On 14 apr 2011, at 8:33, Tore Anderson wrote:
> Actually, they're already empty. Chinanet Fujian Province Network
> allocated 498432 addresses today, spread out over 1102(!) individual
> prefixes in the range /21-/24.
Where do you see this? On ftp.apnic.net I see delegated-apnic-
second-level gTLD domain names.
http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/20110414-snowshoe-1.txt
http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/20110414-snowshoe-2.txt
Dredging into this operation more deeply led me to the following con-
clusions...
Based upon information and belief, the following number resources have
been
do you see this? On ftp.apnic.net I see
> delegated-apnic-20110414 which only contains info upto the 13th and
> has a timestamp of Apr 13 15:15.
>
> Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million regular + 2.27 M
> legacy = 19.84 M total address space, so another 0.5 M wouldn'
On 14 apr 2011, at 13:50, Tore Anderson wrote:
>> This is address space that's now marked as delegated and removed from
>> the pile of unused address space for no obvious reason.
> I believe they are using those prefixes for research.
> and the delegated-extended file, it appears that these pref
> That is extremely curious. How can they justify taking 4 million addresses
> for research two days before running out of regularly allocatable address
> space? They could have taken that /10 out of the final /8 rather than taking
> it from the last scraps of regular space if they really need a
On Apr 14, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 14 apr 2011, at 13:50, Tore Anderson wrote:
>
>>> This is address space that's now marked as delegated and removed from
>>> the pile of unused address space for no obvious reason.
>
>> I believe they are using those prefixes for rese
Hello
I would like to ask general question about switch speed experience.
How can I increase speed in switch port?
ls it to combine more than one port? Any other solution?
In combing ports, what are the advantages and disadvantages?
Any info and experience. Thank you for your sharing.
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:47:32 -0500, Deric Kwok
wrote:
Hello
I would like to ask general question about switch speed experience.
How can I increase speed in switch port?
The speed of the switch port is limited by the hardware. Make sure you are
running a nic capable of the maximum switch
On 14 apr 2011, at 13:02, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million regular + 2.27 M legacy =
> 19.84 M total address space, so another 0.5 M wouldn't deplete what's left.
I just got the 15 apr file which has the info for 14 apr (sigh...) and indeed
1100 bl
Recently, Microsoft Australia has been refused a temp allocation (like
they had every year) for one of their conferences.
On 4/15/11 9:01 , "Iljitsch van Beijnum" wrote:
>On 14 apr 2011, at 13:02, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
>> Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million regular + 2.27 M
Could someone from the IT department for the City of Panama City Beach, Florida
please contact me off-list?
Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg
http://www.pcbgov.com/city_directory.htm
Seems like it wouldn't be hard to track down that information...
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Eisenberg [mailto:nat...@atlasnetworks.us]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 2:21 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Contact for City of Panama City Beach,
All… as of early this morning, APNIC is empty.
Last /8 Policy is now in effect.
...Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeev
On 15 apr 2011, at 0:04, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> All… as of early this morning, APNIC is empty.
Why do you say that? Do you have information that contradicts my numbers?
Just an email from APNIC 3 hours ago to all regional mailing lists.
Kinda authoritative I would say.
---
On 15/04/11 6:25 AM, "APNIC Secretariat"
mailto:apnic-no-re...@apnic.net>> wrote:
___
APNIC IPv4 Address Pool Reaches F
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dill [mailto:d...@harsch.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 3:03 PM
> To: Nathan Eisenberg; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Contact for City of Panama City Beach, FL?
>
> http://www.pcbgov.com/city_directory.htm
>
> Seems like it wouldn't be hard to trac
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:02:36 -0700
Dan Dill wrote:
> http://www.pcbgov.com/city_directory.htm
>
> Seems like it wouldn't be hard to track down that information...
Can you identify where on that page it lists a contact for the IT
department of the Panama City government?
I can't, because it doe
- Original Message -
> From: "William Pitcock"
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:02:36 -0700
> Dan Dill wrote:
> > http://www.pcbgov.com/city_directory.htm
> >
> > Seems like it wouldn't be hard to track down that information...
>
> Can you identify where on that page it lists a contact for the
Yes, two in one day. Wholesalers don't wipe device configs, apparently.
Anyways, would a technical contact for va.gov please contact me off-list?
Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg
Wouldn't the world be a better place if the ARIN contact information
was correct and usable. It would be nice to have an easy place for
these types of requests. I guess maybe this list is that place.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
> Yes, two in one day.
I pinged a buddy of mine at the VA. No word yet and I'm working from Sydney
this week so a bit delayed anyhow...
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Bret Palsson [mailto:b...@getjive.com]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 11:46 AM
To: Nathan Eisenberg
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Contact for v
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
wrote:
> Yes, two in one day. Wholesalers don't wipe device configs, apparently.
>
> Anyways, would a technical contact for va.gov please contact me off-list?
>
> Best Regards,
> Nathan Eisenberg
>
Is tracking down the original user and letting t
It would be far more effective if more organizations set up and maintained a
slash-security page (see the NIAC Vulnerability Disclosure Framework for
details). This is _exactly_ the kind of information that should be posted there.
Jim
--
James N. Duncan, CISSP
Manager, Juniper Networks
> Is tracking down the original user and letting them know about the
> config leak a standard practice, necessary or "the right thing to do"?
Municipal networks often provide some emergency services, and we all know what
the VA provides. Once you know whose gear it is, I guess you have to decid
On 04/14/2011 07:54 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
Is tracking down the original user and letting them know about the
config leak a standard practice, necessary or "the right thing to do"?
Municipal networks often provide some emergency services, and we all know what
the VA provides. Once you kn
25 matches
Mail list logo
