> PC LOAD LETTER?!?!?!?!?
PC LOAD LETTER is not the issue.
One country that insists on using different paper sizes to everyone else, but
also happens to set a lot of hardware and software defaults is the issue :(
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:58:19PM -0500, James Wininger wrote:
> We would need to send notifications out to say about 400 customers.
> Ideally the system would send an attached PDF. It would be great if this
> system were SQL based etc.
(a) Use ASCII. Using PDF for this is insane.
(b) You're de
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Kulawiec [mailto:r...@gsp.org]
> Sent: 22 February 2012 11:04
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Customer Notification System.
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:58:19PM -0500, James Wininger wrote:
> > We would need to send notifications out to say about
Hi there,
Anyone know a way of simulate a Cisco CAT6500 IOS?
We're trying to deploy a lab of our production environment.
Thanks in advance,
Carlos.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
>> PC LOAD LETTER?!?!?!?!?
> PC LOAD LETTER is not the issue.
> One country that insists on using different paper sizes to everyone else, but
> also happens to set a lot of hardware and software defaults is the issue :(
LC LOAD A4
then.
--
-
Does anyone know of any company or organization deploying FCoE[1] in a
production environment? I'm curious how widely adopted this technology is.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibre_Channel_over_Ethernet
http://fcoe.com/
Thanks,
--
Jack Morgan
* Jack Morgan
> Does anyone know of any company or organization deploying FCoE[1] in
> a production environment? I'm curious how widely adopted this
> technology is.
FCoE was until very recently the only way to do centralized block
storage to the Cisco UCS server blades, so I'd imagine it's quite
What, no programmers in your NOC to roll your own?
---
#!/usr/bin/perl
use DBI;
# define variables ($sendmail, $from, $database... etc)
$dbh = DBI->connect("DBI:mysql:$database:$server", $user, $pass);
$mysearch = $dbh->prepare("SELECT customer,cid,email FROM $table WHERE
$find);
$mysearch->exe
Hi John,
Thanks for your answer but, as far as I know, with GNS3 we can't run a CAT6500
IOS.
Any alternative?
Cheers,
Carlos.
-Mensaje original-
De: John Kreno [mailto:john.kr...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: miércoles, 22 de febrero de 2012 15:25
Para: Carlos Asensio
Asunto: Re: Cisco CAT6
On 22/02/2012 15:36, Carlos Asensio wrote:
> Any alternative?
Ebay.
Nick
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your answer. We'll take it into proper consideration.
Any other alternatives?
Cheers,
Carlos.
-Mensaje original-
De: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
Enviado el: miércoles, 22 de febrero de 2012 16:41
Para: nanog@nanog.org
Asunto: Re: Cisco CAT6500 IOS Simulat
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Carlos Asensio wrote:
Not supported:
http://www.gns3.net/hardware-emulated/
-Hank
Hi John,
Thanks for your answer but, as far as I know, with GNS3 we can't run a CAT6500
IOS.
Any alternative?
Cheers,
Carlos.
-Mensaje original-
De: John Kreno [mailto:john.kr..
On Feb 22, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
>> PC LOAD LETTER?!?!?!?!?
>
> PC LOAD LETTER is not the issue.
>
> One country that insists on using different paper sizes to everyone else, but
> also happens to set a lot of hardware and software defaults is the issue :(
While there is some
NO.
There is no method. Go to Ebay and buy one. Sorry. Or if you are a big
enough customer you can ask Cisco to mock up your solution in one of
their labs.
-Hammer-
"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer
On 2/22/2012 9:48 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Carlos Asensio
On Feb 22, 2012 6:35 PM, "R. Scott Evans" wrote:
> ** NOTE - this is off the top of my head, ie.. not tested. That said,
> it's more or less a simplified version of what we do.
>
whoa. best humble brag I've seen in a few weeks, Scott. And that's saying a
lot considering this is NANOG.
On Feb 2
On 2/22/2012 7:02 AM, Jack Morgan wrote:
Does anyone know of any company or organization deploying FCoE[1] in a
production environment? I'm curious how widely adopted this technology is.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibre_Channel_over_Ethernet
http://fcoe.com/
Thanks,
I do
what wou
On 22/02/2012 15:50, Owen DeLong wrote:
> While there is some truth to this, in reality, if everyone else would
> just use 8.5" x 11", then, the US would no longer be different. :p
There are still two other countries in the world which only use imperial
measurements: Burma and Liberia. I can see
On 2/22/12 07:50 , Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
>
>>> PC LOAD LETTER?!?!?!?!?
>>
>> PC LOAD LETTER is not the issue.
>>
>> One country that insists on using different paper sizes to everyone else,
>> but also happens to set a lot of hardware and softwar
On 21/02/12 2:58 PM, James Wininger wrote:
We would need to send notifications out to say about 400 customers.
Ideally the system would send an attached PDF.
Why are you sending an attachment?
I hate it when businesses think that they will somehow improve my
reading experience by bloating up
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:09, Joel jaeggli wrote:
...
> If we just stop printing things the problem goes away.
I think Xerox promised me a paperless office
(starting in the 1980s?). I am still waiting.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:34:49AM -0800, JC Dill wrote:
>
> 99.999% of the time there is absolutely no benefit in the attachment.
> But by pushing customers to open attachments to get the content we are
> encouraging them to be complacent about opening all attachments, and
> that's a great wa
Hi
we want see a colocate at New York:
* Equinix or telehouse
* 1/4 or 1/2 rack (only private rack with 1/4 or 1/2 door)
* 1 Kva Dual Feeds
* 1 Cross Connect Fiber
* no internet.
If you know a good supplier ;=)
Thanks
Olivier
On 22-Feb-12 10:34, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:09, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> If we just stop printing things the problem goes away.
> I think Xerox promised me a paperless office (starting in the 1980s?). I am
> still waiting.
That's an odd thing to expect from a company t
Hi Carlos
Let me know offline what hardware you need.
Regards
Abdul
On 2/22/12 7:46 AM, "Carlos Asensio" wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Thanks for your answer. We'll take it into proper consideration.
>
> Any other alternatives?
>
> Cheers,
> Carlos.
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Nick H
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org]
>
> At the risk of offending many folks on NANOG, our industry is more
like
> a trade than a profession. In many cases we would do better to treat
> our people (in terms of how they are managed) like skilled trades,
> el
> FCoE was until very recently the only way to do centralized block storage
> to the Cisco UCS server blades, so I'd imagine it's quite widely adopted.
> That said, we don't run FCoE outside of the UCS - its uplinks
> to the SAN are just regular FC.
Agreed, very much the only implementation I ha
After reading a number of threads where people list their huge and
wasteful, but undoubtedly fun (and sometimes necessary?), home setups
complete with dedicated rooms and aircos I felt inclined to ask who has
attempted to make a really energy efficient setup?
This may be an interesting read, i
> Right now my always on server is a VIA artigo 1100 pico-itx system
> (replacing the G4 system) and my "router/firewall/modem" is still the el
> cheapo DSL modem (which runs busybox by the way). I have an upgraded
> workstation that's "sometimes on", it has a mini itx form factor (AMD
> phenom
Am 22.02.2012 um 22:48 schrieb Joe Greco:
> You also don't have to
> buy a MMS; the lower end Mac mini's are also plenty powerful, can be
> upgraded similarly, but lack OS X Server and the quad core CPU.
With 10.7, Server is now a $50 add-on download from the Mac App Store, no
special hardware r
I've run a SheevaPlug at home for a few years now. I don't do
anything fancy with it, but it does what I need it to do. Mostly that
is file server, web server, jump-box for network testing. Also
testing different linux software for this and that... (Quagga runs
nicely, but won't hold a full BGP
On 22 Feb 2012, at 22:04, "Stefan Bethke" wrote:
> Am 22.02.2012 um 22:48 schrieb Joe Greco:
>
>> You also don't have to
>> buy a MMS; the lower end Mac mini's are also plenty powerful, can be
>> upgraded similarly, but lack OS X Server and the quad core CPU.
>
> With 10.7, Server is now a $50
> Am 22.02.2012 um 22:48 schrieb Joe Greco:
> > You also don't have to
> > buy a MMS; the lower end Mac mini's are also plenty powerful, can be
> > upgraded similarly, but lack OS X Server and the quad core CPU.
>
> With 10.7, Server is now a $50 add-on download from the Mac App Store, no
> speci
On Feb 17, 2012, at 18:55, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I also think that when we spend too many consecutive weeks/months/years
> behind a desk without going out in the real world, we become progressively
> more detached from the operational reality where our designs have to operate.
In software, this
Leigh Porter wrote:
You dudes need to get with the times and put all this stuff in the cloud.
Ok so I joke a little..
The "cloud" seems to be a more modern implementation of the mainframe
"paradigm" (and now I feel soiled having used 2 such words in one
sentence). It has its uses, though it'
Marcel Plug wrote:
I've run a SheevaPlug at home for a few years now. I don't do
anything fancy with it, but it does what I need it to do. Mostly that
I wonder how reliable the storage is in these things. Is it comparable
to modern SSDs?
Oh and I also have native IPv6 on my DSL. I like t
On 22 Feb 2012, at 22:40, "Jeroen van Aart" wrote:
> Leigh Porter wrote:
>> You dudes need to get with the times and put all this stuff in the cloud.
>> Ok so I joke a little..
>
> The "cloud" seems to be a more modern implementation of the mainframe
> "paradigm" (and now I feel soiled having
> On 22 Feb 2012, at 22:04, "Stefan Bethke" wrote:
> > Am 22.02.2012 um 22:48 schrieb Joe Greco:
> >=20
> >> You also don't have to
> >> buy a MMS; the lower end Mac mini's are also plenty powerful, can be
> >> upgraded similarly, but lack OS X Server and the quad core CPU.
> >=20
> > With 10.7, S
yep, we're doing FCoE in an EMC Symettric, ESX, Nexus environment. All of our
FCoE is over 10gb CNAs. We are having good results, though we hit an odd bug
on QLogics cards initially on pur HP DL 580s (affected twinax only -- if you
dropped on uplink , ie testing failover, throughput dropped to
our reason btw was to cut down on cabling/switch costs, it starts to add up
when you consider how many blades get eated by 1gb copper. going to DL580s amd
a few hp chassis. A chassis used to eat nearly 64 copper 1gb and 32 fiber
channel connections. on FCoE/CNAs, we're literally talking 4 x 1
Joe Greco wrote:
Quite frankly, it's a little horrifying how quickly people have embraced
not owning their own resources. On one hand, sure, it's great not to have
to worry about some aspects of it all, but on the other hand...
The web sites that we entrust our data to can, and do, vanish:
Hi,
I'm hoping to get a hold of an abuse contact at colosolutions.com.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
If so, please contact me offlist.
Cheers,
Carlos.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
>
> I wonder how reliable the storage is in these things. Is it comparable to
> modern SSDs?
No issues so far. As I said though, I don't push it too hard. I
don't have any specs or stats off hand, so I can't get any more
detailed.
I use a
Marcel Plug wrote:
No issues so far. As I said though, I don't push it too hard. I
don't have any specs or stats off hand, so I can't get any more
detailed.
What's the speed like?
I'm pretty happy with them, I just wish my DLink would stop requiring reboots...
I assume you connected it to
Well there isn't anything wrong with the mail list approach, but it is more
complicated than sending email to a list of customers. We have several types of
services (transport, ss7, managed Noc svc etc). Having the db backend would
give us flexibility for future notifications based on type of s
--As of February 22, 2012 3:48:42 PM -0600, Joe Greco is alleged to have
said:
Right now my always on server is a VIA artigo 1100 pico-itx system
(replacing the G4 system) and my "router/firewall/modem" is still the el
cheapo DSL modem (which runs busybox by the way). I have an upgraded
worksta
Well we would not be sending the notification in an attachment, but there are
times when it would be nice to send a list of circuit ids (exported from
billing system as PDF) or some other exported doc to the notification.
--
Jim Wininger
Indiana Fiber Network
Desk - 317-777-7114
Cell - 317-432
http://www.sol.net/tmp/nanog/toolbox2.jpg
A sweet memoriesthe 3COM/USR screwdriver. Nice to see someone still has
one.
--
Jim Wininger
On Feb 18, 2012, at 9:41 AM, "Joe Greco" wrote:
>> Do you guys ride your bike to the colo and show up in shorts and a
>> t-shirt? Who goes to the
On 02/22/12 21:13, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> I felt inclined to ask who has attempted to make a really energy
> efficient setup?
My current always-on home server is:
- 3U rackmount box, Supermicro H8SGL, 450 watt '80-plus platinum' PSU
- 8-core Opteron 6128 _underclocked_ to 800Mhz
- 16 GB of EC
don't filter your customers. when they leak the world to you, it will
get you a lot of free press and your marketing department will love you.
just ask telstra.
randy
Who once said, there is no such thing as bad press?
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/dodo-takes-blame-for-internet-outage-affecting-millions-20120223-1tpqq.html
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/291364,telstra-router-causes-major-internet-outage.aspx
"Dodo has revealed a "minor hardw
> "Dodo has revealed a "minor hardware issue" was behind a Telstra
> outage that impacted multiple service providers and internet services
> nationwide"
bs, trying to blame it on a vendor.
a customer leaked a full table to smellstra, and they had not filtered.
hence the $subject.
and things when
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
\
> and things when further downhill from there, when telstra also did not
> filter what they announced to their peers, and the peers went over
> prefix limits and dropped bgp.
Oh! so protections worked!
>:)
>> and things when further downhill from there, when telstra also did not
>> filter what they announced to their peers, and the peers went over
>> prefix limits and dropped bgp.
> Oh! so protections worked!
imiho, prefix count is too big a hammer.
it would have been better if optus had irr-based
IOS-XR
On 2/23/12, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> and things when further downhill from there, when telstra also did not
>>> filter what they announced to their peers, and the peers went over
>>> prefix limits and dropped bgp.
>> Oh! so protections worked!
>
> imiho, prefix count is too big a hammer.
>
>
I'm laughing now, but it wasn't funny a couple of hours ago. Seems a lot of the
.au govt needs to learn some carrier diversity...
On 23/02/2012, at 4:41 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> don't filter your customers. when they leak the world to you, it will
> get you a lot of free press and your marketin
55 matches
Mail list logo
