OSPF and Forcing a Subnet

2013-07-20 Thread Shahab Vahabzadeh
Dear Friends, I have an OSPF over GRE configuration sending you below in which I have problem. I want to force OSPF to advertise 172.16/16 range without checking anything. And as you see I have an static route for it in routing table but again OSPF do not advertise it, only it advertise when I put

Re: OSPF and Forcing a Subnet

2013-07-20 Thread Jon Lewis
You don't have a route for 172.16/16 in the config below, so ospf will not advertise it. You do have a route for a subnet of 172.16/16, so either use summary-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 or nail up a static route for 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 to null0 and redistribute static subnets, and then o

Re: OSPF and Forcing a Subnet

2013-07-20 Thread Shahab Vahabzadeh
Dear Jon I have a mistake in my last email, there is a static route like this: ip route 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.20.76.12 but again it is redistributing On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Jon Lewis wrote: > You don't have a route for 172.16/16 in the config below, so ospf will not > advertise

Re: OSPF and Forcing a Subnet

2013-07-20 Thread Randy
what you are seeing is the expected behavior. you are asking the router to generate a type 3 summary for a type 1 lsa that doesn't exist for area 10 via the "area 10 range' command" (also, that is why it works when you add a /32 to loopback) 172.16/16 is an external route. If you want to genera

Vendors CLI Usability vs UNIX Shell

2013-07-20 Thread Kasper Adel
Hello, My vendor is giving me speeches on how they are improving their product Serviceability, Usability and Manageability. They told me they are adding a lot of new way of doing things, introducing more Unix-like utilities and over all making CLI smarter by exposing more visibility into system st

AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8

2013-07-20 Thread Yang Yu
It appears AS3549 is announcing 10.0.0.0/8. I noticed it from an AS3549 customer. >From GBLX looking glass, ATL1 traceroute Protocol [ip]: ip Target IP address: 10.0.0.1 Source address: Numeric display [n]: n Timeout in seconds [3]: 1 Probe count [3]: 2 Minimum Time to Live [1]: 1 Maximum Time to

Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8

2013-07-20 Thread Larry Sheldon
On 7/20/2013 11:26 PM, Yang Yu wrote: It appears AS3549 is announcing 10.0.0.0/8. I noticed it from an AS3549 customer. I wonder why people don't drop any update that contains stuff like RFC 1918 space. -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics

Re: OSPF and Forcing a Subnet

2013-07-20 Thread Shahab Vahabzadeh
Dear Randy, Thanks for your help, but 172.16/16 belong to that region and for example 172.17/16 belong to another one and I want to ospf bring me the whole subnet not which I used. And summary-address does not to this for me. Thanks On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Randy wrote: > what you are s

Re: Vendors CLI Usability vs UNIX Shell

2013-07-20 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Kasper Adel wrote: My vendor is giving me speeches on how they are improving their product Serviceability, Usability and Manageability. They told me they are adding a lot of new way of doing things, introducing more Unix-like utilities and over all making CLI smarter by expo

Re: Vendors CLI Usability vs UNIX Shell

2013-07-20 Thread Daniel Rohan
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Justin M. Streiner < strei...@cluebyfour.org> wrote: > One thing to watch out for is whether parity exists between the CLI and > whatever other means the vendor provides for managing their stuff. I can > think of a few cases where this isn't (or wasn't) the case.