Quick question for those who have researched things more closely. I have signed
all my forward zones and think I've crossed my I's and dotted my T's, but one
thing I'm not sure of...
Are we supposed to setup signing for reverse dns zones?
__
Eric Esslinger
Information Se
> Are we supposed to setup signing for reverse dns zones?
yes
Eric J Esslinger (eesslinger) writes:
> Quick question for those who have researched things more closely. I have
> signed all my forward zones and think I've crossed my I's and dotted my T's,
> but one thing I'm not sure of...
>
> Are we supposed to setup signing for reverse dns zones?
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Regnauld [mailto:regna...@nsrc.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:18 AM
> To: Eric J Esslinger
> Cc: 'nanog@nanog.org'
> Subject: Re: Dnssec and ptr records
>
>
> Eric J Esslinger (eesslinger) writes:
> > Quick question for those who have researched
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:13:54AM -0500, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
> Quick question for those who have researched things more closely. I have
> signed all my forward zones and think I've crossed my I's and dotted my T's,
> but one thing I'm not sure of...
>
> Are we supposed to setup signing for
At 9:13 -0500 10/18/11, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
Are we supposed to setup signing for reverse dns zones?
To the DNS, a zone is a zone. The terms "forward" and "reverse" as
zone adjectives were invented by humans. ;)
The high-level view of signing the "reverse zones" is the same as for
"for
On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
> Well it makes sense we should, just that all the examples, discussion, and
> such I've read dealt with forward records.
>
> I guess I get to dig some more. Thanks.
Eric -
Your in-addr zone first needs to be signed and then the DS
record
(Presuming, of course, that you've got an ARIN assignment
or allocation. If you're in a provider-assigned block,
you'll need to chat with your ISP about the DS linkage
for your PTR zones... /John )
On Oct 18, 2011, at 12:31 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Eric J Esslinger
> -Original Message-
> From: John Curran [mailto:jcur...@arin.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:56 AM
> To: Eric J Esslinger
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: Dnssec and ptr records
>
>
> (Presuming, of course, that you've got an ARIN assignment
> or allocation.
On 18 Oct 2011, at 22:06, Cutler James R wrote:
> Since the message in question was not seen on the full list, it probably came
> from the MS event attendance list.
and they were quite open at the event about wanting contact details for
recruitment purposes...
f
On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Babak Pasdar wrote:
> Is Microsoft trying to poach people off the NANOG list? IMHO this is
> inappropriate.
There's a lot more than just MS doing it after this NANOG, and it's damned
annoying. I've had it happen over the years just a few times, but it's
unprecede
On 10/18/2011 10:02 PM, Brett Watson wrote:
There's a lot more than just MS doing it after this NANOG, and it's
damned annoying. I've had it happen over the years just a few times,
but it's unprecedented this year, as far as I'm concerned (and did I
mentioned damned annoying?). -b
That's why
Hi!
We're currently evaluating web hosting providers in the APAC region and
one of the criteria that we are currently considering is the
availability of routes going to the web hosting provider.
In this regard, I would like to ask for your idea regarding this. Is
it safe to conclude that t
13 matches
Mail list logo
