Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Was I the only one who thought that everything about this was great
apart from this comment:
> In reality additional poking leads me to believe AT&T gives you a
rather
> generous /60
Is a /60 what is considered generous these days? I thought a /48 was
considered normal and
On 28 November 2013 13:07, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> Andrew D Kirch wrote:
>
> Was I the only one who thought that everything about this was great
> apart from this comment:
>
>> In reality additional poking leads me to believe AT&T gives you a
> rather
>> generous /60
>
> Is a /60 what is considered ge
In message
, "Constantine A. Murenin" writes:
> On 28 November 2013 13:07, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> > Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> >
> > Was I the only one who thought that everything about this was great
> > apart from this comment:
> >
> >> In reality additional poking leads me to believe AT&T gives you
On 28 November 2013 14:56, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message
>
> , "Constantine A. Murenin" writes:
>> On 28 November 2013 13:07, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>> > Andrew D Kirch wrote:
>> >
>> > Was I the only one who thought that everything about this was great
>> > apart from this comment:
>> >
>> >>
In message
,
"Constantine A. Murenin" writes:
> On 28 November 2013 14:56, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > In message
> >
> > , "Constantine A. Murenin" writes:
> >> On 28 November 2013 13:07, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> >> > Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Was I the only one who thought that everyt
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, Mark Andrews wrote:
You can hand out /48 as easily with 6rd as you can natively.
It's only when the ISP is lazy and encodes the entire IPv4 address
space into 6rd thereby wasting most of the IPv6 address space being
used for 6rd that a /60 appears to be generous.
You're c
We're a service provider, and we have a network full of Cat6509's. We
are finding that we are outgrowing them from the standpoint of their
ability to handle lots of large routing tables. Obviously their
switching capability is still superb but one of them with 20 peers is
starting to groan a bi
Look at Juniper, MX Series.
mehmet
On Nov 28, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Jawaid Desktop wrote:
> We're a service provider, and we have a network full of Cat6509's. We are
> finding that we are outgrowing them from the standpoint of their ability to
> handle lots of large routing tables. Obviously thei
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Jawaid Desktop wrote:
What do people use these days? Our backbone needs in the next 2-3 years
are going to be sub-100Gbps.
Cisco ASR 9000, Juniper MX, Huawei NE40E, Alcatel-Lucent 7750, those kinds
of routers are the ones I hear people using. Some go for the new Sup2T for
On Nov 29, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Jawaid Desktop wrote:
> Our backbone needs in the next 2-3 years are going to be sub-100Gbps.
Make sure you get something that, unlike the pre-Sup2T 6500/7600, has
operationally useful NetFlow, ACLs, and uRPF.
-
Hi Mikael,
> Some go for the new Sup2T for the 6500, but I don't know how much more CPU it
> has compared to your SUP/RSP720, perhaps someone else knows?
The Sup2T I worked on has:
CPU: MPC8572_E, Version: 2.2, (0x80E80022)
CORE: E500, Version: 3.0, (0x80210030)
CPU:1500MHz, CCB:600MHz, DDR:
In message , Mikael
Abrahamsson writes:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > You can hand out /48 as easily with 6rd as you can natively.
> >
> > It's only when the ISP is lazy and encodes the entire IPv4 address
> > space into 6rd thereby wasting most of the IPv6 address space being
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message , Mikael
Abrahamsson writes:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, Mark Andrews wrote:
You can hand out /48 as easily with 6rd as you can natively.
You're contradicting yourself here.
What contradiction?
"As easily". It's easier to either hand out /6
13 matches
Mail list logo
