Hi Randy
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Randy Carpenter wrote:
One major issue is that there is no way to associate a user's MAC (for
IPv4) with their DUID. I haven't been able to find a way to account for
this without making the user authenticate once for IPv4, and then again
for IPv6. This is cumb
On 23 January 2012 04:05, Jacob Taylor wrote:
..
>
> Tahoe-lafs can be fast. A grid I help out with is often capable of
> 600kilobyte/per/second downloads (or faster), and I personally have
> several files stored on there in excess of 500mb. Close enough to your
> 700mb movie example.
>
> I use th
All,
The NANOG Program Committee is proud to announce that the final agenda for NANOG 54 has been posted at
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog54/agenda.php . We encourage you to get in early on Sunday to take
advantage of the great tutorials that we have lined up:
Introduction to Shell and
You shouldn't assume a MAC isn't constant. Our students spoof their
MACs all the time (thinking it will save them from getting a DMCA
notice).
The RFC suggests that DUIDs are stored in non-volatile memory or that
an algorithm be used that can consistently reproduce the DUID (and
IAID) for a syste
"You shouldn't assume a MAC isn't constant" should read "is", double
negative failure.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> You shouldn't assume a MAC isn't constant. Our students spoof their
> MACs all the time (thinking it will save them from getting a DMCA
> notice).
>
> The RF
Hello folks,
I would like to chime in on this thread. I have great interest in how this
plays out. The Jagornet DHCPv6 Server is capable of providing specific
addresses to clients based upon DUID and IAID using a filtering mechanism
supported in the configuration file. Of course, predicting what
They are competing in some things. There are differences that will make you choose ASR1000 over MX
series, but alot of people are choosing either one of the other for many of the same jobs, mainly
upgrading to straight-forward L3 1/10 gig aggregation. I know some people who've had ASR1000s and
I understand that MACs can be changed/spoofed. But that is the exception, not
the rule.
That isn't the biggest issue, though. The biggest issue is how to correlate the
MAC and the DUID. That is the only way to properly authenticate and account for
users that have both v4 and v6 (which is every
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 11:50:37 PM Matt Craig wrote:
> They are competing in some things. There are differences
> that will make you choose ASR1000 over MX series, but
> alot of people are choosing either one of the other for
> many of the same jobs, mainly upgrading to
> straight-forward L
As we're talking about "the exception, not the rule" I'll note that
the majority of systems generate their DUID based on the MAC address
of their adapter.
ISC DHCPd does in fact allow you to configure static assignments using
MAC and will match a DUID that was generated for that MAC.
Assuming the
>
> We reviewd the MLX against the 7600 and M320 many years ago.
> These days it would be the MLX against the ASR9000 and MX240/480/960.
> It didn't have the feature set we needed, but that was a while back.
>
> Our national exchange point have been happy with them, using VPLS to
> run the fabric
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 02:24:28 AM George Bonser
wrote:
> You might get by these days at a peering point with
> something smaller if you are a smaller network and don't
> need a lot of 10G. Something like a Brocade CER-RT
> series. A 1U box with 136 Gbps of throughput that will
> handle
> We looked at their CER/CES line back in 2009/2010 when we were scoping
> for kit to deploy our MPLS In The Access topology.
>
> That time, the box only did 512,000 entries in the FIB, but clearly the
> newer iron has had an upgrade on the inside :-).
> This is good!
>
> Inevitably, we settled f
13 matches
Mail list logo
