On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
> become the norm.
With all due respect, I can't see it. Why would a home user need
multiple subnets? Are they really likely to have CPE capable of
routing between subnets at 21s
On 2010-07-30 09:27, Matthew Walster wrote:
> On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>> There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
>> become the norm.
>
> With all due respect, I can't see it. Why would a home user need
> multiple subnets?
* Wireless
* Wired
*
On 30 July 2010 08:32, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2010-07-30 09:27, Matthew Walster wrote:
>> On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>>> There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
>>> become the norm.
>>
>> With all due respect, I can't see it. Why would a home u
Matthew,
On Jul 30, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
> On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>> There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
>> become the norm.
>
> Why would a home user need multiple subnets?
Even today, people are deploying multiple s
On 30 July 2010 09:20, David Conrad wrote:
> Even today, people are deploying multiple subnets in their homes. For
> example, Apple's Airport allows you to trivially set up a "guest" network
> that uses a different prefix (192.168.0.0/24) and different SSID than your
> "normal" network (10.0.1
On Jul 30, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
> On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>> There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
>> become the norm.
>
> With all due respect, I can't see it. Why would a home user need
> multiple subnets? Are they re
Hello,
I am looking for monitoring tools that already have support to IPv6. I
am looking for both freeware and commercial tools.
Please, do you know what network management system are already
supporting IPv6 ?
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:38:56PM -0400, Atticus wrote:
> What world do live in? Yes, we extend the life of IPv4 by increasing the
> numeric range. As for "only needing port 80", I'm not really sure where
> you've been for the last decade or so. There's are hundreds of services
> using different p
On Jul 30, 2010, at 1:13 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
> On 30 July 2010 08:32, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> On 2010-07-30 09:27, Matthew Walster wrote:
>>> On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda wrote:
There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
become the norm.
>>
Hi,
I am looking for monitoring tools that already have support to IPv6. I
am looking for both freeware and commercial tools.
Please, do you know what network management system are already
supporting IPv6 ?
we keep the list in the "LIR Handbook" (page #64)
http://www.ripe.net/training/materia
Hi,
* Matthew Walster
On 30 July 2010 09:20, David Conrad wrote:
Even today, people are deploying multiple subnets in their homes.
For example, Apple's Airport allows you to trivially set up a
"guest" network that uses a different prefix (192.168.0.0/24) and
different SSID than your "normal"
On 30 July 2010 09:53, Owen DeLong wrote:
> 2. Yes, they are already available. A moderate PC with 4 Gig-E
> ports can actually route all four of them at near wire speed.
> For 10/100Mbps, you can get full featured CPE like the SRX-100
> for around $500. That's the upper
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:11:04 BST, Matthew Walster said:
> Seriously, this is getting silly. I'm not even going to respond any
> more - if you genuinely think users care about network management,
> you're wrong. They treat it as a black box, and that isn't going to
> change for a long, long, long ti
I think he was looking for something more in the nature of network
monitoring/analysis systems that support IPv6, like NTOP.
ntop has been ported to ipv6--although I am unsure of the results.
http://www.ntop.org/trac/wiki/ntop
cold is a snffer/analyzer with ipv6 support.
http://mailman.isi
Yes. This one. But also looking for IPv6 support for tools like
OpenView, Infovista, Concord eHealth.
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Patrick Darden wrote:
>
> I think he was looking for something more in the nature of network
> monitoring/analysis systems that suppo
In a message written on Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:13:54AM +0100, Matthew Walster
wrote:
> On 30 July 2010 08:32, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > On 2010-07-30 09:27, Matthew Walster wrote:
> >> On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> >> With all due respect, I can't see it. Why would a home user need
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.6diss.org/tutorials/management.pdf
http://tools.6net.org/
--- diogo.montag...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Diogo Montagner
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:06:31 +0800
Hello,
I am looking for monit
Matthew Walster wrote:
On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda wrote:
There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
become the norm.
With all due respect, I can't see it. Why would a home user need
multiple subnets? Are they really likely to have CPE capable of
Anyone on the list who can offer an explanation about the following
scenario? We have taken this up with providers at either end but it
will take awhile to filter up to the ASes in question.
We were seeing a London to Singapore connection go via San Jose
causing a 50%+ increase in latency.
It app
On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:11 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
> On 30 July 2010 09:53, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> 2. Yes, they are already available. A moderate PC with 4 Gig-E
>>ports can actually route all four of them at near wire speed.
>>For 10/100Mbps, you can get full featured CPE l
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
BGP Update Report
Interval: 22-Jul-10 -to- 29-Jul-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS472542987 2.5% 333.2 -- ODN SOFTBANK TELECOM Corp.
2 - AS25620 25906 1.5%
This report has been generated at Fri Jul 30 21:11:44 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Hi,
thanks for the link.
This was the best compilation that I found before. Unfortunately, this
presentation is a little bit old (2006). I am supposing that most of
commercial tools have improved your IPv6 support.
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:07 PM, nanogf . wrote:
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
