Hi,
> We're trying to implement VPLS PE Redundancy with Supervisor Engine 2T (VSS)
> as described in
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/white_paper_c11-663645.html#wp9000139
> and constantly failing. It seems so simple: set up a VSS, use LACP or PAgP
> port-chan
It's in our Martians ACL but we left it off of a couple of new border
connections and saw a good bit of it forwarded to us since Wednesday from
multiple ISPs.
Fixed now but still curious.
Thanks,
Buz
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:19 PM, George Herbert wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, cb.lis
Fiserv uses this address space for their ATM network.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Buz Dale wrote:
> It's in our Martians ACL but we left it off of a couple of new border
> connections and saw a good bit of it forwarded to us since Wednesday from
> multiple ISPs.
> Fixed now but still curio
Hello all,
I'm looking for a PoC in Symantec who could help me with an issue in
this report:
http://www.symantec.com/threatreport/topic.jsp?id=nam&aid=nam_malicious_activity_by_geo
I've already tried to contact the emails listed on the website, multiple
times, to no avail.
Contact me on private
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap
This report has been generated at Fri Mar 22 21:13:18 2013 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 14-Mar-13 -to- 21-Mar-13 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS840240868 1.8% 34.5 -- CORBINA-AS OJSC "Vimpelcom"
2 - AS982934916 1.6
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:16:57 -0500, Owen DeLong said:
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> > Based on the average clue of your average residential subscriber (anyone
> > here need not apply) I'd say that's a good thing.
> If BGP were plug-and-play automated with settings specifie
On 3/20/13, John Curran wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> However, if there were motivation on the provider side, automated BGP
>> configuration could enable consumers to attach to multiple providers and
>> actually reduce support calls significantly.
Do you really thin
9 matches
Mail list logo
