Cisco default ARP timeout is 4 hours. Do anyone change that to
something shorter in a provider environment for customer with Ethernet
connectivity? What is a good value to set it to?
Are there any impacts for lowering the timeout? Other than higher CPU
util for doing ARP a lot more on the route
I regularly used to lower the ARP timeout to 5 minutes (to match the
mac-address-table aging limit) on devices running on ATM LAN-E segments and
saw no ill effects.
-saxon
On 10 August 2012 08:23, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> Cisco default ARP timeout is 4 hours. Do anyone change that to
> something
If there's anyone from Amazon SES around or anyone has a contact they
could share, please contact me off-list regarding some deliverability
issues they've been having
Malcolm Staudinger
Information Security Analyst
Earthlink
On (2012-08-10 10:23 -0400), Jay Nakamura wrote:
> Cisco default ARP timeout is 4 hours. Do anyone change that to
> something shorter in a provider environment for customer with Ethernet
> connectivity? What is a good value to set it to?
Maximum value should be your L2 MAC timeout. Most other v
I am using arp-timeout 900 (means 15min), because of having problems with
my upstream ethernet connection and everything is ok, and I have not seen
any relation between MAC Address aging time and that, aging time is default
300sec for me ;)
Thanks
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Jay Nakamura wro
Hi ...
This is my last resort. Apologies if this have been discussed before or if
is totally OT ... but i figured i could find some useful help here.
I need to find a good VPS provider in India where to setup a small set of
machines in a Virtual Internal Private network (L2TPD/IPSEC) and an
exten
On 8/10/12 9:14 AM, fc lists wrote:
> Hi ...
>
> This is my last resort. Apologies if this have been discussed before or if
> is totally OT ... but i figured i could find some useful help here.
>
> I need to find a good VPS provider in India where to setup a small set of
> machines in a Virtual I
i'm curious if there is any spec in the voip protocol suite that
allows one to maintain a call while changing networks?
what i want to do is setup a softphone on an android phone. however,
this won't work very well if i can't switch from wifi -> 3g -> wifi (i
doubt wifi -> wifi is possible because
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:18 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
> i'm curious if there is any spec in the voip protocol suite that
> allows one to maintain a call while changing networks?
>
> what i want to do is setup a softphone on an android phone. however,
> this won't work very well if i can't switch fr
Saku Ytti wrote the following on 8/10/2012 10:27 AM:
On (2012-08-10 10:23 -0400), Jay Nakamura wrote:
Cisco default ARP timeout is 4 hours. Do anyone change that to
something shorter in a provider environment for customer with Ethernet
connectivity? What is a good value to set it to?
Maximum
--- On Fri, 8/10/12, Blake Hudson wrote:
> From: Blake Hudson
> Subject: Re: Provider standard ARP Timeout?
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Date: Friday, August 10, 2012, 1:03 PM
> Saku Ytti wrote the following on
> 8/10/2012 10:27 AM:
> > On (2012-08-10 10:23 -0400), Jay Nakamura wrote:
> >
> >> Cis
This report has been generated at Fri Aug 10 21:13:03 2012 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 02-Aug-12 -to- 09-Aug-12 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS158 73992 2.9% 860.4 -- ERI-AS - Ericsson Network
Systems, Inc.
2 - AS8402
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Andrew Latham wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:18 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
>> i'm curious if there is any spec in the voip protocol suite that
>> allows one to maintain a call while changing networks?
>>
>> what i want to do is setup a softphone on an android pho
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:45 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Andrew Latham wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:18 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
>>> i'm curious if there is any spec in the voip protocol suite that
>>> allows one to maintain a call while changing networks?
>>>
On Aug 10, 2012 12:19 PM, "shawn wilson" wrote:
>
> i'm curious if there is any spec in the voip protocol suite that
> allows one to maintain a call while changing networks?
>
> what i want to do is setup a softphone on an android phone. however,
> this won't work very well if i can't switch from
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:14:22 +0100, fc lists said:
> The only requirements i have is that the VPS should be close enough to
> MUMBAI (don't have an ISP there yet so can't really say "close to what" )
> and that their are reliable from a network point of view.
Is hosting in another country that is
Hi Team,
FYI - Two prefixes from the DNS Changer/Rover Digital take down have been
re-allocated. One of the prefixes - 85.255.112.0/20 - was advertised Friday
morning. There is a blog post with some of the details here:
"Beware! DNS Changer’s IP Blocks are re-allocated and advertised!" -
http:
19 matches
Mail list logo
