Michael Sokolov wrote:
Leo Bicknell wrote:
There really isn't a lot of choice, 2 providers, and some minor choice
in how much speed you want to pay for with each one.
Does that mean no CLECs like Covad or DSL.net who colocate in the AT&T
CO, rent unbundled dry copper pairs and take it up fro
Jack Bates wrote:
And yet, I'm pretty sure there are providers that have different pipes
for business than they do for consumer, and probably riding some of
the same physical medium. This creates saturated and unsaturated
pipes, which is just as bad or worse than using QOS. The reason I'm
pr
On Saturday, September 18, 2010, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> You might look at http://fasterdata.es.net. A lot of it is aimed at very
> large volume data transfers, but quite a bit is relevant to all TCP
> issues.
> --
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
> Ernest O.
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:34:55 + nanog-requ...@nanog.org fuream loqour :
>From: "Abel Alejandro"
>Subject: Troubleshooting TCP performance tutorial
>
>This past week I have been trying to find the root cause of tcp
>performance problems of a few clients that are using a third party metro
>Ethernet
Hello all,
My team is working on technical and technological specifications of a
document for the deployment of Internet service on public frequencies in
rural areas. We welcome your thoughts on the topic in terms of previous
experiences and, well sure, you recommendation in terms of equipment. Yo
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Greco"
To: "Chris Boyd"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid,
On one hand, we all recognize oversubscription as an issue.
The high-level of oversub isn't the issue, it's pa
Eric,
Thanks for your reply. We're located in Haiti (Caribbean), we use basically
the same template than rural S. America and Africa. I'm waiting for you.
Regards,
Georges-Keny PAUL
2010/9/18 Eric Brunner-Williams
> Georges-Keny,
>
> Well, I wrote a WiMAX based BTOP application last year for ru
> > On one hand, we all recognize oversubscription as an issue.
>
> The high-level of oversub isn't the issue, it's part of the business model.
Of course the high level of oversub is an issue, because service
providers are not willing to commit to providing some particular
level of service. The
Of course the high level of oversub is an issue
We'll disagree then. Oversub makes access affordable.
..with the scary boogeyman of evil illegal P2P filesharing
That just tips the money in the wrong direction. And it's a real threat
(amongst others)...not just that deadly clown hiding
Check out the openbts and tier wireless projects.
"Georges-Keny PAUL" wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>My team is working on technical and technological specifications of a
>document for the deployment of Internet service on public frequencies in
>rural areas. We welcome your thoughts on the topic in term
Abel Alejandro wrote:
Greetings,
This past week I have been trying to find the root cause of tcp
performance problems of a few clients that are using a third party metro
Ethernet for transport. RFC2544 tests (Layer 2) and iperf using UDP give
good symmetric performance almost 100% the speed of t
I 'bookmarked' these folks:
http://www.plus.net/?home=hometop
on June 18, 2008 because they were one of the few who openly admitted to using
DPI to enforce QOS.
Two + years later, they're still around and apparently successful.
Just glancing through the site, I could no longer find any mention
12 matches
Mail list logo
