On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> Maybe I read your question wrong, but null-routing things at your border is
> often not very useful if the traffic is flooding your transit links. Most
> transits publish their community lists - you just need to tag the prefix you
> want to b
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:42:28 -0500, David Hubbard wrote
> I was wondering if anyone has a howto floating around on the
> step by step setup of having an internal bgp peer for sending
> quick updates to border routers to null route sources of
> undesirable traffic? I've seen it discussed on nanog f
Team Cymru has some really good examples on how to configure something
similar (utilizing their BOGON feed).
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bgp.html
Scroll down to "AUTOMATICALLY FILTERING BOGONS" for IOS, JUNOS, etc examples
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:42 PM, David Hubbard <
dhubb...@d
On 22/02/11 10:38 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
The other CERT: Community Emergency Response Team.
https://www.citizencorps.gov/cert/about.shtm
+1 for CERT. I also think that taking a CERT class is a great way to
re-evaluate your own network emergency procedures. You may find new
ways to prep
Steve Linford wrote:
APEWS is one of the many fringe hobby DNSBLs run from kids bedrooms.
I don't deny APEWS is pretty much useless, though I disagree with the
(perceived) condescending sentiment about hobby projects. Many
successful enterprises sprung from hobby projects.
Greetings,
Jeroen
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Steve Linford wrote:
>>
>> APEWS is one of the many fringe hobby DNSBLs run from kids bedrooms.
>
> I don't deny APEWS is pretty much useless, though I disagree with the
> (perceived) condescending sentiment about hobby projects. Many succe
I saw in my mail logs tonight, a bounced spam from 'unknown[1.52.36.176]'
1/8? When did that happen?
(Yes, yes, I know; last year. Just never seen one before...)
Cheers,
-- jra
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Jay Ashworth wrote:
1/8? When did that happen?
For this block, end of january judging from the changed:-line below.
inetnum:1.52.0.0 - 1.52.127.255
netname:FPT-NET
country:VN
descr: IP range for FPT Broadband Service
descr: 48 Va
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> remarks: For spamming matters, mail to ab...@fpt.vn
aka /dev/null as far as I can see. Huge volumes of abuse from this
range and from VNPT.
If any ops from there are around please email me offlist
--srs (postmaster for AS27477)
On 2/22/11 1:42 PM, David Hubbard wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has a howto floating around on the
> step by step setup of having an internal bgp peer for sending
> quick updates to border routers to null route sources of
> undesirable traffic? I've seen it discussed on nanog from
> time to t
Hi,
Was wondering where one in the SF Bay area might be able to borrow (or
otherwise procure at a reasonable cost) a short - less than 1 meter - section
of undersea fiber cable for a presentation I'll be giving in a few weeks. Feel
free to unicast your reply if you are in a position to assist.
(Yeah, high reply latency...)
Is Carrier V still filtering at sub-/32 on their IPv6 peerings? Last I was in a
position to check, not even Apple's /45 was visible from inside AS701.
-C
On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Eric Clark wrote:
> Don't remember about the v4 part, but 3 years ago they issue
On 2/23/11 10:10 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> (Yeah, high reply latency...)
>
> Is Carrier V still filtering at sub-/32 on their IPv6 peerings? Last I was in
> a position to check, not even Apple's /45 was visible from inside AS701.
evidence says that they are now accepting longer prefixes.
> -
On 11 Feb 11, at 19:24 , Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I'll start..
>>
>> Hurricane Electric Happily and readily provided me IPv6 Transit on
>> request.
>> Layer42 Happily and readily provided me IPv6 Transit
>> on re
I discussed this with Randy Whitney a few months ago. He informed me that they
had
been taking down to /48s for some time now.
Owen
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On 2/23/11 10:10 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
>> (Yeah, high reply latency...)
>>
>> Is Carrier V still filterin
15 matches
Mail list logo