False alarm. Sorry for vain hope (if there was any). IPv6 is back in
normal. Seatbelts can be unfasten.
T.
On 6/24/13 2:39 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> there is massive increase in IPv6 adoption (from 1.5% to 1.7%) in the
>> past few days.
> luckily i had my seatbelt fastened
>
> randy
On 6/26/2013 5:11 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
Thanks everyone.
It sounds like (a) customer needs to clarify contract terms with Paetec, and
(b) unless they have an ongoing relationship, the best long-term plan is to
renumber.
I did check reg dates on the blocks, and it is much more recent than the
c
perhaps more verbosely:
"Jeffrey, how can I be of assistance? Or did you already get worked
out via another avenue?"
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> yes?
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Jeff Harper wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> If anyone on the list is from Google an
Are there any SixXS admins who read this list? I seem to have committed a
faux pas with respect to requesting an account, and I'm not getting any
responses to my attempts (to i...@sixxs.net) to clear up the issue.
I appreciate the response, and apologize for this intrusion...
_KMP
Can I piggy back on that inquiry and request a reset of my ISK points
after committing a faux pas with respect to going negative from down v6
tunnels and deleting. Now to create a new tunnel I need positive ISK
points and I'm stilling at -10 with no way to boost my numbers. :(
Reset Points: A
Subject: Re: SixXS Contact Date: Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:47:51AM -0400 Quoting
Anthony Williams (alby.willi...@verizon.com):
>
>
>
> Can I piggy back on that inquiry and request a reset of my ISK points
> after committing a faux pas with respect to going negative from down v6
> tunnels and del
On 6/27/2013 3:43 PM, Måns Nilsson wrote:
Subject: Re: SixXS Contact Date: Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:47:51AM -0400 Quoting
Anthony Williams (alby.willi...@verizon.com):
Can I piggy back on that inquiry and request a reset of my ISK points
after committing a faux pas with respect to going nega
On Jun 26, 2013, at 4:40 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:06:10 -0400, "Justin M. Streiner" said:
>>> We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
>>> mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though their
>>> relationship w
As per our post:
http://blog.easydns.org/2013/06/27/dnsresolvers-open-resolvers-will-be-shut-down/
The DNSResolvers.com free and open public resolvers will be shut down,
imminently (like tonight, if we get DDoS-ed against them again).
We'll keep them up for awhile if we can so everybody can
On 6/27/2013 10:00 PM, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
As per our post:
http://blog.easydns.org/2013/06/27/dnsresolvers-open-resolvers-will-be-shut-down/
The DNSResolvers.com free and open public resolvers will be shut down,
imminently (like tonight, if we get DDoS-ed against them again).
We'll keep the
Hi Gang,
This question isn't strictly operational, but I'm needing a little
coaching. I am wanting to offer a broadband over T1 service and have the
infrastructure in place for aggregation of many of these over
channelized DS3. My desire is to simplify administration and require PPP
/ chap
11 matches
Mail list logo
