Re: IP Fragmentation - Not reliable over the Internet?

2013-08-31 Thread Emile Aben
On 30/08/2013 16:36, Benno Overeinder wrote: > On 08/30/2013 01:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> In a study using the RIPE Atlas probes, we have used a heuristic to >>> figure out where the fragments where dropped. And from the Atlas >>> probes where IP fragments did not arrive, there is a high likeli

Re: IP Fragmentation - Not reliable over the Internet?

2013-08-31 Thread Randy Bush
could you please test with ipv6? thanks! randy

Re: IP Fragmentation - Not reliable over the Internet?

2013-08-31 Thread Randy Bush
>>> i wonder if this is correlated with the high number of probes being >>> behind nats. > > Maybe this provides a bit of insight: > From a test last week from all RIPE Atlas probes to a single "known > good" MTU 1500 host I compared probes where I had both a ping test with > ipv4.len 1020 and ipv

Re: subrate SFP?

2013-08-31 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote: > > From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi] > Considering that Dell and HP at least are shipping brand new hardware with > IPMI/BMC/iLO/whatever management ports that can only speak 100mbit when > every other Ethernet interface in the box at leas

Re: subrate SFP?

2013-08-31 Thread Charles N Wyble
On hp proliant gen8 servers with management and ilo on same port, with the server off the ports show up as 100mbps. Jimmy Hess wrote: >On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote: > >> > From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi] >> Considering that Dell and HP at least are shipping brand n

Re: subrate SFP?

2013-08-31 Thread Joel Jaeggli
WOL uses 100Mb/s, the phy draws less that way. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:13, Charles N Wyble wrote: > On hp proliant gen8 servers with management and ilo on same port, with the > server off the ports show up as 100mbps. > > Jimmy Hess wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:4

couldn't get address for 'w.au': no more ,

2013-08-31 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , Are the roots for .au lost in the haze someplace ? During my attempts to reach http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ I tried a 'dig www.coker.com.au +trace' Did some roots change recently ? Tia, JimL Which yielded ... ; <<>> DiG 9.9.3-P2 <<>> w

Re: subrate SFP?

2013-08-31 Thread Nick B
Ah, I needed *another* reason to murder WOL in it's sleep. Thanks! Nick On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > WOL uses 100Mb/s, the phy draws less that way. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:13, Charles N Wyble > wrote: > > > On hp proliant gen8 servers with

Re: couldn't get address for 'w.au': no more ,

2013-08-31 Thread Rob Szarka
On 8/31/2013 4:05 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: Hello All , Are the roots for .au lost in the haze someplace ? FWIW, I'm seeing records for both w.au and z.au from here: w.au. 172800 IN A 37.209.192.5 ;; Received 38 bytes from 2001:dcd:4::5#53(2001:dcd:4:

Re: subrate SFP?

2013-08-31 Thread Jima
Unless I missed something, iLO is always on when the machine has power; as such, WOL shouldn't be coming into play on reasonably modern HP servers. (That said, the power draw is likely still the reason, although I can't readily confirm Charles' observation on my only rackmount Gen8.) J