> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dillon [mailto:wavetos...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:39 PM
> To: Lee Howard
> Cc: Todd Underwood; Christopher Morrow; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Todd Underwood was a little late
>
> " "Registered but unrouted" would include s
> P.S. At this point, the IPv6 transition has failed, unlike the Y2K
> transition, and
> some level of crisis is unavoidable. In desperate times, people take desparate
> measures, and "adopting" IP address ranges that are not used by others in
> your locality seems a reasonable thing to do when eco
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
>> P.S. At this point, the IPv6 transition has failed, unlike the Y2K
>> transition, and
>
> For certain values of "fail." The odds of a dual-stack transition as
> initially
> envisioned by the IETF are vanishingly small, but IPv6 will be a signi
>>> P.S. At this point, the IPv6 transition has failed, unlike the Y2K
>>> transition, and
>>
>> For certain values of "fail." The odds of a dual-stack transition as
>> initially
>> envisioned by the IETF are vanishingly small, but IPv6 will be a significant
>> part of the coping strategies once R
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Michael Dillon
wrote:
>> I don't think we'll have (nor would we have in 2005 even) gotten an
>> ipv7/8/9/10 up and spec'd/coded/wrung-out before ~2 yrs from now
>> either. So, given the cards we have, ipv6 isn't all bad.
>
> On this we agree.
> The problem is not
Hi,
I am wondering what tools you consider most valuable when designing
big network from scratch or
perform a migration? For example I would like to know is there a tool
that will perform basic sanity checks
like network equipment without redundant link or without link at all...
I know that the on
You can take a look at netdude:
http://netdude.sourceforge.net/
-Original Message-
From: Bein, Matthew [mailto:mb...@iso-ne.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:59 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: PCAP Sanitization Tool
Hello,
Anyone know of a good tool for sanitizing PCAP files? I w
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Pavel Skovajsa
wrote:
> To emphasise more this subject, the technical support HP Procurve is
> providing (for free) is more consumer level and in my opinion is one of the
> key differentiators from teams like Cisco TAC. Here is a short laundry list
> of my experien
Pavel Dimow writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering what tools you consider most valuable when designing big
> network from scratch or perform a migration?
White board and a digital camera to document the drawings. Pen and paper
are also a very important tool.
> For example I would like to know is t
--- li...@quux.de wrote:
From: Jens Link
> I am wondering what tools you consider most valuable when designing big
> network from scratch or perform a migration?
-
Experience. If possible, find someone with it. Or, start reading 24x7
immediately
And how do you feel when client tell you that you don't have a
connection from SW-476 to SW-145?
"Well you see, there are plenty of boxes out there (couple hundreds)
you don't expect that everything must be perfect right? Anyhow I was
very tired that day"
The point is, I am not looking for a p
Hi everyone,
We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS servers (and possibly another UDP
based service)[1].
I see that ARIN are listing on https://www.arin.net/knowledge/ip_blocks.html
the smallest allocations from each prefix. Will we have trouble getting a /24
announced if we take it from
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:32 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS servers (and possibly another UDP
> based service)[1].
>
> I see that ARIN are listing on https://www.arin.net/knowledge/ip_blocks.html
> the smallest allocations from each pr
On Jun 21, 2010, at 23:34, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:32 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS servers (and possibly another UDP
>> based service)[1].
>>
>> I see that ARIN are listing on https://www.arin.net/knowl
Paul,
My biggest tool is a couple extra sets of eyes. A fresh look from the
outside by someone else is going to be the biggest help. Pen and Paper
(or Visio w/ Icons
http://packetlife.net/media/library/33/Cisco_Marketing_Icons.zip)
I personally like using network simulators to try out diffe
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:42 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 23:34, William Pitcock wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:32 +0200, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> We're going to anycast a /24 for some DNS servers (and possibly another
> >> UDP based servi
Everything should be documented and designed before its deployed. It should be
reviewed by others.
Then it should be tested. Its hard to make it past the testing phase and still
have these issues.
If your using a flawed deployment strategy, like many people do, where your
skipping design, do
On 2010-06-21, at 17:42, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> Are there (a significant number of) providers that will filter a /24
> announcement from an ARIN prefix not in the list of prefixes where they
> allocate /24 blocks.
Not in my experience, but I don't know how useful that is to know because I
AT&T announces ours. It just took a little bit of prodding to get the sales
people to ask the appropriate technical people.
We have a very old ARIN-allocated /24 but we have only one upstream, so we have
no AS number of our own.
On Jun 21, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On Jun 2
On Jun 21, 2010, at 23:55, Joe Abley wrote:
Everyone: Thanks for the replies regarding the /24 announcement from a "/20
allocated block". Yes, obviously the /20 announcement will handle the traffic,
too. I'm a regular reader on NANOG and consistently impressed by the
expertise on display and
> From: Joe Abley
> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:55:40 -0400
>
> I'm interested in the idea of anycasting one of the pool.ntp.org
> herd-members. Every time I've suggested such a thing I've been told
> (paraphrasing) that a good (server, client) NTP session exhibits
> reasonable RTT stability, this
sigh... where was this useful data 10 years ago!
http://www.fcc.gov/worldtravel/
--bill
Hi all,
I've got a local v4 peer (ie. an ISP whom I lease fibre from to feed my
clients, they peer with me directly, and we're about to provide mutual
transit for one another).
They (hereinafter 'client') have recently received a /22 from ARIN. The
client's immediate need is to re-assign a /23 to
Thinking that they will have to go back to ARIN for additional space
relatively quickly without intervention, can anyone provide links to
docs that will help prevent future renumbering or decent management? I
know that I can collapse a lot of their current waste, and I know
where
I can scrounge
There was a lightning talk on Netdot at Nanog 48 I'd take a look at the
presentation and the the website. It's quite useful from the documentation and
discovery standpoint
After the initial whit board I generally sit down and document what we're going
to build then we build a transition plan th
On 06/21/2010 08:46 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> There was a lightning talk on Netdot at Nanog 48 I'd take a look at the
> presentation and the the website. It's quite useful from the documentation
> and discovery standpoint
meh, it was nanog 49, and the link is:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/na
Are you considering doing SNTP or regular NTP?
If regular NTP... I once read some excellent advice on AnyCast:
"It often doesn't make sense to go through the extra complexity in deploying a
service with AnyCast addressing if it doesn't justify the benefit."
In this sense, I really don't understa
27 matches
Mail list logo
