William Herrin writes:
> IPv4 jumped from 8 bits to 32 bits. Which when you think about it is
> the same ratio as jumping from 32 bits to 128 bits.
Sorry for the late reply, Bill, but you were snoozing when they taught
logarithms in high school weren't you?
Jumping from 8 bits to 32 bits (1:16
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
> William Herrin writes:
>> IPv4 jumped from 8 bits to 32 bits. Which when you think about it is
>> the same ratio as jumping from 32 bits to 128 bits.
>
> Jumping from 8 bits to 32 bits (1:16mm) is the same ratio as would be
> jumping from 32
On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:11 , William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>> William Herrin writes:
>>> IPv4 jumped from 8 bits to 32 bits. Which when you think about it is
>>> the same ratio as jumping from 32 bits to 128 bits.
>>
>> Jumping from 8 bits to 32 bi
William Herrin wrote:
[...]
> And yet we're allocating /19's
If the stats published at
http://www.nro.net/pub/stats/nro/delegated-extended are to be believed
then the only two /19s were allocated in 2005 when the HD-ratio value in
the policy was lower. Looking at all the RIRs together another n
Anyone alive at TWC and/or MTC broadband?
Looks like AS36100 (MTC Broadband) is incorrectly announcing 72.43.125.0/24.
This is causing problems for TWC users who are in 72.43.125.0/24
--
Tim:>
I'd love to be able to turn the microwave and oven on with my phone..
maybe ten years from now lol..
In all seriousness though (and after skimming some of the other
responses), I absolutely understand the ideals and needs amongst
conserving memory on our routers for the sake of the future of bgp a
I was talking to a bunch of people who run ISPs and other networks in
LDCs (yes, including Nigeria) and someone asked about monitoring tools
to watch traffic on his network so he can get advance warning of dodgy
customers and prevent complaints and blacklisting.
These people are plenty smart, but
back in the good o'l days when we would hand out 24 bits for the
number of hosts in a network. It was too many bits then and is
too many bits now a /64 is just overkill.
/bill
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 03:11:39PM -0400, Ryan McIntosh wrote:
> I'd love to be able to turn the microwave an
The original plan was to go from 32 to 64 bits total. The additional 64 bits
were added purely for the sake of EUI-64 based addressing, and really, 64 bits
of network number is way more than enough.
The /64 a are not what justify the larger blocks. That's IPv4 think.
In IPv6, it is far better
--- o...@delong.com wrote:
From: Owen DeLong
we will have plenty of address space to number the internet
for many many years.
--
You can't know the future and what addressing requirements
it'll bring:
"I have to say that in 1981, making those de
I try not to think about sinners too much when planning networks. Subnets are
more interesting.
Maybe many of you like spending time maintaining NAT configurations and
creatively masking as determined by today's end system count on each subnet.
This all, of course, in the interest of maximum ad
On 10/01/2013 02:29 PM, John Levine wrote:
> I was talking to a bunch of people who run ISPs and other networks in
> LDCs (yes, including Nigeria) and someone asked about monitoring tools
> to watch traffic on his network so he can get advance warning of dodgy
> customers and prevent complaints and
Hi,
Having some issues with traffic to Facebook.
Is there anyone here from Facebook lurking on the list? Or does anyone have
a better contact then their help form?
Regards,
Daniel
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Daniel Hood wrote:
Having some issues with traffic to Facebook.
Is there anyone here from Facebook lurking on the list? Or does anyone have
a better contact then their help form?
Try o...@facebook.com
jms
On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:29 AM, John Levine wrote:
> These people are plenty smart, but don't have a lot of money.
Enable NetFlow, and use some open-source NetFlow collection/analysis system
like nfdump/nfsen, etc.
dnstop and the like for DNS can be pretty revealing, as well.
Coworkers of mine introduced me to Observium:
http://www.observium.org/wiki/Main_Page
Cheers,
Ryan
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:29 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
> > These people are plenty smart, but don't have a lot of money.
>
> Enable NetFlow, a
On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Ryan Dooley wrote:
> Coworkers of mine introduced me to Observium:
> http://www.observium.org/wiki/Main_Page
Does it utilize flow telemetry? On the main page, they talk about SNMP, making
it sound a lot like Nagios . . .
---
No all stats are snmp based
> On 02 окт. 2013 г., at 9:07, "Dobbins, Roland" wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Ryan Dooley wrote:
>>
>> Coworkers of mine introduced me to Observium:
>> http://www.observium.org/wiki/Main_Page
>
> Does it utilize flow telemetry? On the main page, they
18 matches
Mail list logo
