it's not much > better as well. (But you might possibly assume your provider has less > interst to spy on all your emails, your dns-queries and the like.) You might assume that, I wo

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

There was a lot of discussion about this figure back in August when the relevant outage occurred. >From memory, a large percentage of the traffic drop was from other sites breaking as a result of Google not being available. ie, a site completely unrelated to Google, potentially being served by a C

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > interst to spy on all your emails, your dns-queries and the like.) FUD much? have you read the public-dns ToS and privacy statements? if you haven't you might want to: > What imho

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

- Original Message - > From: "Scott Howard" > A non-trivial percentage of the Internet is in some way or other dependent > on things like Google Analytics/maps/etc, Facebook likes, Twitter recent > tweets, etc, such that if any of those services are not available the site > fails to load,

Re: OSPF Costs Formula that include delay.

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > Eric, > Issues: > 1.OSPF (SPF) can only produce a SPT based on cost (metric). > Anything else would require CSPF rather than SPF. > A CSPF based protocol would be a suitable algorithm for adding hard constraints, instead of preference, such

Re: Opensource tools for inventory and troubleticketing

On 14-01-24 05:22 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > If you can't, RT is pretty nice, though quite a bit more complex. It used > to have an asset tracking snap-on, but I don't know what the status of that > is now that the main package has revved to 4.0. > +1 on RT being awesome, but a little daunting to

Re: Opensource tools for inventory and troubleticketing

On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Octavio Alfageme wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I work for a small service provider starting to offer MPLS services between > Europe and several african countries. At present time we own a small Cisco > network, but we are starting to need a better inventory of servic

Charter routing issues

Hello, Can someone from Charter Communications enlighten us to if you are having any issues or reach out to me directly. We are seeing some interesting traceroutes from St. Louis, Mo to St. Louis Charter customers via Level3, Qwest, or Cogent. Packets are being sent all over resulting in tra

Re: OSPF Costs Formula that include delay.

The auto-cost capability in some vendors devices seems to have left many people ignoring the link metrics within their IGP. From what I recall in the standards - bandwidth is one possible link metric but certainly not the only one. Network designers are free (and I would encourage to) pick whatever

Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?

On Jan 25, 2014, at 6:07 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > I wonder what percentage of large website operators whose site designs have > such external dependencies have had it occur to them to include those > external services in their monitoring systems? This presupposes that they actually have monit