I have a customer reporting the same thing. The traffic flood goes to
offline modem bank IPs. So far, Akamai hasn't actually grasped what the
problem is and says everything is fine. :(
Luckily, most of the traffic (not all) is coming from my local cluster,
so it's easier to monitor what's goin
Once upon a time, Jack Bates said:
> I have a customer reporting the same thing. The traffic flood goes to
> offline modem bank IPs. So far, Akamai hasn't actually grasped what the
> problem is and says everything is fine. :(
me too
I hadn't captured the traffic during one of the floods yet, b
Jack-
This is exactly what we're seeing. The Akamai server starts a
retransmission flood aimed at a specific address randomly. We're seeing
thousands of retransmissions of the same packet over and over again,
same sequence/ack numbers, all 1460 bytes. In the last capture I have,
it was all JP
On 1/21/2011 8:38 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:
Jack-
This is exactly what we're seeing. The Akamai server starts a
retransmission flood aimed at a specific address randomly. We're seeing
thousands of retransmissions of the same packet over and over again,
same sequence/ack numbers, all 1460 bytes. In
On 1/19/11 3:56 PM, "Chris Burwell" wrote:
> Any advice or tips would be helpful.
If all you need the ActionTek for is a MoCA bridge (to make the cable boxes
talk to the larger world), my experience is you can move it to the inside of
your NAT if you like. One does not need to burn a routable IP
The issue has been reported to the proper people inside Akamai. They are
investigating, we are not ignoring the issue.
If any network with on-net Akamai servers has an issue, including this or any
other, please e-mail netsupport-...@akamai.com and that will open a ticket with
our Network Suppo
On 1/21/2011 9:48 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The issue has been reported to the proper people inside Akamai. They
are investigating, we are not ignoring the issue.
I agree. Akamai NOC is always great to work with.
Jack
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
freebsd + varnish + carp (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html)
two of the three won't work @ EC2 (for my purposes, no idea about the
original poster - but he did ask about DNS based solutions so I suspect
he's in a similar boat)
--
david rai
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Jay Reitz wrote:
gdnsd is very robust and fast and has an interface that a networking
engineer won't mind. It comes with a geolocation plugin with
health-check failover via HTTP.
http://code.google.com/p/gdnsd/
Thanks Jay, that looks like a good option - I like single-f
It is unclear from this NOTAM whether this is an intentional
perturbation of the satellite signals vs. a terrestrial transmitter
(my money is on the latter), but it illustrates why one might want
geographically dispersed time sources on one's network, as well as why
the current trend towards decom
As I understand it, they're trying to get the WAAS sat back online and
working properly after it went on walkabout some time ago. It's currently in
a nonstandard orbit while they work on it. I suppose it's just pure
speculation that they'd only be working on the WAAS service since the NOTAM
doesn't
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:35:32PM -0500, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> As I understand it, they're trying to get the WAAS sat back online and
> working properly after it went on walkabout some time ago. It's currently in
> a nonstandard orbit while they work on it. I suppose it's just pure
> speculation
On 1/21/2011 9:31 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
It is unclear from this NOTAM whether this is an intentional
perturbation of the satellite signals vs. a terrestrial transmitter
(my money is on the latter)
I'm not sure how you'd get increasing radius with altitude from anything
but a jammer nea
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
>
>Nahh, that was the western WAAS sat, IIRC.
>
>This is...Something Else Entirely.
>
Ahh, my mistake.
Sitting in the back now,
-Jack Carrozzo
Probably related to:
http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/faa-warns-of-ongoing-gps-issues-in-so
utheastern-us-due-to-defens/
Sounds like they're doing 'tests' on GPS near SE Georgia.
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlo...@exempla.org
-Original Message-
F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yo All!
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> I'm not sure how you'd get increasing radius with altitude from anything but a
> jammer near sea level.
Agreed.
One of these tests was recently run in Utah and we saw the effects
in Central Oreg
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
Dear All
Hi
Default configuration for statefull firewall is to allow traffic form
TRUST ZONE to UNTRUST ZONE.
As I Know those device will use some feilds in the TCP Header.
But, how the firewall will handle this policy for none TCP traffics
(udp, icmp, and IPsec)?
I think understanding t
Kindly anyone on Global crossing get in touch with me off list.
I have a routing problem that i require assistance.
Regards,
Shake Righa
On 1/21/2011 at 9:39 PM Tarig Ahmed wrote:
|Dear All
|Hi
|
|Default configuration for statefull firewall is to allow traffic form
|TRUST ZONE to UNTRUST ZONE.
|
|As I Know those device will use some feilds in the TCP Header.
|
|But, how the firewall will handle this policy for none TCP traffics
On Jan 21, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yo All!
>
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure how you'd get increasing radius with altitude from anything but
>> a
>> jammer near sea level.
>
> Agreed.
>
>
"Matlock, Kenneth L" writes:
> Probably related to:
>
> http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/20/faa-warns-of-ongoing-gps-issues-in-so
> utheastern-us-due-to-defens/
>
> Sounds like they're doing 'tests' on GPS near SE Georgia.
Yes, very likely related considering that the map from the NOTAM is
publi
These protocols have their own headers, as well as the IP header that
the firewall can use to maintain state. The difference between them and
TCP is that these protocols are connectionless. Thus, the firewall does
not know when the connection has closed. The typical solution to this is
to have an a
Hello,
Default configuration for statefull firewall is to allow traffic form
TRUST ZONE to UNTRUST ZONE.
As I Know those device will use some feilds in the TCP Header.
But, how the firewall will handle this policy for none TCP traffics
(udp, icmp, and IPsec)?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=+how+do+sta
> I'd be curious to see what effects (if any) those who use
> GPS-disciplined NTP references in Southeastern Georgia see from this
> experiment.
>
Aren't CDMA BTS clocked off GPS?
NTP isn't going to be the only "ripple".
Regards,
Michael Holstein
Cleveland State University
> NTP isn't going to be the only "ripple".
Most of the "brand name" GPS NTP solutions have a clock
with is more than stable enough to survive without GPS
lock for 45 minutes(*). Some of the more expensive units with
temperature controlled oscillators have hold times in the
many weeks. My guess i
On Jan 21, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Michael Holstein wrote:
>
>> I'd be curious to see what effects (if any) those who use
>> GPS-disciplined NTP references in Southeastern Georgia see from this
>> experiment.
>>
>
> Aren't CDMA BTS clocked off GPS?
>
> NTP isn't going to be the only "ripple".
>
>
On Jan 21, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>> NTP isn't going to be the only "ripple".
>
> Most of the "brand name" GPS NTP solutions have a clock
> with is more than stable enough to survive without GPS
> lock for 45 minutes(*). Some of the more expensive units with
> temperature cont
BGP Update Report
Interval: 13-Jan-11 -to- 20-Jan-11 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS18025 26565 0.9% 737.9 -- ACE-1-WIFI-AS-AP Ace-1 Wifi
Network
2 - AS32528 1
This report has been generated at Fri Jan 21 21:11:51 2011 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Michael Holstein writes:
>> I'd be curious to see what effects (if any) those who use
>> GPS-disciplined NTP references in Southeastern Georgia see from this
>> experiment.
>
> Aren't CDMA BTS clocked off GPS?
>
> NTP isn't going to be the only "ripple".
Sure, and there are GPS-steered Rb clock
Gary Buhrmaster writes:
>> NTP isn't going to be the only "ripple".
>
> Most of the "brand name" GPS NTP solutions have a clock
> with is more than stable enough to survive without GPS
> lock for 45 minutes(*). Some of the more expensive units with
> temperature controlled oscillators have hold
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> Sure, and there are GPS-steered Rb clocks in telco-land too as well as
> a ton of stuff I don't know about yet until everyone else here chimes
> in; it's just that NTP is highly visible to NANOGers.
>
>
>
What about Modular DOCSIS 3.0
On 1/21/11 2:26 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>
> Michael Holstein writes:
>
>>> I'd be curious to see what effects (if any) those who use
>>> GPS-disciplined NTP references in Southeastern Georgia see from this
>>> experiment.
>>
>> Aren't CDMA BTS clocked off GPS?
>>
>> NTP isn't going to be
On Jan 21, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
>> NTP isn't going to be the only "ripple".
>
> Most of the "brand name" GPS NTP solutions have a clock
> with is more than stable enough to survive without GPS
> lock for 45 minutes(*). Some of the more expensive units with
> temperature cont
Joel Jaeggli writes:
>> Sure, and there are GPS-steered Rb clocks in telco-land too as well as
>> a ton of stuff I don't know about yet until everyone else here chimes
>> in; it's just that NTP is highly visible to NANOGers.
>
> if your high quality stratum one time source isn't capable of
> fre
With LTE picking up momentum, what type of new subscription management
tools will operators need?
(e.g. control complexities of billions of mobile data transactions,
personalized billing, centralized control across various licensed and
unlicensed bands, alerts when limits reached, etc.)
Brid
On Friday, January 21, 2011 04:23:52 pm Michael Holstein wrote:
> Aren't CDMA BTS clocked off GPS?
Yep; and many of the aftermarket GPS receivers commonly used for the
disciplined clock for NTP originally came from that service (Agilent/HP Z3801
and Z3816, for instance).
On 01/21/2011 04:29 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, January 21, 2011 04:23:52 pm Michael Holstein wrote:
>> Aren't CDMA BTS clocked off GPS?
> Yep; and many of the aftermarket GPS receivers commonly used for the
> disciplined clock for NTP originally came from that service (Agilent/HP Z3801
>
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Firstly (idle curiosity) - does anyone have further publicly
divulgable details on what's apparently a terrestrial jammer test or
maybe an operational exercise involving the Bermuda Triangle and
making planes and ships disappear...
My first thoug
40 matches
Mail list logo
