CMM - Cisco Multicast Manager www.cisco.com/go/cmm
2010/7/21 James Hess
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> >> Maybe they are having issues with their multicast mail routing protocol.
> > Looks like their mmrpf (multicast
Hi folks,
Can someone from amazon dot de or dot com onlineshop
contact me off-list regarding some abuse or rather anomolies with my
account?
Thanks a lot.
I would be appreciate if someone could assist me.
best regards,
-FliTTi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I was wondering what was going on. Kinda tired of seeing my own emails over and
over
> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:22:14 -0700
> From: se...@rollernet.us
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Multicast Network Monitoring
>
> On 7/20/2010 06:11, Brandon Kim wrote:
> >
> > Interesting questio
This says it's not just down for me. http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
Anyone else?
Loads from here (outside of Toronto, ON) - peered with them.
Seemed slow to load though..
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lewis [mailto:jle...@packetnexus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:45 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: PCH.net down?
This says it's not just down for me.
ht
From everywhere I've tried, it connects but loads slowly.
On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Jason Lewis wrote:
> This says it's not just down for me.
> http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
>
> Anyone else?
>
Also ok from France.
Lg also working fine (https://prefix.pch.net/applications/lg/), do you
need to look through a specific glass?
Loads from here (outside of Toronto, ON) - peered with them.
Seemed slow to load though..
It seems to be fine for me as well, in Australia. Loading time was a bit
slow, but I do have a few downloads running.
On 21/07/2010 8:44 PM, Jason Lewis wrote:
This says it's not just down for me. http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
Anyone else?
I received the same message from http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
but if I go to the site directly from Miami it pulls up, but is slow to do
so.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stewart [mailto:pstew...@nexicomgroup.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:47 AM
To: Jason Lewis; nanog
Hi
IETF IPv6 Operations WG is looking at this draft, and we're interested in any
comments you might have as well.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines
"Guidelines for Using IPv6 Transition Mechanisms", Jari Arkko, Fred
Baker, 12-Jul-10
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Allen Bass wrote:
> I received the same message from http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
> but if I go to the site directly from Miami it pulls up, but is slow to do
everyone should take careful note... downforeveryoneorjustme.com lives
... on appeng...@go
Very interesting - thanks for sharing that tip
Paul
-Original Message-
From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com]
On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:49 AM
To: Allen Bass
Cc: Paul Stewart; Jason Lewis; nanog@nanog.org
Subjec
Hello,
Do you know of any "vpn exchange point" implementations please? -I mean
something like IXP but for mpls vpns
Let's say I'm an ISP that bought or merged with many small ISPs each with it's
own AS# and would like to start offering mpls vpn services end to end
If there would be just a few a
On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Vitkovsky, Adam wrote:
> Do you know of any "vpn exchange point" implementations please? -I mean
> something like IXP but for mpls vpns
That would be like an IXP but for email. Or an IXP but for web traffic. VPNs
are an application that run over IP, and IXPs are i
We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver for
LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is to get
them to the point where once they get their IPv6 /32 allocation, they have a
good idea how to subdivide prefixes over their network and how
On Jul 21, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Jason Lewis wrote:
> This says it's not just down for me.
> http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
> Anyone else?
We don't know of an outage this morning, but one of our web servers has been a
bit slow because someone's been multi-thread downloading our routin
On 2010-07-21 12:57, Alex Band wrote:
> We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver for
> LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is to
> get them to the point where once they get their IPv6 /32 allocation, they
> have a good idea how to
http://pch.net/home/index.php
I got there with no problem
-henry
From: Bill Woodcock
To: Jason Lewis
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 9:58:24 AM
Subject: Re: PCH.net down?
On Jul 21, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Jason Lewis wrote:
> This says it's not jus
Alex this looks great! Just printed it out and will play with it. I've spent
some time learning
IPv6 but when you're not looking at it daily, you begin to forget
> From: al...@ripe.net
> Subject: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:57:01 +0200
> To: na
On 21 jul 2010, at 19:22, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2010-07-21 12:57, Alex Band wrote:
>> We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver
>> for LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is
>> to get them to the point where once they get th
I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final stage in
discussions I was told that it will cost $1500. I find this quite ridiculous
and it wi
On 21 jul 2010, at 21:08, Zaid Ali wrote:
> I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
> BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
> circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final stage in
> discussions I was told that it wil
I recently began the process of turning up BGP to AS 701 with both V4 and V6
peers and there were no additional costs.
Nathan Sipes
Sr. Network Design Specialist
Tel: 303-914-4996
FAX: 303-763-3510
Kinder Morgan
370 Van Gordon St
Lakewood, CO
80228
nathan_si...@kindermorgan.com
-Origi
Is dual-stacking with an edge device considered native? Or is "true" native
when you have
an edge device or any network device for that matter that's v6 only?
Just curious
> Subject: Re: v6 bgp peer costs?
> From: mar...@marcoh.net
> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:22:14 +0200
> To: z...@zaida
On 7/21/2010 12:34, Brandon Kim wrote:
>
> Is dual-stacking with an edge device considered native? Or is "true" native
> when you have
> an edge device or any network device for that matter that's v6 only?
>
> Just curious
>
Dual stack is considered native, i.e. "no tunnels".
~Seth
You can get a free IPv6 BGP tunnel from Hurricane Electric at
http://tunnelbroker.net
We have tunnel servers spread through out the world, so typically the
nearest server has reasonably low latency from your location.
Of course our main business is selling wholesale native IPv6 and IPv4
tr
On 7/21/2010 12:08, Zaid Ali wrote:
> I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
> BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
> circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final stage in
> discussions I was told that it will cost $
ARIN is pleased to offer a Meetings Fellowship Program to bring new voices and
ideas to public policy discussions. This call is for Fellows to attend ARIN
XXVI in Atlanta, GA from 6-8 October 2010. If you have never attended an ARIN
meeting and are interested in participating in the program, sub
NANOG50 BOF Atlanta.311 IEEE 802.1Q VLAN
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q
Triple-Tagging with 66-bit Addressing (48+18)
IP Addresses in MAC fields
NANOG operational testing needed with sample EDU reference routers
http://NetFPGA.org
BYOR - Bring/Buid Your Own Router - gigE to SATA
NANOG
On 7/21/10 12:22 PM, "Marco Hogewoning" wrote:
>
> On 21 jul 2010, at 21:08, Zaid Ali wrote:
>
>> I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
>> BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
>> circuit would be better but whatever!). Towa
On 2010-07-21 14:47, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
> For a novice ? I wouldn't recommend it. From what I get back 'in the field'
> it's already hard enough to get people familliar to the whole concept of
> hexadecimal without going into bit level. But then again, if you are a fairly
> technical compan
I already have a v6 BGP tunnel with Hurricane Electric and works like a
charm :) It is other vendors I am concerned about.
Zaid
On 7/21/10 12:38 PM, "Mike Leber" wrote:
>
> You can get a free IPv6 BGP tunnel from Hurricane Electric at
> http://tunnelbroker.net
>
> We have tunnel servers spre
OP is referencing MPLS/BGP VPNs, not like IPsec VPNs. And I'm not sure
that I've (personally) ever heard of an IXP for MPLS. The question
really is... does it make sense for carriers to create an MPLS/BGP VPN
sort of internet? I'd vote probably not in their immediate interests.
--WM
On Wed, Jul 2
On 21 jul 2010, at 21:50, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2010-07-21 14:47, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
>> For a novice ? I wouldn't recommend it. From what I get back 'in the field'
>> it's already hard enough to get people familliar to the whole concept of
>> hexadecimal without going into bit level.
On 7/21/10 12:39 PM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote:
> On 7/21/2010 12:08, Zaid Ali wrote:
>> I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
>> BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
>> circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final s
Hi Owen,
The RIPE NCC does actually ask for an addressing plan before we allocate a /32
IPv6, so I didn't phrase my opening email 100% accurate; we don't just blindly
hand it out. On the other hand, we don't do rigorous checks if it is actually
any good, or appropriate for their network.
What
Do any tools exist for automatically creating DNS zone files from
CDP/SNMP information? Do large networks typically do this in an
automated way?
Thanks.
Kent Frederick
Network Architect, Network Services
Iron Mountain
745 Atlantic Ave
Boston, MA 02111
Phone: (617) 535-4901
Mobile: (617) 894-7349
Fax: (208) 475-6722
kent.freder...@ironmountain.com
www.ironmountain.com
The information contained in this email message and its attachments is intende
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Our Network Documentation Tool [1] can generate DNS records for each
device interface with an IP address.
[1] https://netdot.uoregon.edu
[2]
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/presentations/Tuesday/Vicente-netdot-presentation-nanog49.pdf
cv
Dikk
"vpn exchange point" VLAN Exchange Points NANOG50 Atlanta.311
Tagged VLANs make most sense in dense MetroLANs (MANs)
What goes on in Atlanta Stays in Atlanta - NANOG50
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q
What goes on in North America Stays in North America ? NA ? North America ?
Note: 33-
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:59 PM, William McCall wrote:
> OP is referencing MPLS/BGP VPNs, not like IPsec VPNs. And I'm not sure
> that I've (personally) ever heard of an IXP for MPLS.
Isn't that what one iteration of IXP-NSP in Japan was? I seem to recall that
they talked about it a lot, back wh
On Jul 21, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:59 PM, William McCall wrote:
OP is referencing MPLS/BGP VPNs, not like IPsec VPNs. And I'm not
sure
that I've (personally) ever heard of an IXP for MPLS.
Isn't that what one iteration of IXP-NSP in Japan was? I see
NANOG to NEWNOG - BootCamp - August 9 - Friday, August 13, 2010
Restart or jumpstart your career with Router fundamentals
http://netfpga.org/tutorials/SummerCamp2010/index.php
Atlanta.311 NANOG50
http://netfpga.org/foswiki/bin/view/NetFPGA/OneGig/ProjectTable
Virtual Data Plane 1.2 In Progres
On 2010-07-21-15:08:10, Zaid Ali wrote:
> I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
> BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
> circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final stage in
> discussions I was told that it will c
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:48:42AM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Allen Bass wrote:
> > I received the same message from http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
> > but if I go to the site directly from Miami it pulls up, but is slow to do
>
> everyone sho
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 18:57 +0200, Alex Band wrote:
> We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course
> [...]
> how to subdivide prefixes over their network and how to write an
> addressing plan.
> Here's a PDF with the exercise (two pages A3): http://bit.ly/c7jZRJ
> I'm curious to h
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> IETF IPv6 Operations WG is looking at this draft, and we're interested
> in any comments you might have as well.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines
> "Guidelines for Using IPv6 Transition Mechanisms", Jari Ark
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:57:01 +0200
Alex Band wrote:
> We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver for
> LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is to
> get them to the point where once they get their IPv6 /32 allocation, they
> have a
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:57:01 +0200
Alex Band wrote:
> We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver for
> LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is to
> get them to the point where once they get their IPv6 /32 allocation, they
> have a
I think it is a very well planned exercise. I would suggest you not to
be straight in its execution. In some point, you could ask if the
decisions would be the same in cases with different conditions: more
pops, more users, less users, etc...
We have a similar exercise in our training at NIC.br a
>
>
> There is a third major challenge to dual-stack that isn't addressed in
> the document: differing network security models that must deliver the
> same result for the same collection of hosts regardless of whether
> Ipv4 or v6 is selected. I can throw a COTS d-link box with
> address-overload
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 20:37 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I can throw a COTS d-link box with
> > address-overloaded NAT on a connection and have reasonably effective
> > network security and anonymity in IPv4. Achieving comparable results
> > in the IPv6 portion of the dual stack on each of those hos
- Original Message -
> From: "Karl Auer"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Thursday, 22 July, 2010 4:24:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Looking for comments
> On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 20:37 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > I can throw a COTS d-link box with
> > > address-overloaded NAT on a connection and ha
On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Karl Auer"
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 22 July, 2010 4:24:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Looking for comments
>> On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 20:37 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> I can throw a COTS d-li
- Original Message -
> From: "Owen DeLong"
> To: "Franck Martin"
> Cc: "Karl Auer" , nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Thursday, 22 July, 2010 5:35:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Looking for comments
> On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>
> >
>
> > On Mac Airport Extreme it is "disallow o
55 matches
Mail list logo
