On 09/12/2010 08:42 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>> I would be careful actually using teredo, as some of them (eg:
>> Microsoft) have swaths of native IPv6 networks that are unreachable.
>
> While I would agree in principle, in practice we have little cont
Has anyone run into issues with HE's power and the limitations therein?
For instance they seem to want to sell a second rack of space to get any
reasonable amount of power into their enclosures.
The basic 40U Rack only comes with a single source of power which is
limited to 15A meaning it is reall
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010, Leen Besselink wrote:
On 09/12/2010 08:42 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Jared Mauch wrote:
I would be careful actually using teredo, as some of them (eg:
Microsoft) have swaths of native IPv6 networks that are unreachable.
While I would agree in princ
If you are experiencing DNSSEC lookup validation failures for domains
under the .UK TLD, you may (engineering-speak for almost definitely) need
to flush your name server caches.
http://www.nominet.org.uk/registrars/systems/serviceannouncements/
DNSSEC validation issue
Due to a failure of a
> While I would agree in principle, in practice we have little control
> over what customers use.
You won't have a good time at Disneyland if you ride Space Mountain in the
unsupported configuration of 'not belted in'. An ISP has no control over what
I set my MTU to, and they won't support me i
2350 is about an accurate date considering how quickly migration is happening
in most places :)
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Eisenberg
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:54:49
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: List of Teredo servers and teredo relays
> While I would agree in principle, in prac
Folks,
Question #1:
Is it possible for me to put an MPLS router on both ends of a circuit leased
from a transport service provider which does not support QinQ (i.e. packets of
1526 bytes), and which requires us to tag traffic onto a well specified set of
VLANs (i.e. if we want two VLANs, the s
Oops two typos - sunday evening casualties.
On 2010-09-12, at 10:06 PM, Francois Menard wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Question #1:
>
> Is it possible for me to put an MPLS router on both ends of a circuit leased
> from a transport service provider which does not support QinQ (i.e. packets
> of 1526 byt
>-Original Message-
>From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
>Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 1:10 PM
>To: John Levine
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: Re: ISP port blocking practice
>
>
>
>Sent from my iPad
COOL!
>
>On Sep 3, 2010, at 10:10 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
>>> Really? So, si
Todd,
You're not supposed to build out N+1 with HE's co-lo specials. They
offer the cabinet with a limited amount of power to prevent full
utilization of the unlimited bandwidth that comes with the bundle. I'm
sure they'll sell you space with whatever power and bandwidth you
require, but not at th
On 9/12/10 9:04 AM, todd glassey wrote:
Has anyone run into issues with HE's power and the limitations therein?
For instance they seem to want to sell a second rack of space to get any
reasonable amount of power into their enclosures.
Perhaps that was several years ago when we didn't offer cus
11 matches
Mail list logo
