* Eugen Leitl:
> The notorious fax spammer (Swiss Money Report,
> European Money Report, etc; Altanus Ltd.) is
> currently residing in 91.223.119/24
> (91.223.119.174), which is registered to
> Traian Zoran Tariceanu, First Media Service Ltd.
>
> The contacts at @fmsss.info bounce. What is the
> p
On May 15, 2011, at 8:55 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> On 5/15/2011 7:08 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> On May 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> ...and we'll agree to disagree on this one (RTMFP)... and users will just
>>> be ok with BitTorrent and Skype not working on the v6-on
On 16 mei 2011, at 9:31, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I believe that the BitTorrent clients
> are smart enough to discard the IPv4 nodes reached through NAT64 and will,
> instead, just
> use the native IPv6 nodes. I don't see this as a problem and I"m not sure why
> you do.
Because that way the IPv4 an
>
> Because that way the IPv4 and IPv6 swarms remain disconnected in the
> absence of some dual stack peers. (I.e., if the swarm is small and
> you're the only IPv6 participant.)
>
> It would be much better if you could go from IPv6 to IPv4 through a
> NAT64.
The problem is when the client is ha
The best abuse contact response I ever got was an under 3 hour reply
to a lesser known domain provider who revoked the domain for the
Facebook scam. It was hilarious and I don't think even GoDaddy
responded within 3 days or so.
A part of me wants to say we should look out for people while another
KSK CEREMONY 5
The fifth KSK ceremony for the root zone took place in Culpeper,
VA, USA on Wednesday 2011-05-11. The Ceremony Administrator was
Mehmet Akcin. The ceremony was completed successfully.
Video from Ceremony 5 was recorded for audit purposes. Video and
associated audit materials will
On 15 May 2011, at 22:55, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> On 5/15/2011 7:08 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> On May 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> ...and we'll agree to disagree on this one (RTMFP)... and users will just
>>> be ok with BitTorrent and Skype not working on the v6-only
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
>
> Something like:
> -I FORWARD -j DROP
> -I FORWARD -s 2001:db8::/64 -j ACCEPT
> -I FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
Double check the kernel version you have. IIRC kernels before 2.6.20
didn't have the ability to do
On 05/14/2011 07:39 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
Jim Gettys writes:
... we have to get naming squared away. Typing IPv6 addresses is for the
birds, and having everyone have to go fuss with a DNS provider isn't a
viable solution.
perhaps i'm too close to the problem because that solution looks quite
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:37:46 -0400
> From: Jim Gettys
>
> > perhaps i'm too close to the problem because that solution looks quite
> > viable to me. dns providers who don't keep up with the market (which
> > means ipv6+dnssec in this context) will lose business to those who do.
>
> I don't
I am curious to understand how copper Ethernet keepalive are used and work
between a host or router and a switch?
Cisco default keepalive is 10 seconds with 3 or 5 retries, does this mean
30s or 50s to detect copper link failure??
I may miss something, thanks for your help.
The link failure dete
On May 16, 2011, at 1:56 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 16 mei 2011, at 9:31, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> I believe that the BitTorrent clients
>> are smart enough to discard the IPv4 nodes reached through NAT64 and will,
>> instead, just
>> use the native IPv6 nodes. I don't see this as a pr
On May 16, 2011, at 2:10 AM, George Bonser wrote:
>>
>> Because that way the IPv4 and IPv6 swarms remain disconnected in the
>> absence of some dual stack peers. (I.e., if the swarm is small and
>> you're the only IPv6 participant.)
>>
>> It would be much better if you could go from IPv6 to IPv
Greetings all.
I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing software
against commercially available off the shelf hardware such as F5, which is what
we currently use. We use the load balancers for traditional load balancing,
full proxy for http/ssl traffic, ssl termina
On May 16, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 07:39 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>> Jim Gettys writes:
>>
>>> ... we have to get naming squared away. Typing IPv6 addresses is for the
>>> birds, and having everyone have to go fuss with a DNS provider isn't a
>>> viable solution.
>> p
In message <51008.1305573...@nsa.vix.com>, Paul Vixie writes:
> > Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:37:46 -0400
> > From: Jim Gettys
> >
> > > perhaps i'm too close to the problem because that solution looks quite
> > > viable to me. dns providers who don't keep up with the market (which
> > > means ip
On 5/16/2011 3:13 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:37:46 -0400
From: Jim Gettys
perhaps i'm too close to the problem because that solution looks quite
viable to me. dns providers who don't keep up with the market (which
means ipv6+dnssec in this context) will lose business to th
S/W vs H/W is really a question rooted in performance and feature
needs vs cost... weigh your options carefully.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Welch, Bryan wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing
> software against commercially availab
We used Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound) on a couple of FreeBSD servers
some years ago.
Configuration is simple and the software has lots of good and interesting
features.
The only problem was that always our traffic had a spike, serving pages
through it became a nightmare.
Eventually we ended
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:37 PM, William Cooper wrote:
> S/W vs H/W is really a question rooted in performance and feature
> needs vs cost... weigh your options carefully.
Load balancers are _both_ hardware and software.
There's really no such thing as a load balancer solution
that is just hardwa
Ø I have had great success with ha proxy http://haproxy.1wt.eu/ -Randy
Can you elaborate on your config?
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Welch, Bryan
mailto:bryan.we...@arrisi.com>> wrote:
Greetings all.
I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing software
aga
> From: Owen DeLong
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 16:12:27 -0700
>
> ... It's not like you can even reach anything at home now, let alone
> reach it by name.
that must and will change. let's be the generation who makes it possible.
In message <80660.1305606...@nsa.vix.com>, Paul Vixie writes:
> > From: Owen DeLong
> > Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 16:12:27 -0700
> >
> > ... It's not like you can even reach anything at home now, let alone
> > reach it by name.
>
> that must and will change. let's be the generation who makes it p
> -Original Message-
> From: George Bonser [mailto:gbon...@seven.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 2:10 AM
> To: Iljitsch van Beijnum; Owen DeLong
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: RE: Yahoo and IPv6
>
> >
> > Because that way the IPv4 and IPv6 swarms remain disconnected in the
> > absence of so
24 matches
Mail list logo
