It might be some T1 muxing issue
adam
-Original Message-
From: Mikeal Clark [mailto:mikeal.cl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:35 PM
To: Jared Mauch
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: MPLS acceptable latency?
The location in question is 7 T1s. They were not willing to giv
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:05:39 -0800, Kyle Creyts said:
> Jeez, isn't RPKI supposed to solve this problem?
That would presume the existence of a deployed system that
everybody actually used.
pgpSBbgRGoEqE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap
I think Heather was pointing out that this would be a good time to actually
use it.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:05:39 -0800, Kyle Creyts said:
> > Jeez, isn't RPKI supposed to solve this problem?
>
> That would presume the existence of a deployed system tha
This report has been generated at Fri Nov 16 21:13:09 2012 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 08-Nov-12 -to- 15-Nov-12 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS12880 77630 3.9% 575.0 -- DCI-AS Information Technology
Company (ITC)
2 - AS31692
6 matches
Mail list logo