In a message written on Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:31:13AM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Probably only thing you could have done to plan against this, would have
> been to have solid dual-vendor strategy, to presume that sooner or later,
> software defect will take one vendor completely out. And maybe the
On 3/3/13 3:35 PM, "Vinod K" wrote:
>When we contacted Comcast for peering, Ren Provo explain that ratios r
>balanced b/c of their media and cloud products... imbalance is common
>misunderstanding.
ExactlyŠ
Jason
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> I know lot of vendors are fuzzing with 'codenomicon' and they appear not to
> have flowspec fuzzer.
i suspect they fuzz where the money is ...
number of users of bgp?
number of users of flowspec?
On (2013-03-04 06:51 -0800), Leo Bicknell wrote:
> From what I have heard so far there is something else they could
> have done, hire higher quality people.
Your solution to mistakes seem to be not to make them. I can understand the
train of thought, but I suspect the practicality of such advice.
Looks like whois.radb.net is returning blank results.
> pancake:/home/nick> whois -h whois.radb.net 198.41.0.0 | wc -l
>0
> pancake:/home/nick>
Those people who use the RADB IRRDB for generating filters / configuring
routers might like to do some runs in their testing environment to ens
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> whois -h whois.radb.net 198.41.0.0
fgets: Connection reset by peer
:( larry blunk has helped in the past to fix this...
On Mar 04, 2013, at 09:51 , Leo Bicknell wrote:
> Any competent network admin would have stopped and questioned a
> 90,000+ byte packet and done more investigation. Competent programmers
> writing their internal tools would have flagged that data as out
> of rage.
The last couple words are the
Hi,
NRTM still works according to my mirrors. So for up 2 date data, you could use
irr.ring.nlnog.net:
Alice:~ job$ whois -h irr.ring.nlnog.net 198.41.0.0 | wc -l
437
Alice:~ job$
Kind regards,
Job
On Mar 4, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:24
+1.
>From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
Original message
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore"
Date: 03/04/2013 11:46 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Cloudflare is down
On Mar 04, 2013, at 09:51 , Leo Bicknell wrote:
> Any competent ne
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
> Hi,
>
> NRTM still works according to my mirrors. So for up 2 date data, you could
> use irr.ring.nlnog.net:
>
> Alice:~ job$ whois -h irr.ring.nlnog.net 198.41.0.0 | wc -l
> 437
> Alice:~ job$
also, radb seems to have come back from t
Apologies, issues seem to have been caused by a slowish
memory leak in IRRd and the process had begun to swap
heavily when a regular maintenance thread ran.
Regards,
Larry
On 03/04/2013 12:40 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
Hi,
NRTM
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> will fix the problem. It won't. Next time the issue will be
> different, and the same undertrained person who missed the packet
> size this time will miss the next issue as well. They should all be
> sitting around saying, "how can we hire c
On (2013-03-04 13:23 -0500), Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> We have lots of stupid people in our industry because so few
> understand "The Way Things Work."
We have tendency to view mistakes we do as unavoidable human errors and
mistakes other people do as avoidable stupidity.
We should actively plan fo
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:40:58 +0200, Saku Ytti said:
> Most people design only against 3), often with design which actually
> increases likelihood of 2) and 1), reducing overall MTBF on design which
> strictly theoretically increases it.
I have to admit I've always suspect that MTBWTF would be a m
On 3 March 2013 23:31, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2013-03-03 12:46 -0800), Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
>
>> Definitely smart to be delegating your DNS to the web-accelerator
>> company and a single point of failure, especially if you are not just
>> running a web-site, but have some other independen
On (2013-03-04 12:33 -0800), Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> to use http-acceleration services without DNS tie-ins. Last I
> checked, CloudFlare didn't even let you setup just a subdomain for
> their service, e.g. they do require complete DNS control from the
> registrar-zone level, all the time,
The Pirate Bay have released a press release that they are now hosted
out of North Korea:
"The Pirate Bay has been hunted in many countries around the world.
This is truly an ironic situation. We have been fighting for a
free world, and our opponents are mostly huge corporations from the
Unite
Constantine A. Murenin(muren...@gmail.com)@Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 01:58:09PM
-0800:
> Dear NANOG@,
> Additionally, it seems like both yelp.com and retailmenot.com block
> the whole 173.230.144.0/20 from their web-sites, returning some
> graphical "403 Forbidden" pages instead.
> And in regards to
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2013-03-04 13:23 -0500), Jeff Wheeler wrote:
>
>> We have lots of stupid people in our industry because so few
>> understand "The Way Things Work."
>
> We have tendency to view mistakes we do as unavoidable human errors and
> mistakes other p
On 3/4/13 2:16 PM, Bill Weiss wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, I've contacted Yelp about this issue a number of
> times, and they're wholly uninterested in traffic from Linode. They're
> also unwilling to discuss the issue with someone coming from Linode. So,
> good luck on that front!
>
With
20 matches
Mail list logo
