Hi!
would someone at SIXXS please contact me off-list regarding an account
issue?
Contact
The main contact address for SixXS is i...@sixxs.net, which is the sole
email address one should use to contact SixXS. Non-English, impolite,
clueless, UCE and HTML email gets discarded automatically. T
Hi all
May I have your recommendation regarding any outage management software and
NOC log book(preferably open source) .
I want to get fresh ideas about available software in this area.
The below scenario may explain what I am looking for:
One of the sites gets down, monitoring team would log i
Zabbix allows to acknowledge events with a comment.
On 4/25/11 22:47 , "Payam Poursaied" wrote:
>Hi all
>May I have your recommendation regarding any outage management software
>and NOC log book(preferably open source) .
>I want to get fresh ideas about available software in this area.
>
>The b
On Apr 23, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Kevin Day wrote:
> In the beta, it's automatically enabled if you have native IPv6 (non-6to4,
> non-Teredo).
> [...]
> For those of you with Help Desks who have to support users like this, the
> associated setting in the game's Options menu is apparently called "Ena
Have you tried otrs?
On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:47 PM, "Payam Poursaied" wrote:
> Hi all
> May I have your recommendation regarding any outage management software and
> NOC log book(preferably open source) .
> I want to get fresh ideas about available software in this area.
>
> The below scenar
On 4/25/2011 4:07 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> would someone at SIXXS please contact me off-list regarding an account
>> issue?
>
> Contact
> The main contact address for SixXS is i...@sixxs.net, which is the
> sole email address one should use to contact SixXS. Non-English,
> impolite,
On 04/22/2011 07:24 PM, Lynda wrote:
Non existent, it's SPF only.
My point.
Nearly all of the spam I see is DKIM signed. It just makes messages
bigger. I'd just as soon our volunteers spend their times on other
things, myself.
DKIM isn't designed explicitly to stop spam, it's designed to id
On 4/22/2011 4:24 PM, Lynda wrote:
Nearly all of the spam I see is DKIM signed. It just makes messages bigger.
I'd just as soon our volunteers spend their times on other things, myself.
In the off-chance you are assuming that the presence of a DKIM signature is
supposed to mean something abo
Or RT-IR
Regards,
Alex
On 4/25/11, Nathanael Cariaga wrote:
> Have you tried otrs?
>
>
>
> On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:47 PM, "Payam Poursaied" wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>> May I have your recommendation regarding any outage management software
>> and NOC log book(preferably open source) .
>> I want to get
Hi
Otrs seems to be a ticketing system. We are using RT (bestpractical)
as our ticketing system and our monitoring guys use RT to issue a
trouble ticket to our maintenance team.
Sometimes something happened by our upstream provider and for example
in less than 7 minutes resolved.
In all cases monit
I personally would take Riverbed over Cisco for one main reason that I have
discovered when I was researching them (that was good 3-4 years ago and
cisco may have "improved" since).
Cisco "accelerates" based on application. That is to say if it's not a well
known application protocol, they do not
On 04/25/2011 01:55 PM, Andrey Khomyakov wrote:
I personally would take Riverbed over Cisco for one main reason that I have
discovered when I was researching them (that was good 3-4 years ago and
cisco may have "improved" since).
Yes, they have improved dramatically in the last few years since
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
Yes, repeatedly. The response was non-existent, or simply unfortunate,
so I'm trying other avenues.
I see this quite a lot. I guess one gets what one pays for (or doesn't pay
for).
Speaking of which, is there an IPv6 tunnel broker that actually char
Some other considerations for Cisco vs. Riverbed are:
Unified vs. Partitioned Data Store:
Riverbed's data store is unified across all connected appliances, whereas
Cisco partitions its data store across each connected appliance. This means
that a data pattern seen once on Riverbed will be "warm"
Eleven days ago, I reported here the following highly probable hijacks:
AS8143
AS29987
AS11756
AS47024
AS27906
198.23.32.0/20 - NET-198-23-32-0-1
198.57.64.0/20 - NET-198-57-64-0-1
199.88.32.0/20 - NET-199-88-32-0-1
199.192.16.0/20 - NET-199-192-16-0-1
199.196.192.0/19 - NET-199-196-192-0-1
200.
Ron,
On Apr 25, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> 199.88.32.0/20 - NET-199-88-32-0-1
> 199.196.192.0/19 - NET-199-196-192-0-1
> 200.107.216.0/21 - GT-AGSA1-LACNIC
> 204.147.240.0/20 - NET-204-147-240-0-1
>
> As I previously mentioned, these are being used by high-end snowshoe spammi
In message ,
David Conrad wrote:
>> Simple question: Does anybody give a damn?
>
>I suspect a lot of folks do, however giving a damn and having the
>ability to do anything about it may not coincide.
Do you or your company connect to Level3, TimeWarner, or Tiscali?
For those that do, maybe th
On 4/25/2011 3:51 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
>
>> Yes, repeatedly. The response was non-existent, or simply
>> unfortunate, so I'm trying other avenues.
>
> I see this quite a lot. I guess one gets what one pays for (or doesn't
> pay for).
>
> Speaking
On 4/25/11 8:12 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote:
Speaking of which, is there an IPv6 tunnel broker that actually
> charges money and where one can get real support? I would like to be
> able to refer people who complain about SIXXS and others offering
> support below expectation from some users.
>
Thi
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
But if these two groups want people to take IPv6 seriously (you know,
before the ceiling comes down on our heads), maybe they should take it
seriously.
Having run a volunteer service before, I can tell you there are a lot of
people complaining about t
20 matches
Mail list logo
