hello
i have an as-set that has some members, other as-sets.
can i exclude some members from my as-set members?
as-set: me
members: as-set-1, as-set-2, as-set-3
as-set-3 has some members that i want to exlude; let's say as-set-xxx,
is a member of as-set as-set-3
is there something like
members
Hi Bogdan,
If you are on Cisco, you can accomplish this using the attribute-map argument
to the as-set statement. On Juniper, this is fairly easy to accomplish with
routing policy (learning RegEx will make your life easier).
HTHs.
Stefan
(sorry for the top post, I'm on my mobile...)
- Re
hi
i am using cisco and rtconfig.
On 02.04.2011 15:47, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> If you are on Cisco, you can accomplish this using the attribute-map
> argument to the as-set statement. On Juniper, this is fairly easy to
> accomplish with routing policy (learning RegEx will make you
On 02/04/2011 12:32, Bogdan wrote:
as-set-3 has some members that i want to exlude; let's say as-set-xxx,
is a member of as-set as-set-3
is there something like
members: as-set-1, as-set-2, as-set-3 and not as-set-xxx ?
No, you can't do this in an as-set definition. What you can do is
specif
On 02.04.2011 19:41, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 02/04/2011 12:32, Bogdan wrote:
>> as-set-3 has some members that i want to exlude; let's say as-set-xxx,
>> is a member of as-set as-set-3
>>
>> is there something like
>> members: as-set-1, as-set-2, as-set-3 and not as-set-xxx ?
>
> No, you can't d
Hello,
Regarding Embratel contacts, you can use: b...@embratel.net.br and
netad...@embratel.net.br.
Regards,
Alessandro Martins
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 21:14, Mark Wall wrote:
> Is there anyone from GVT or Embratel with a clue willing to help me with a
> BGP route issue we are seeing?
>
> Tha
Folks,
The Canadian telecommunications regulator, the CRTC, has just launched a public
notice with possible worldwide implications IMHO, Telecom Notice of
Consultation CRTC 2011-206:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2011/2011-206.htm
I think this is the very first regulatory inquiry into IP t
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:33:07PM +0100, Robert Lusby wrote:
>> Looking at hosting some servers in Hong Kong, to serve the APAC region. Our
>> client is worried that this may slow things down in their Australia region,
>> and are wondering
In a message written on Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 04:00:30PM -0400, Francois Menard
wrote:
> One of the postulates that I intend to defend, is that in the
> PSTN today, in addition to interconnecting for the purpose of
> exchanging voice calls, it is possible to LOCALLY (at the Local
> Interconnection
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> The PSTN "features" fixed, known bandwidth. QoS isn't really the
> right term. When I nail up a BRI, I know I have 128kb of bandwidth,
> never more, never less. There is no function on that channel similar
> to IP QoS.
The PSTN also has exa
I may regret wading into this one
Regarding posting from a Gmail account, I'm also posting from a non-work
account, for two reasons. One, our company policy is to tag an annoying
legal disclaimer onto every outbound message, and two, I don't want
anything I say on this list to come back on
Also remember, you would be serving Australia only from Australia. if I'm
not mistaken, the Australia backbone is more or less volume based
cahrged...
http://www.aarnet.edu.au/services/aarnet-charging.aspx
"AARNet3 charges are different for Shareholders (Members) and for Non
Shareholders (Associat
On 03/04/2011, at 8:42 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
Also remember, you would be serving Australia only from Australia. if I'm
not mistaken, the Australia backbone is more or less volume based
cahrged...
AARNET is the Academic and Research Network, it's not "THE" backbone. (Note:
in previous incarn
In a message written on Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 07:00:52PM -0400, Jeff Wheeler
wrote:
> I don't agree with this. IMO all DDoS traffic would suddenly be
> marked into the highest priority forwarding class that doesn't have an
> absurdly low policer for the DDoS source's access port, and as a
> result
14 matches
Mail list logo
