On Mon, jan 03, 2011 at 07:05:24, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> Subject: Re: The tale of a single MAC
>
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
> > I remember that there were several high-profile instances of
> duplicate
> > MAC addresses being burnt into NICs during the 1990s - once every
On 01/01/2011 09:33 PM, Graham Wooden wrote:
> In the last 15 years of being in IT, I have never encountered a ³burned-in²
> duplicated MACs across two physically different machines. What are the
> odds, that HP would dup¹d them and that both would eventually end up at my
> shop? Or maybe this ty
One interesting aside to all of this... HP Lefthand SAN actually licenses
the SAN/IQ software off of the NIC1 MAC address. I can't help but wonder if
the MAC address is set to that specific address to possibly get around that
(perhaps a leaked license or something).
If nothing else... You can lice
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 08:52:42AM -0500, ML wrote:
> If you're only redistributing 10 prefixes into OSPF? Problem?
I know I'm a little late to this thread, but figured I'd point out one
reason why this can be very dangerous:
In IOS, you use a route-map to control redistribution between protocols
I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run their own
servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target domains, suddenly
experiencing low levels of spam.
Total emails/day dropping from some 175,000-250,000ish to 50-75,000ish (legit
mail in the 2-5,000 per day, yes
-- Original Message ---
From: Ken Chase
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 13:04:55 -0500
Subject: sudden low spam levels?
> I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run
> their own servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target
> domain
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Ken Chase wrote:
> I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run their
> own
> servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target domains, suddenly
> experiencing low levels of spam.
>
There's definitely been a drop-off in spam level
On Jan 3, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Ken Chase wrote:
>
>> I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run their
>> own
>> servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target domains, suddenly
>> experiencing low levels of
Ken Chase wrote:
I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run their own
servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target domains, suddenly
experiencing low levels of spam.
Total emails/day dropping from some 175,000-250,000ish to 50-75,000ish (legit
mail in the 2
On 04/01/11 04:04, Ken Chase wrote:
> I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run their own
> servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target domains, suddenly
> experiencing low levels of spam.
Connection and rejection counts have been going bonkers of late for
I noticed a substantial drop in spam in my gmail account in recent days,
from several hundred a day to maybe a hundred. Ironically, gmail filtered
this thread to my spam folder.
Cheers,
Jayfar
> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:45:54 +1030
> From: Mark Smith
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 08:50:42 -0500
> Steven Bellovin wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jan 1, 2011, at 11:33 24PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 01 Jan 2011 20:59:16 -0700
> > > Brielle Bruns wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 1/1/11 8:33 PM
On Jan 3, 2011, at 8:02 PM, Jeff Aitken wrote:
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 08:52:42AM -0500, ML wrote:
If you're only redistributing 10 prefixes into OSPF? Problem?
I know I'm a little late to this thread, but figured I'd point out one
reason why this can be very dangerous:
In IOS, you use a
Hi,
I have been wondering what type of Software do top telcos use.
The tracking of Customer circuits to ensure that from marketing,sales,accounts
and technical department everything to do with the circuits has to be tracked.
Anyone with any help in regards to top software that can be used to ru
14 matches
Mail list logo
